WTF Weaver?!?!

[Blinky]

I see what you mean Tom, why would we expect ANY of these organizations to actually advocate for climbers.

It's OBVIOUSLY not their job since there's no money or free executive travel involved.

 

[treewill]

[ QUOTE ]
I think the recent spate of failures was on really old ones. Not part of the recall but really old.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, one of the more recent failures was a bridge used for 12 weeks.

But then that's probably the climbers fault, right? I mean, he should have inspected the core of the bridge with his x-ray specs.

Better yet he should have inspected the tag, and when he saw it said 'Weaver' chucked it in the trash.

 

[classictruckman]

[ QUOTE ]

Better yet he should have inspected the tag, and when he saw it said 'Weaver' chucked it in the trash.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah in the can full of kong products

 

[bonner1040]

OK!

So the check cleared.

I called Weaver and told them this... Considering the recall on bridge 1.0 and the reported failures of bridge 2.0 that the I was not interested in a 3rd attempt, bridge 3.0.

I informed them that I had removed the bridge and that without a central tie in, that the saddle had no value to me and that I had, effectively wasted $250.

Long story short, I convinced them to refund me the cost of the CT rigging plates featured in the popular Liger conversion. It took almost a half dozen calls and over an hour or so on the phone as well as a bunch of emails but I recieved and cleared a check for $48, which is fine by me.

My reticence to post the details was only because I did not want my check to not come for whatever reason.