[ QUOTE ]
Tom,
Where's your science.. Don't make scientifically unsupported statements as though they are facts.. Anecdotally, I have not seen damage from natural crotch rigging..
Has anyone here ever seen it?
I'd like at least to see some pics..
Since this is a reasonable, not ego-based or insulting post post, I'll respond. Daniel you offer talking points which are a good contributions that lead to people learning different things. Its the other crap that is crap.
I see it all the time when I'm natural crotching. I only NC rigging lines on removal trees. I don't have any pictures, though. I've seen it strip off bark entirely, burning down through the cambium.
I subscribe the Do No Harm approach, and do what I can to protect keeper trees by not NCing in them without protection.
http://www.wesspur.com/Friction-Savers/friction-saver.html
For those not familiar, these leather cambium savers are cheap and easy install/ retrieve, remotely. They now are now available in 3/4" rope compatible ones . This helps with spliced eyes on ropes. This can allow a larger rope bend radius without having to install a block for some rigging scenarios. Ring and Ring friction savers have a poor bend radius for rigging. Static remove-settable/ removable false crotch techniques are good for some low impact rigging situations as well, but can be more difficult in some tight crotches.
These add the efficiency of NC rigging and rope friendly bend radius, yet the protection of a FC system, so I like having them. It would be good if their was a place to tie a little cord for clipping with a 'biner, as I unforetunately have found that they are sometimes easily lost, and hard to carry into the tree securely when not installed on the line.