Fu*%face Von Clownstick

Arb23 said:
Yeah. Sure. Ok.
Click to expand...
That responses reads yep big assumption thats been feed to me.
Arb23 said:
How so? We (our representatives to be more precise) often vote on things that restrict the actions of others. Laws are mostly to prevent people from doing things under penalty of arrest, imprisonment or death.
Click to expand...
People have the freedom to burn the flag. Them burning the flag doesnt affect me. I find it offensive and insulting, however I would vote infavor of allowing them to do it. Voting to not allow it based on my dislike that has no direct impact on my life other than me being offended would be denying them of their freedom to do this therefore unamerican in my view. Simply denying others freedom is unamerican
 
Arb23 said:
How so? We (our representatives to be more precise) often vote on things that restrict the actions of others. Laws are mostly to prevent people from doing things under penalty of arrest, imprisonment or death.
Click to expand...
Voting on a speed limit is different than voting on allowing flag burning. One action, speeding affects others. The flag burning doesnt affect others. This is the defining difference.
 
owScott said:
That responses reads yep big assumption thats been feed to me.

People have the freedom to burn the flag. Them burning the flag doesnt affect me. I find it offensive and insulting, however I would vote infavor of allowing them to do it. Voting to not allow it based on my dislike that has no direct impact on my life other than me being offended would be denying them of their freedom to do this therefore unamerican in my view. Simply denying others freedom is unamerican
Click to expand...

Yeah - I actually agree with you on the flag issue. I wouldn't support a bill or law to ban it, but I find it offensive as well. Thank you for your service, by the way! I do understand where you're coming from, and it reads as heartfelt, so I won't debate it with you on an online forum called Fu*%face Von Clownstick lol...
 
Last edited:
Arb23 said:
Yeah - I actually agree with you on the flag issue. I wouldn't support a bill or law to ban it, but I find it offensive as well. Thank you for your service, by the way! I do understand where you're coming from, and it reads as heartfelt, so I won't debate it with you on an online forum called Fu*%face Von Clownstick lol...
Click to expand...
I think we may be closer in overall agreement. Understanding other people definations I think is key and where things can go astray.
 
I find it preposterous to believe that everyone here has carefully researched these issues, talked to people who know more about them, and thought long and deeply about each and every topic, and then just "happened" to come to the exact same conclusions as every other member of their "team", whether they fancy themselves as members of the blue team, or members of the red team. The level of groupthink, ideological conformity, and virtue signaling in political discussions is mind-boggling to me. When you outsource your thinking to the newsmodels on television, you begin to speak in unison whenever certain "hot button" issues come up. You play into the hands of those who seek to divide and control us.

Here's a question for the group:

What is one major, politicized issue, that is popular to talk about in mainstream media, where you firmly disagree with your team's stance, that you would admit to in an open forum? If you like wearing a blue hat, what issue do you completely disagree with from their official position? Likewise if you prefer wearing a red hat, where do you completely disagree with them? Major things only, not minutiae.
 
It's interesting that Congress actually passed a law to ban flag burning. It was struck down by the Supreme Court and ruled unconstitutional and a violation of first amendment free speech rights.

I'm not an expert on such things but that looks like a pretty good functioning system to me.
 
Arb23 said:
Should only read as not everyone has the same level of faith in our legal system after the last few years.
Click to expand...
Thats fine, but its what we got. Best to let it playout. You may not like the outcome but this how or system works. In my view the best system in the world.
 
Muggs said:
I find it preposterous to believe that everyone here has carefully researched these issues, talked to people who know more about them, and thought long and deeply about each and every topic, and then just "happened" to come to the exact same conclusions as every other member of their "team", whether they fancy themselves as members of the blue team, or members of the red team. The level of groupthink, ideological conformity, and virtue signaling in political discussions is mind-boggling to me. When you outsource your thinking to the newsmodels on television, you begin to speak in unison whenever certain "hot button" issues come up. You play into the hands of those who seek to divide and control us.

Here's a question for the group:

What is one major, politicized issue, that is popular to talk about in mainstream media, where you firmly disagree with your team's stance, that you would admit to in an open forum? If you like wearing a blue hat, what issue do you completely disagree with from their official position? Likewise if you prefer wearing a red hat, where do you completely disagree with them? Major things only, not minutiae.
Click to expand...
Ok I will bite. I dont like college dept forgivness. No free 4 year college. Not a fan of labor unions.
 
Arb23 said:
It was the time the DOJ ass clowned themselves. Can't remember which time, sorry. Been so many.
Click to expand...
Do you mean the time when instead of recommending indicting Trump for collusion with Russia they left it up to congress. Resulting in the the AG Barr totalling spinning the finds of the report into what the Rep congress claimed was an exoneration of Trump. Robert Mueller totally blew it. Allowing Trump to get out it front of it and blowing smoke up his supporters asses.
 
owScott said:
Do you mean the time when instead of recommending indicting Trump for collusion with Russia they left it up to congress. Resulting in the the AG Barr totalling spinning the finds of the report into what the Rep congress claimed was an exoneration of Trump. Robert Mueller totally blew it. Allowing Trump to get out it front of it and blowing smoke up his supporters asses.
Click to expand...
Lol! Yeah the time they attempted to knee cap the sitting president for being a Russian agent based on made up stories paid for by the DNC - yeah that was one of them. So many to pick from.
 
Arb23 said:
Lol! Yeah the time they attempted to knee cap the sitting president for being a Russian agent based on made up stories paid for by the DNC - yeah that was one of them. So many to pick from.
Click to expand...
He wasnt being knee capped for being a Russian agent. Maybe a better reading and understanding would enlighten you on your lack of understanding of what the report was about. Solid evidence he colluded just that Mueller wouldnt recommend indictment of a sitting president. Sounds like you swallowed the bait without actually understanding what Mueller said. Anyhow too big a subjct to debate here. I invite you to actually look into what the report said. And not Fox news version.
 
I read the dossier front to back. It was shocking, I tell you!

The part where he was peeing on the bed while reading the nuke launch codes was very scary.

(Edit)
I'm literally shaking right now.
 
Last edited:
Shadowscape said:
They have changed biologically. They have all the proper parts you consider male and female parts.
The fact they can't produce babies has no bearing. I can't have children. Does that make me a non-male?
Click to expand...
Would you date/shag one?
I’m adding an edit here.
Even if they didn’t ‘pass’ (meaning could pass for a biologically born female)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom