I think tied the stopper on the Soft Sticht correctly for the first time today. Before I put the strands on the outside of the cross as in #289 but today I passed the tails through an eye formed between the crossing strands which I think is what you show in #326. That makes for better tending...
What took the place of the foot loop? You were stepping down on something I presume, as a strap on the knee taking full body weight doesn't sound pleasant.
I think I already have this. In the images in post #23 and you will see that the first one has more tension on the yellow side while the second one has more tension on the green side.
According to my simulation high bollard friction makes it easy to break a carabiner as the system will support...
It is important to distinguish chirality from different structural forms of the knot. Strictly speaking according to convention the bend you tied is not a double fisherman's as it has a different structural form. When you refer to a left-sided bowline do you mean an identical knot reflected...
Okay. I always tie it with the nesting coils as that is what I have seen pull tested, and it's the "correct" way in books and guides. Do you find a benefit to doing it the other way?
Pedantic but I think the double fisherman's knot at 1:20 was tied incorrectly. That coil should have been wrapped the other way. "Tying knots while talking" as you said.
I tried this physically now as I wanted to get a feel for it. I see how the friction can be used to hold more tension within the loop than the system settles into naturally, by manually cinching it down.
Does this have real-world implications however? I could not produce the effect by merely...
@Bart_ thanks for the longer explanation. That's going to take me some thinking and maybe a bit of experimentation, then I'll try to extend my model. You're referring to this post I think?
For this geometry and rope-bollard mu of 0.085 representing a slick rope around a steel bollard the system can be at equilibrium between these two limits. Angles outside this range would require more tension to be carried by friction than I calculate as possible.
@Bart_ I have it structured a little differently. Seeking a geometry with simple math I made the bollard a unit circle and fixed the carabiner in a horizontal orientation, then figured out the rope alignment and tensions from there. Of course it is more complicated now but I think it was a...
The model now corresponds to the observed case of no contact between the carabiner and bollard due to rope thickness.
Also a configuration similar to the 35 kN pull at 5:40 in the video with the exception of the T-shaped cross section that I have not yet modeled.
This update was a lot of work because most of the trig simplifications I used to set up the original broke down when I added dimension to the rope and carabiner. Nevertheless it was worth it as tail support from rope thickness seems to be a very significant factor. There are bugs to work out...