Fu*%face Von Clownstick

I gave up a couple of days ago. There is no gray matter between their ears, just a hollow void with an echo rattling around in there.
Just chalk it up as their parents failed miserably at doing their job of raising an intelligent child with manners and the ability to think. One is just a troll, and this one is a scarecrow that has no idea where the Emerald City is located.
 
Arb23 said:
Thanks for keeping the highly respected "Fu*%face Von Clownstick" thread at its intellectual best.
Click to expand...
This is possibly the first time in history that someone has used the words intellectual and respected when discussing Old Bone Spur!

Kudos my friend as this is an amazing feat for which you should be proud..
 
Last edited:
”never pass on the opportunity to have a little fun with a triggered trumpsters. It will be bring you immense joy and satisfaction.”
 
rico said:
Do try and keep up little man. Trump has been charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records, which is a classic white collar crime.

conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...
Keep it together man you're still off in BlueAnon land.... If you still can't understand, all counts are based on hush contracts which have never equated as campaign contributions through out history. So, no federal campaign finance law violation=no felony, no felony=no case.... Don't know how to dumb it down further for you. $20 bucks if you can up with something.
 
Last edited:
Scottyfpv said:
Keep it together man you're still off in BlueAnon land.... If you still can't understand, all counts are based on hush contracts which have never equated as campaign contributions through out history. So, no federal campaign finance law violation=no felony, no felony=no case.... Don't know how to dumb it down further for you. $20 bucks if you can up with something.
Click to expand...
Hey, Stupid.
The charges are not about federal campaign finance law violations. I don't know where your empty brain is getting this misinformation, but it is just that.
Try learning, then speaking. You will sound smarter and not so much like a loud-mouthed dim wit that you are.
 
Shadowscape said:
Hey, Stupid.
The charges are not about federal campaign finance law violations. I don't know where your empty brain is getting this misinformation, but it is just that.
Try learning, then speaking. You will sound smarter and not so much like a loud-mouthed dim wit that you are.
Click to expand...
You're a living meme, cute

What planet are you on, aren't you following the case?

Shadow......If you don't learn to relax you're going to give yourself a vaccine induced stroke and everyone is going to blame your death on me.
 
Oh brother!

Bragg was unequivocal about the scope of the charges. “Under New York State law, it is a felony to falsify business records with the intention of fraud and intent to conceal another crime,” he said. “That is exactly what this case is about.”
“Trump then went to great lengths to hide this conduct, causing dozens of false entries in business records to conceal criminal activity, including attempts to violate state and federal election laws,” he continued.
“Each check was processed by the Trump Organization and illegally disguised as a payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a non-existent retainer agreement,” Bragg said.

I repeat, Hey, stupid! Some day, maybe, you will grow up, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
 
Last edited:
Shadowscape said:
Oh brother!

Bragg was unequivocal about the scope of the charges. “Under New York State law, it is a felony to falsify business records with the intention of fraud and intent to conceal another crime,” he said. “That is exactly what this case is about.”
“Trump then went to great lengths to hide this conduct, causing dozens of false entries in business records to conceal criminal activity, including attempts to violate state and federal election laws,” he continued.
“Each check was processed by the Trump Organization and illegally disguised as a payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a non-existent retainer agreement,” Bragg said.

I repeat, Hey, stupid! Some day, maybe, you will grow up, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
Click to expand...
Bragg has a number of problems, not that he cares. His goal is to drag this out and loom over the primary process, so mission accomplished.

First, it kinda sorta is about federal campaign finance law. The statute of limitations on Trump’s “crimes” is 2 years if misdemeanors, five years if felonies. You’ll kindly note these alleged infractions took place in 2015/2016. So full stop unless Bragg can link them to an underlying crime, which he failed to name in either the indictment or his press conference. We can only assume it’s federal election or campaign finance law.

So the question becomes, can Bragg turn (expired) state misdemeanors into federal (campaign finance) felonies, when the federal government has not (and in fact declined) to charge him with that same felony? It’s basically unheard of. Bragg is literally trying to charge Trump with state federal crimes. There is obviously no such thing.

I’m not defending Trump as a human, just opining on the case. It’s tenuous at best.

One other observation: the crux of the case seems to be that Trump sought to influence the election by paying Stormy hush money to keep news of their “affair” out of the news. An affair that took place in 2006. Does Bragg really think the voting public would have been swayed by this news, but they were not swayed by Trump being caught on tape just 3 weeks before the election admitting to grabbing women by the yoo-hoo?
 
Scottyfpv said:
Keep it together man you're still off in BlueAnon land.... If you still can't understand, all counts are based on hush contracts which have never equated as campaign contributions through out history. So, no federal campaign finance law violation=no felony, no felony=no case.... Don't know how to dumb it down further for you. $20 bucks if you can up with something.
Click to expand...
I apologize for taken so long to get back to ya, but I was working. You should try it sometime because it really does the body and soul some good.

Please explain this BlueAnon you keep rambling on about?
 
How bout this….. can anyone name the underlying crime Trump is charged with? You know, the one required to defeat the statute of limitations and bump these misdemeanors up to felonies?

You’re not alone. Bragg can’t either. The indictment might truly be insufficient on its face.

(FWIW, one theory is that he won’t disclose the underlying crime so that if his weak case is dismissed that crime is preserved for the other Soros prosecutors to charge Trump with, thereby avoiding double jeopardy).
 
Bucknut said:
Bragg has a number of problems, not that he cares. His goal is to drag this out and loom over the primary process, so mission accomplished.

First, it kinda sorta is about federal campaign finance law. The statute of limitations on Trump’s “crimes” is 2 years if misdemeanors, five years if felonies. You’ll kindly note these alleged infractions took place in 2015/2016. So full stop unless Bragg can link them to an underlying crime, which he failed to name in either the indictment or his press conference. We can only assume it’s federal election or campaign finance law.

So the question becomes, can Bragg turn (expired) state misdemeanors into federal (campaign finance) felonies, when the federal government has not (and in fact declined) to charge him with that same felony? It’s basically unheard of. Bragg is literally trying to charge Trump with state federal crimes. There is obviously no such thing.

I’m not defending Trump as a human, just opining on the case. It’s tenuous at best.

One other observation: the crux of the case seems to be that Trump sought to influence the election by paying Stormy hush money to keep news of their “affair” out of the news. An affair that took place in 2006. Does Bragg really think the voting public would have been swayed by this news, but they were not swayed by Trump being caught on tape just 3 weeks before the election admitting to grabbing women by the yoo-ho
Click to expand...
Whether these were misdemeanors or felonies will surely be debated, but one thing is crystal clear. The POTUS Donald J Trump, was according to New York law, comitting multiple crimes while occupying OUR Whitehouse and Oval Office.
 
Last edited:
rico said:
Whether these were misdemeanors of felonies we all seem to be missing the point the according to New York law the POTUS, Donald J Trump, was committing multiple crimes while occupying our Whitehouse and Oval Office.
Click to expand...
Fair enough. Except next week some rabid Republican prosecutor in, I don’t know, Des Moines (who ran on the promise of “getting” Biden) could indict him for God knows what. Indictments are soooo easy. And then we’re really off to the races at the Banana Republic Olympics. Be better to avoid that and just not elect him again, right? (Talking about Trump)
 
Last edited:
You would hope that America would be smart enough to not put Donald back in the Whitehouse, but anything is possible.

How do you feel about the POTUS sitting in the Oval Office committing 34 misdemeanor crimes as he falsifies business records in an attempt to squash a damaging story. Where do we as a nation draw the fucking line. How much should our leaders and elites be able to get away with.. I myself say nothing. Treat ‘em like the rest of us regardless of which side of the aisle they are on.

And if a state prosecutor somewhere has evidence that Biden committed crimes in his jurisdiction he has a duty to do his job and hold Biden accountable.
 
Last edited:
I agree in principle, except at that level they’re all guilty of something for an ambitious enough prosecutor. Just as an example, a Republican prosecutor could absolutely have indicted Hilllary on any number of charges a few years ago. Doesn’t mean he/she could prove them, or even that they’re legit, but some damage would have been done. Not a good look when talking about Presidential level figures. It really should be airtight and head smackingly obvious when we accuse them of crimes. So far, this isn’t.
 
Bucknut said:
I agree in principle, except at that level they’re all guilty of something for an ambitious enough prosecutor. Just as an example, a Republican prosecutor could absolutely have indicted Hilllary on any number of charges a few years ago. Doesn’t mean he/she could prove them, or even that they’re legit, but some damage would have been done. Not a good look when talking about Presidential level figures. It really should be airtight and head smackingly obvious when we accuse them of crimes. So far, this isn’t.
Click to expand...
How do you know?
No one has shown the public the evidence as of yet. You and those like you are assuming a lot. I keep hearing weak case coming from people, but those people, along with the rest of us have zero clue what evidence has been presented to the Grand Jury.
All you are going by is things you have heard from people who don't know either.
Why doesn't everybody chill out for a while and wait until the case has come to trial and see what the facts are as to how strong a case it is.
 
Bucknut said:
I agree in principle, except at that level they’re all guilty of something for an ambitious enough prosecutor. Just as an example, a Republican prosecutor could absolutely have indicted Hilllary on any number of charges a few years ago. Doesn’t mean he/she could prove them, or even that they’re legit, but some damage would have been done. Not a good look when talking about Presidential level figures. It really should be airtight and head smackingly obvious when we accuse them of crimes. So far, this isn’t.
Click to expand...
You are the one with the law degree so your opinion on the merits of this case holds a lot more weight than the rest of the riff raff around here.
 
rico said:
This is possibly the first time in history that someone has used the words intellectual and respected when discussing Old Bone Spur!

Kudos my friend as this is an amazing feat for which you should be proud..
Click to expand...

I know you missed the sarcasm, but you're welcome. My point has been confirmed. Lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom