Fu*%face Von Clownstick

Yeah, it's truly impressive what unlimited resources and political motivation can do.
Clearly you missed the part of the Mueller report where Trump's campaign CEO Paul Manafort gave Trump campaign internal polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik, who just happened to be a Russian intelligence agent. Kinda make one wonder, doesn't it?

You seem to have also missed the multiple pages where Mueller lays out all the times Trump engaged in obstruction, which by the way is illegal...
 
So to clarify (as we’re in the realm of the theoretical) are we talking only post penile inversion vaginoplasty before you’d have sex with this theoretical person, or would you have sex with a self identified female with all the male genatalia in place?
If you're truly intrigued by my theoretical choices, we'll have to start by assuming that I never met my wife, with whom I have an awesome thing going on. In that hypothetical world where I met a trans woman and was so into her that we had arrived at the point of wanting to have sex, but she had declined to bring it up at all until that point, I would be surprised I'm sure, but if I am turned on by this person, in the heat of the moment, I would probably dive in, metaphorically speaking. If they mentioned it at the outset of meeting, I might be concerned that it is too much a centerpiece of their personality, and not just a part of who they are, and that sounds like an extreme person in general, and I tend not to waste too much time with extremists of any kind, as I just have better things to do with my time.

Is that what you want baby? Is this working for you? Sufficiently turned on?

None of this addresses the fact that these freedoms that are the core of that sidebar are at the core of the Human experience, and that freedom should extend to all who seek to not harm anyone with their actions.
 
Clearly you missed the part of the Mueller report where Trump's campaign CEO Paul Manafort gave Trump campaign internal polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik, who just happened to be a Russian intelligence agent. Kinda make one wonder, doesn't it?

You seem to have also missed the multiple pages where Mueller lays out all the times Trump engaged in obstruction, which by the way is illegal...
Hang on...I'm reading it now...

FnqUTzpWYAAlymQ.jpg
 
Would you date/shag one?
I’m adding an edit here.
Even if they didn’t ‘pass’ (meaning could pass for a biologically born female)
I wouldn't have a problem with that. But apparently it scares some of you for some reason. An attractive looking lady with lady parts... Not an issue from where I sit. I can't have children so it wouldn't matter if she could. Heck yeah. Of course, I would have to like her as a person as well.
 
Last edited:
Question for all those on the other side: What if someday we are able to transplant your brain into a new body, and one decides to be put into a body of the opposite sex from what they were. What are your thoughts on that? And if you think it would be okay, why? Where is the line drawn as to how much of the person can be changed that it goes from not okay to okay? We swap out hearts, lungs, livers from other sexes and nobody complains. Why would some sex organs make you go nuts over it? Before saying, the person wants to change sexes is the issue, please refer to the beginning question about brain transplants and changing sexes, and does your brain determine what sex you should be or is it your penis that makes that determination.
Just food for thought...
 
Last edited:
For all the Trumpets on here. What exactly is it about the man that you find admirable, appealing, or worth defending? Genuinely curious.
I am looking forward to this one. I think they are pretty miserable lot myself. Drink too much, swear a lot, and look like some old decerped billy goat when they take their clothes off. I much rather hang out with the ladies who look good, smell good and don't talk sports, whether natural or man made.
 
  • Like
Reactions: evo
Let's see. Asks a completely hypothetical question about something that can't be done and gets mad about a hypothetical answer that that's both humourous and impossible. Yeah, I do talk to them like they are 13, in the hypothetical scenario where 13 year olds own trees.
 
I do hope you get some more serious responses to your question, though. It's an interesting exploration of attitudes towards a taboo subject, which is always fun to see what folks think.

Edit: taboo is not the right word - perhaps human sexual subject might be better.
 
I do hope you get some more serious responses to your question, though. It's an interesting exploration of attitudes towards a taboo subject, which is always fun to see what folks think.

Edit: taboo is not the right word - perhaps human sexual subject might be better.
Now that is an adult response worth noting.
 
We really need to get back to and focus on why the senile moron from Delaware is arresting his political opponents on "trumped up" charges. This little side show on abortion, gays, cakes, and guns are not doing it for me. FOCUS people!
Somehow the senile old moron from Delaware has created more jobs in just 3 years than the last 3 republican presidents combined could create in 16 years. Despite Trump telling us all that he was gonna be the greatest jobs president in US history, your boy Donny is in a very elite group of US presidents who left office with a NET LOSS in jobs. Making America Great Again, once job loss at a time!
 
Ok I will bite. I dont like college dept forgivness. No free 4 year college. Not a fan of labor unions.
No I meant a core, long-standing, party line issue that you genuinely disagree with, not some cockamamie scheme cooked up to buy votes. "Vote for us, we'll give you (insert free shit here)". Only an automaton would wholeheartedly agree with everything that the blue hats or the red hats say and think. It's to the point where someone hears just one opinion that you have, and they can very accurately predict your opinion on hundreds of other things. Has nobody realized after the last 3 years of total bullshit that maybe, just maybe, you're outsourcing your thinking to the people on the television?
 
No I meant a core, long-standing, party line issue that you genuinely disagree with, not some cockamamie scheme cooked up to buy votes. "Vote for us, we'll give you (insert free shit here)". Only an automaton would wholeheartedly agree with everything that the blue hats or the red hats say and think. It's to the point where someone hears just one opinion that you have, and they can very accurately predict your opinion on hundreds of other things. Has nobody realized after the last 3 years of total bullshit that maybe, just maybe, you're outsourcing your thinking to the people on the television?
I gave you 3 right off. Labor unions arent a core long standing party line issue? And if you are including me in your hypothesis I assure you this is a very bad assumption. What is your point here? I notice you didnt chime in with an anwser.
 
It all isn't total bullshit. Trump got indited on felony charges. That is not bullshit. That is wonderful, factual news.
But there is a lot of bullshit, like Fox News.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom