Matias
Been here much more than a while
- Location
- Silicon Valley
Of course. Maybe I didn't think through my words enough, but he is admitting that there was no evidence of fraud, right? His claim is that neither side can prove anything, which is not exactly true, but without paper ballots, hypothetically possible. But again, it is a hypothesis without any evidence. My point is that all those words he wrote add up to zero.Let be crystal fucking clear here. There was and is no evidence of widespread corruption in the 2020 election. That is why Trump lost over 60 court cases in his pursuit of over turning the election, and why his lawyers could never supply any evidence when the Judges demanded that they do so in a court of law..That's how it works here in Merica mutherfuckers.
And you do realize that the conversation that Daniel claims he had with the "candidate in a neighboring county that clearly lost due to cheating" didn't actually happen?
