Fu*%face Von Clownstick

Muggs said:
I find it preposterous to believe that everyone here has carefully researched these issues, talked to people who know more about them, and thought long and deeply about each and every topic, and then just "happened" to come to the exact same conclusions as every other member of their "team", whether they fancy themselves as members of the blue team, or members of the red team. The level of groupthink, ideological conformity, and virtue signaling in political discussions is mind-boggling to me. When you outsource your thinking to the newsmodels on television, you begin to speak in unison whenever certain "hot button" issues come up. You play into the hands of those who seek to divide and control us.

Here's a question for the group:

What is one major, politicized issue, that is popular to talk about in mainstream media, where you firmly disagree with your team's stance, that you would admit to in an open forum? If you like wearing a blue hat, what issue do you completely disagree with from their official position? Likewise if you prefer wearing a red hat, where do you completely disagree with them? Major things only, not minutiae.
Click to expand...
Ok I will bite. I dont like college dept forgivness. No free 4 year college. Not a fan of labor unions.
 
Arb23 said:
It was the time the DOJ ass clowned themselves. Can't remember which time, sorry. Been so many.
Click to expand...
Do you mean the time when instead of recommending indicting Trump for collusion with Russia they left it up to congress. Resulting in the the AG Barr totalling spinning the finds of the report into what the Rep congress claimed was an exoneration of Trump. Robert Mueller totally blew it. Allowing Trump to get out it front of it and blowing smoke up his supporters asses.
 
owScott said:
Do you mean the time when instead of recommending indicting Trump for collusion with Russia they left it up to congress. Resulting in the the AG Barr totalling spinning the finds of the report into what the Rep congress claimed was an exoneration of Trump. Robert Mueller totally blew it. Allowing Trump to get out it front of it and blowing smoke up his supporters asses.
Click to expand...
Lol! Yeah the time they attempted to knee cap the sitting president for being a Russian agent based on made up stories paid for by the DNC - yeah that was one of them. So many to pick from.
 
Arb23 said:
Lol! Yeah the time they attempted to knee cap the sitting president for being a Russian agent based on made up stories paid for by the DNC - yeah that was one of them. So many to pick from.
Click to expand...
He wasnt being knee capped for being a Russian agent. Maybe a better reading and understanding would enlighten you on your lack of understanding of what the report was about. Solid evidence he colluded just that Mueller wouldnt recommend indictment of a sitting president. Sounds like you swallowed the bait without actually understanding what Mueller said. Anyhow too big a subjct to debate here. I invite you to actually look into what the report said. And not Fox news version.
 
I read the dossier front to back. It was shocking, I tell you!

The part where he was peeing on the bed while reading the nuke launch codes was very scary.

(Edit)
I'm literally shaking right now.
 
Last edited:
Shadowscape said:
They have changed biologically. They have all the proper parts you consider male and female parts.
The fact they can't produce babies has no bearing. I can't have children. Does that make me a non-male?
Click to expand...
Would you date/shag one?
I’m adding an edit here.
Even if they didn’t ‘pass’ (meaning could pass for a biologically born female)
 
Last edited:
Arb23 said:
Lol! Yeah the time they attempted to knee cap the sitting president for being a Russian agent based on made up stories paid for by the DNC - yeah that was one of them. So many to pick from.
Click to expand...
doesnt really matter what stories lead to the investigation, its what they found that matters. If the police get called out a call for J walking and no one is J walking but there is a murder going one it doesnt make the murder nonexsistant
 
Mick Dempsey said:
I’m curious, we’re having a debate about it, seems a reasonable question.
Click to expand...
So, it was a bit glib of a response, but it was a rhetorical question. I understand that you're asking if we would want to be intimate with a Trans person, and to that I would have to assume that if I have gotten far enough along that we're getting that serious, then probably yes, but it's never come up. I have been married for many years now. That doesn't change the fact that no matter how I would react when actually confronted with that scenario, I believe that everyone should be free to be whoever they are.

When we are going to hold a vote on things that are as binding as laws, I believe that voting should be mandatory, and it should be easy to do. I believe that everyone should have to weigh in on the matter. I am tired of so few people turning up to vote and then saying that voting doesn't work; they haven't tried.

But voting is like washing your hands. It's not the cure to all disease, but it helps limit the spread of bacteria and viruses, and is part of an overall plan for maximum health.
 
Matias said:
So, it was a bit glib of a response, but it was a rhetorical question. I understand that you're asking if we would want to be intimate with a Trans person, and to that I would have to assume that if I have gotten far enough along that we're getting that serious, then probably yes, but it's never come up.
Click to expand...
So to clarify (as we’re in the realm of the theoretical) are we talking only post penile inversion vaginoplasty before you’d have sex with this theoretical person, or would you have sex with a self identified female with all the male genatalia in place?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom