Fu*%face Von Clownstick

Good question, I’m honestly not so sure we do, or at least not very much. I’d love to be proven wrong in that however.
We outnumber by orders of magnitude. If we could set aside the culture war bullshit and unify under the flag of the working class, we would have them by the short and curlies. A general strike would bring the rich and powerful (one and the same) to their fucking knees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: evo
something about nearly half of the voting aged people in this country not participating doesn't sit right with me, so who's feelings are more valid? what is you material case against participating? Let me ask you point blank, did you vote?
I voted. I haven’t always voted and may not again in the future. Voting can be described as a “privilege/right”, an “obligation” a “responsibility”, certainly ought not to be something we are required to do under penalty of law. Do you see the fundamental difference?
Who’s feelings matter more? Mine, to me. And likely yours, to you. Either way, thinking of the government as a tool to get other people to do what you want them to do isn’t right.
We outnumber by orders of magnitude. If we could set aside the culture war bullshit and unify under the flag of the working class, we would have them by the short and curlies. A general strike would bring the rich and powerful (one and the same) to their fucking knees.
I agree of course. But trying to make laws to force people to vote is the complete opposite of this
 
I voted. I haven’t always voted and may not again in the future. Voting can be described as a “privilege/right”, an “obligation” a “responsibility”, certainly ought not to be something we are required to do under penalty of law. Do you see the fundamental difference?
Who’s feelings matter more? Mine, to me. And likely yours, to you. Either way, thinking of the government as a tool to get other people to do what you want them to do isn’t right.

I agree of course. But trying to make laws to force people to vote is the complete opposite of this
I like a lot of what you said there, and it adds a lot of nuance to the conversation. The way I see it, it's about the government being a tool to keep people from hurting others. by not fulfilling your responsibility, you hand over more power to the already powerful. please don't give up on the process. In fact, I beg you to double down on your efforts. I promise you that all of us here are in fact on the same team, and we need to work together, and work harder to bring forth the real, meaningful changes that I think will let us leave this world in a better state than it was when we got here.
 
his is just my opinion, but I believe what the populace at large currently holds is the illusion of power. We've been given just enough to keep us complacent, docile, and obedient, but not enough to hold any actual power. That power belongs to the hands of a fraction of a percentage of the population. The system has been purposely designed to discourage large groups of citizens from participating and has created a cultural divide that is downright terrifying.
The biggest part of me agrees with this, “selected not elected” and so on. Sam longhorn Clemens said something to the effect “if voting mattered they wouldn’t let you do it.” And that’s always rang true to me. But I don’t always want to be a cynic. As I grow and learn and experience more I try to challenge my personal beliefs and see if they still hold water, and they don’t always.
And I also agree that the level of division that exists in our country is frightening, maybe unbridgeable, this thread as an ironic example of that.
You lose me a little on your second post. I didn’t say anything of those things you listed are ok. Also, what laws condone murder? I’m trying to get what you’re saying there but I can’t figure it out.
In your example, how would someone be handled who refused mandated voting, and also refused the 50$ fine? The next step is either over reach (we’re there already in my opinion), or for the govt to give up because the law isnt enforceable, and so then it’s irrelevant, and why did we waste time and money on it in the first place?
Participation is either willful, or coerced. I’m not sure if there’s any grey area there but there could be.
 
I like a lot of what you said there, and it adds a lot of nuance to the conversation. The way I see it, it's about the government being a tool to keep people from hurting others. by not fulfilling your responsibility, you hand over more power to the already powerful. please don't give up on the process. In fact, I beg you to double down on your efforts. I promise you that all of us here are in fact on the same team, and we need to work together, and work harder to bring forth the real, meaningful changes that I think will let us leave this world in a better state than it was when we got here.
You’re a thoughtful guy and it seems like your desire for collectivism is genuine. I don’t know what has to change to bridge the current gaps of course, but we should probably turn off our televisions.
 
What I'm proposing is not a show of force. Nobody is going to come drag your ass out of bed and haul you off to the voting booth. It's a nudge to encourage people to participate. If you choose not to participate then you can pay $50 to entertain the people who do care enough to exercise their civic duty.

All gov't regulations are a show of force. Of course, some regulations are necessary for a functioning society but just because it makes you feel warm and fuzzy doesn't negate the fact that it's still a show of force. Don't believe me? Refuse to pay the fine and see what happens. Somebody earlier likened it to a parking ticket. Haha yeah it's just a parking ticket. Refuse to pay parking tickets for a while and it ends up with a warrant for your arrest.

People shouldn't be cavalier about using gov't force to exercise their will over the people. Freedom is messy. People aren't always going to behave the way you want them to but I prefer the animating contest of freedom to the tranquility of servitude.
 
I was thinking that community service would be better than an actual cash punishment. I think it should be enough hours to really compel people from any income bracket to actually go and fulfill their civic duty, but if you really don't want to vote for whatever reason, you should get out their and do some work for your community and contribute in some way you feel is meaningful. And I do think it should be a significant burden, because voting isn't, and by not voting, you make the process inherently less democratic. I suggested earlier maybe 2000 hours of servivce, with 4 years to complete it. You should still have the write in option too, so you can even cast a protest vote for literally anybody. and reasonable accomodations should be made, like they do in Australia, which does have mandatory voting.
I like my idea better. Kinda like parenting, rewards vs punishment. Save the heavy hand for when it’s needed.
That and it’s interesting what Musk did. Just like the prohibition make incentive voting legal fair and legal if it’s the government that does it but save the heavy hand for other.
 
Last edited:
Also, what laws condone murder?
Great ‘seeing’ you again Jon. Not arguing but being very literal.
Laws that condone murder can be many things. The most blatant being the death penalty.

Then repressive laws leading to mental health (and physical) health anguish, leading to suicide…

Not to mention the cases where abortive care is a lifesaving procedure. The lack of the abortion leads to the murder of the mother, and in other cases a more developed non viable child/baby/fetus. I cannon fathom the horror of knowing the fetus inside my body is a terminal death sentence. (Obviously if I had those parts). It would be excruciating enough loosing the fetus.
 
I was thinking that community service would be better than an actual cash punishment. I think it should be enough hours to really compel people from any income bracket to actually go and fulfill their civic duty, but if you really don't want to vote for whatever reason, you should get out their and do some work for your community and contribute in some way you feel is meaningful. And I do think it should be a significant burden, because voting isn't, and by not voting, you make the process inherently less democratic. I suggested earlier maybe 2000 hours of servivce, with 4 years to complete it. You should still have the write in option too, so you can even cast a protest vote for literally anybody. and reasonable accomodations should be made, like they do in Australia, which does have mandatory voting.
It just feels like we are blaming the voters for the shitty options. Listen, there’s nothing they want. That’s not their fault. If the machine wants votes, don’t suppress populist candidates like Sanders. Don’t let the money do the talking.

Compelling people to do anything they don’t want to do is just wrong in my opinion, as long as they aren’t harming someone. Autonomy is so dope!!
 
something about nearly half of the voting aged people in this country not participating doesn't sit right with me, so who's feelings are more valid? what is you material case against participating? Let me ask you point blank, did you vote?
Make your candidate worth voting for and people will vote for them.

So my options were Captain Fuckwad Von Clownstick or Suzy Bleedingheart Elitist.

Screwed from the get go.
^2016, taken from this thread. Lol
Screwed then, screwed now.
 
It seems pretty clear that if it somehow made it on the ballot, even with a superlative turnout, the result would be a resounding no on a level never seen. I have some ideas to chew on for a minute, and while not totally sure I wouldn't still go in favor of a mandate, I have read some thing here that give me significant pause.
 
Well, more than in China, where there is only one party to “vote” for.
for as partisan as american politics has become, the reality is that republican and democratic positions are not very different. mad the republican lost in any given year? wait eight to twelve years and the democrat will be running on their platform. like two weeks ago kamala harris was on cnn bragging that trump couldnt get his wall built and paid for by mexico, unlike biden and me doing the real work of anti-migrant legislation! if your concern is environmentalism, which party are you supposed to vote for? the democrats under obama continued to accelerate fossil fuel extraction until america became the biggest producer on the planet. biden opened vulnerable alaskan wetlands to an $8B oil project, the largest in the country. both biden and harris refused to ban fracking. talk of green energy from the democrats is cheap and history proves it. if your concern is climate change, you dont have a political option in america. if your concern is the administration supporting war and genocide, you dont have a political option in america. if your concern is the administration caging children at the border, you dont have a political option in america.

where is the democracy? clearly millions of american voters felt the same way and recognizing a false choice, didnt bother
 
They could at least vote for Oceans. Recent polling suggests that he is a far more viable candidate. I will continue to vote for Oceans; never had a write in that was easier to feel good about
 
Back
Top Bottom