Fu*%face Von Clownstick

HigherGroundArborist said:
This is a broad sweeping question. Please identify one lie, and I’ll be happy to discuss it.
Click to expand...
Just as I expected...100% weasel.

And...you didn't read the question. Slow down...read the question. It's not about any one lie. The simple question, once again:

rump has been credited with over 30k lies in the four years. How can you accept that as a marker of a person with integrity?
 
HigherGroundArborist said:
Diagnose “to analyze the cause or nature of” - Webster’s Online Dictionary
Click to expand...
Isnt that how you arrived at your opinion of Trump? Your argument is you must have a conversation with a person to be able to make a judgement, assessment or analyze them? You must have spent alot of time talking to Trump to arrive at your conclusions.
 
I think you need to! Or get some sort of elemental understanding of logic.

It is going to snow one day.
It has been three days and it hasn't snowed you are a liar.

Does this really need explaining?

First of all without specifying a time frame this statement can never be wrong.

Secondly, when making predictions about the future it is clearly a guess and allows for error as the outcome is unknown and this not a lie: just wrong.
 
Tom Dunlap said:
Just as I expected...100% weasel.

And...you didn't read the question. Slow down...read the question. It's not about any one lie. The simple question, once again:

rump has been credited with over 30k lies in the four years. How can you accept that as a marker of a person with integrity?
Click to expand...

Just because someone is credited with 30k lies in 4 years doesn’t mean it’s true. So, please pick 1 lie and let’s discuss it. This shouldn’t be hard for you because you have 30k to pick from.
 
treegongfu said:
I think you need to! Or get some sort of elemental understanding of logic.

It is going to snow one day.
It has been three days and it hasn't snowed you are a liar.

Does this really need explaining?

First of all without specifying a time frame this statement can never be wrong.

Secondly, when making predictions about the future it is clearly a guess and allows for error as the outcome is unknown and this not a lie: just wrong.
Click to expand...
Ok 1st watch the clips on more than one occassion he specifies time frame " by spring". Saying something that many times over the span of 3-6 months is lying, incompitent, or msihandling the situation take your pick.
treegongfu said:
I looked it up. It is Bezos' paper Washington Post that is the source of the 30k lies.
Click to expand...
Hold up 1 lie at a time.
treegongfu said:
I agree , liars tabulating lies. Who accredited the lies? Cnn? The are lairs, blood-soaked lairs. Wapo, lairs. Who?
Click to expand...
video camaras
 
treegongfu said:
I think you need to! Or get some sort of elemental understanding of logic.

It is going to snow one day.
It has been three days and it hasn't snowed you are a liar.

Does this really need explaining?

First of all without specifying a time frame this statement can never be wrong.

Secondly, when making predictions about the future it is clearly a guess and allows for error as the outcome is unknown and this not a lie: just wrong.
Click to expand...
Its going to snow One day. It has been 3 days and it hasnt snowed. This doesnt work the 1st statement One day cant then be changed to its been 3 days, thats changing the perameters of the 1st statement. These 2 statements are entirely different and cant be congruent. If it snowed on day 100 then the 1st statement would be true not a lie. Not sure what elemental means, let me check me dictionary I have it on hand, but your logic needs explaining.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom