ISA Code of Ethics/ CA with lowballer illegal op.

Since the original post, I have blown off some of the steam associated, and still feel that the implications are the same.

Again, I'll say that if this is an attempt to soon get legitimate, buy liability insurance, buy Worker's Comp (I believe that there was a "we" in the cottonwood job, but I may be mistaken, and in WA state only the owner can get a WRITTEN exemption for WC from WA State),buy a bond, buy a license, buy commercial auto, pay all the appropriate taxes that support the state that supports the school where he will be attending, then I really don't mind, aside from posting credentials and working illegally.
Gotta start somewhere, honestly.

Again, no measure to ID FTH to ISA has occurred on my end.



My insured, licensed, WC covered company, etc, etc WAS FINED $1000 for being out of compliance with the new bonding law that the Dept. of L&I didn't announce to those affected.

My bookkeeper has been warning me that L & I is after people. A roofer was on a worksite with his brother. A compliance officer came up, checked out the WC situation, and levied a large fine on him for non-compliance.


We all have ripple effects.
If I were to have to close up shop because of illegal competition making the market too tough to work safely in, three people would be out of jobs. My one groundman yesterday didn't show up. I was about to suspend him for a week without pay, but then later in the day I find out he is at the hospital with his mom. Her house just burned to the ground. Is this the guy that should be out of a job. And the same guy is having to pay $400/ month child support, trying to cover his responsibilities to his daughter.
Again, which one should lose out IF it is a win-lose (not win-win, which would be best) situation, someone that chose to give up work in this economy to go to live as a poor student without a nest egg, or me and my employees, and all the associated relations, including his hospital-bound mother. My other employee loves trees as well, and wants to learn to become a great climber (some spurless experience now), and maybe a CA in time (at least wants to learn good practices and understand tree function to a higher level).

If I were to go under, then
I wouldn't be donating wood chips to the local school garden project,
Left Foot Organics, the organic farm that works with developmentally-challenged adults (also helping with their trees and contributing to their fundraising auction),
the Wild Felid Advocacy Center (an exotic cat rescue Non-profit in Olympia.
GRuB (Garden Raised Bounty) would not be getting chips for their new education center where they help teach people to provide themselves with good organic produce at home so that they/ their families can eat better.
I wouldn't be accumulating firewood, and going to my expense to meet up with some cold families with kids that are advertising on CL, asking if anyone can spare some wood 'cause the kids are cold and they don't have the money for the heating gas. Last winter, the kid asked his mom, "Do you think that we can fit all that wood in the car?" I stacked it for them Tetris-style to make it fit.
I wouldn't be able to finish a Drop and Leave job cheaply that the family of 7 started with a lombardi poplar over their water main. They were sending their kids up the tree one branch at a time, unless their courage held up for two branches. Then they would switch and harness up another kid and send him up the stubs to cry to cut off limbs in the wind next to a High Power Primary.
They were just trying to get by and were happy to just have it down without more damage to their house (their cutting efforts) or fearing the plumbing bill like the people across the street, cheaply.

I think that a lot of companies, and individuals, help out the community, so I'm saying that I'm not doing something revolutionary or special. Just illustrating that ripples go a long way beyond someone's pocketbook.





Following are two CL ads that I posted, in addition to ones directly promoting my services.

TREE TOPPING IS RIDICULOUS (ALL TREES)
Date: 2009-10-08, 11:48AM PDT
Reply to: serv-de7wf-1412420272@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]

TREE TOPPING IS ONE OF THE MOST HARMFUL PRACTICES YOU CAN DO TO A TREE.

YOU WILL WASTE YOUR MONEY ON CREATION OF FUTURE HAZARDS!

ANY REPUTABLE TREE PERSON WILL KNOW THAT THIS IS VERY, VERY HARMFUL.

DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE YOU WASTE YOUR MONEY!

DON'T AMPUTATE YOUR TREE. IT IS A LIVING ORGANISM THAT WILL BE GREATLY DAMAGED, MUCH LIKE IF A PERSON DECIDED TO CUT OF THEIR LEGS WITH A CHAINSAW, EXCEPT FOR THAT ANIMALS HEAL. TREES NEVER, EVER HEAL. EVER. THEY RESPOND TO WOUNDING DIFFERENTLY THAN HEALING. ITS A FACT!



All Legal Tree Services must have: License, Bond,Liability&WorkCompIns (Wa State)
Date: 2009-10-06, 6:51AM PDT
Reply to: sean@southsoundtree.com [Errors when replying to ads?]

All legally operating tree services must have a:

Business License which will have a UBI number 602 xxx xxx,
Liability Insurance for tree trimming or removal, as appropriate to services performed,
A Contractor's License and Bond
Industrial Insurance/ Worker's Comp through WA State Dept of Labor and Industries (L&I) for all employees aside from the owner (optional for the legal owner).

Check out your contractor at www.lni.wa.gov get a current certificate of insurance!
Protect yourself!

A legitimate contractor must post their Contractor's License number in all written advertising, which will look similar to SOUTHST913JO.
All ISA-Certified Arborists must post their certification number with written advertisements, which will look similar to PN-6626a, for Pacific Northwest arborists, with other regions having a different locality code.

DON'T TOP TREES! DON'T TOP TREES! DON'T TOP TREES! DON'T TOP TREES!
DON'T TOP TREES! DON'T TOP TREES!
Its a waste of money on an outdated procedure that greatly damages trees, leading to secondary problems like root rot, insect infestation, poor/ dangerous regrowth that means expensive maintenance.
Trees should be properly cared for, or removed.
Climbing spikes are ONLY FOR REMOVALS. Look in arborist supply magazines and arborist supply websites. You will never see spike climbing on trimming/ pruning!!!!!!!!!!!

FOR SCIENTIFICALLY BASED KNOWLEDGE FROM LEADING INDUSTRY PROFESSIONALS, NOT WHAT GRANDPA BOB ALWAYS DID, SEE:

www.isa-arbor.org THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE

and

www.treesaregood.org ISA's CONSUMER HELP WEBSITE

and

www.tcia.org THE TREE CARE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, FORMERLY THE NATIONAL ARBORISTS ASSOCIATION

If you are thinking about topping your trees, think again, don't waste your money on a damaging, outdated practice.

* Location: Wa State
* it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
*
* License info: SOUTHST913JO, Insured for $1M, Bonded



Yes, this week has had more people breaking into treework (legally?/ Illegally?) advertising TOPPING and LIMB REMOVAL (properly?/ improperly?)

------------------------------------------------------------

What might be great is if there were a written and practical test for any persons performing tree care, with enforcement against people "hacking" and "topping".
Removals and grinding would just have to follow OSHA type regs and state laws for business.
 
[ QUOTE ]
The kid is being used as a whipping post in this forum for all the bad that many older people have wantonly done, and you feel so just to point the finger at him to use as an example.

He's a young man on the learning path of a career and for all you know he could end up being the president of the ISA. Don't think so? He's young enough and has the time to do it.

These witch hunt threads are as old as time and the worst example of all mankind.

And not a good example at all of what Buzz forum is all about. Need I quote again the mission statement of what the Tree Buzz forum is about? It certainly isn't about ganging up on young people starting out.

Grown men ganging up on a school kid. Real tough guys.

[/ QUOTE ]



I agree, Hang a man for Passion, we all want to eat.
Jeff
 
[ QUOTE ]
After this I'm sure funky tree hugger isn't going to be so open about his work interests with anyone anywhere. But there will be more like him that will run ads, and the internet watch dogs will pounce on them and tear'em up.

And there's certainly some people that should be. But for a young man starting out a little helpful advise from others would go a lot farther towards teaching them ethics.

I'll let it go at that.

[/ QUOTE ]

The other illegal people that run ads are not the competition for an arborist service, unlike illegally operating arborists, which are the competition on the uneven playing field.

People seeing the typical ads run by unlicensed, uninsured, non-tax paying tree operations are the contrast that help the CA credential (if the work style follows the knowledge base) mean something. This contrast helps CAs be seen as professionals, deserving of professional wages, helping them stay in the profession.

The businesses that employ CAs/ people of quality knowledge should be able to charge appropriate rates for their services.

Getting adequate compensation is what could, on the one hand line the business owner's pockets, or it could be what pays for training, PPE, health insurance, a reasonable/ safe production level, vacation pay, sick pay, 401K, etc.
 
[ QUOTE ]
ISA CA (edit)plainly operating illegal operation (edit)and blatantly advertising on the internet that he will undercut all the local legally-operating CAs.

Do you think that the ISA has any qualms with this?
 
"What might be great is if there were a written and practical test for any persons performing tree care, with enforcement against people "hacking" and "topping".
Removals and grinding would just have to follow OSHA type regs and state laws for business."

Great, or greatly destructive? Sean, a cadre of Pruning Police would push arborists to sell removals instead of reductions, for fear of getting busted by agents whose "laws" might be based on junk science like the 1/3 Rule, and way outdated. Meanwhile, companies pushing removals, where pruning might work better for tree and client, just have to be legal and safe?

Nightmare scenario.

When I started leaving "long stubs" on storm-damaged trees, one govt arborist called my work "a preposterous truckload of tripe". If he had a tool to go after me I believe he would have. But since then the practice has been widely accepted, and in pubs by Gilman etc.

So when it comes to enforcement, be careful what you wish for.
 
[ QUOTE ]
"What might be great is if there were a written and practical test for any persons performing tree care, with enforcement against people "hacking" and "topping".
Removals and grinding would just have to follow OSHA type regs and state laws for business."

Great, or greatly destructive? Sean, a cadre of Pruning Police would push arborists to sell removals instead of reductions, for fear of getting busted by agents whose "laws" might be based on junk science like the 1/3 Rule, and way outdated. Meanwhile, companies pushing removals, where pruning might work better for tree and client, just have to be legal and safe?

Nightmare scenario.

When I started leaving "long stubs" on storm-damaged trees, one govt arborist called my work "a preposterous truckload of tripe". If he had a tool to go after me I believe he would have. But since then the practice has been widely accepted, and in pubs by Gilman etc.

So when it comes to enforcement, be careful what you wish for.

[/ QUOTE ]


Guy-

I appreciate your input. I stated that it "might be great" kinda hoping for the flipside of the coin to be offered, as you did.

What do you think, if anything, would help to raise the standards appropriately?


Do people that have state licenses/ laws governing tree care have any insight?




Not meaning to derail the thread there.
Does anyone have any input on whether the ISA SHOULD or WOULD step in on such a case of a CA advertising in writing as has happened, where it is pretty much proof positive (unless there is a conspiracy where a begrudged person would fabricate someone else offering such services illegally).
After re-visiting isa-arbor.org is just saw that it was peppered with "professional" and hire a "professional company" and providing "professional services" to property owners. This was the original question.
 
[ QUOTE ]
What do you think, if anything, would help to raise the standards appropriately?

[/ QUOTE ] Highlight good work. Challenge rules that do not work. [ QUOTE ]

Does anyone have any input on whether the ISA SHOULD or WOULD step in on such a case of a CA advertising in writing as has happened,

[/ QUOTE ]read the ethics statements; do you see anything that may apply? that would give you the Could. as for the other two rhyming words, that's outside the scope of what i can see.
bigeyes.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]


I agree, Hang a man for Passion, we all want to eat.
Jeff

[/ QUOTE ]

There are others who have similar aspirations, and take as they go.

[ QUOTE ]
30 Men do not despise a thief, if he steal to satisfy his soul when he is hungry; 31 But if he be found, he shall restore sevenfold; he shall give all the substance of his house.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stealing is breaking the law, just as illegal tree work is breaking the law. One takes money and stuff from others, the other takes potential income from others. Although an illegal worker does some work, the similarity of taking can't be erased.

The question remains, where do you draw the line between doing something wrong to satisfy your soul, and doing something wrong when there are alternatives?

How would you draw the line?
 
Re: ISA Code of Ethics/ CA with lowballer illegal

mdvaden, are you really comparing someone who is solicitating work to be the same as stealing? how ridiculously absurd. if i work for free/charity, which ive done for poor veterans and private schools, am i stealing? thats gotta be the most idiotic post yet.
 
[ QUOTE ]


How would you draw the line?

[/ QUOTE ]

I WOULDN'T draw a line.

I prefer to focus on educating customers and promoting my own business. Trying to eliminate competition, legal or otherwise is negative and counter-productive.

...and frankly, the way we make laws in this country, 'legal' is a dubious term. The law condones stealing of all sorts so long as you dot your i's, cross your t's, pay the right people and don't say the wrong thing to the wrong person.


You guys need to get over this and hoe your own row.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly the ISA is not going to do anything.Ive seen it over and over guys posting something about another ca or a company and wondering what the isa is gonna do -nothing.That particular issue is that guys buisness and his employer if evergreen doesnt care hes moonlighting than more power to him.If that dude wants to give his services away for nothing so be it.He may be a really crappy arborist anyway who does lousy work.I use to the think being a CA was something special but its just a really easy test that any high school drop out can pass with a little study time.Thats all it is ive seen people who have never climbed a tree pass the test.They need to raise the bar make the test harder and put in a field test also audit the canidate in the field-plus help start local and state arborist licesnes with manditory insurance requirements-you know like plumbers and electricians.Or the easy route start and ethics policy that demands arborist to turn in each other for there apparent violations and make them sign an agreement stating as much.Wait they already did.Why put restraints on the guys that are actually trying to be prfesssional why go after them at all.My problem is not with the 20 or so CAs we have in town.Its with 500 little startups who do nothing by the book and low ball the local industry.The isa has no juridictiction with them they can do nothing.well they could they could influence local and state government to make the ness regulations like I stated, but then they would have to relinquesh control, power and influence-never gonna happen.Wait in minute I do have a problem with some CAs.The ones who come across as being really critical of others who are breaking the same standards.But find some weird way to justify there own actions but slamming others.take off the blind fold.

[/ QUOTE ]
Jimmy not so crazy
 
Re: ISA Code of Ethics/ CA with lowballer illegal

[ QUOTE ]
mdvaden, are you really comparing someone who is solicitating work to be the same as stealing? how ridiculously absurd. if i work for free/charity, which ive done for poor veterans and private schools, am i stealing? thats gotta be the most idiotic post yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've done charity too. Of course it was legal, and seems to neutralize your point.

Stealing is illegal, and advertsing tree work are illegal. The similarity is that both are breaking the law.

[ QUOTE ]


I WOULDN'T draw a line.

I prefer to focus on educating customers and promoting my own business. Trying to eliminate competition, legal or otherwise is negative and counter-productive.


[/ QUOTE ]

Blinky ... first, good avatar - THE LORAX

THE LORAX at Youtube

I'd draw a line but agree with you on the latter part. The government pretty much had that job lined up. And really, when folks advertise illegally openly, they've done more than half the work of turning themselves in.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom