Fu*%face Von Clownstick

You mean city vs rural? Not sure offhand, but I know where I’d rather live. Also a bit of a loaded stat, as 1 murder in a town of 500 people looks horrendous on a per capita basis but doesn’t mean the town is terribly violent. I understand the same holds true for larger cities, but they produce about the same numbers year after year, unlike small towns or counties. I guess I’d rather be in the place with the fewest total murders, per capita or not.
 
Sadly the data does not support your "gut", and instead supports the fact that red states strongly lead the way when it comes to murder rates per capita-

Screenshot 2023-10-08 at 9.52.32 AM.png
 
You’re not paying attention. In every case above, the VAST majority of murders occur in democrat run cities. If you want to blame the 90% of Tennesseans who live peacefully in the suburbs or country for the huge number of murders committed in the ghettos of Nashville, Knoxville and Memphis, ok I guess?

You know better. Trust your gut.

IMG_2073.jpeg
 
Who are the most likely people, in relationship to the victims, to be the perpetrators?
Random strangers or known relatives or known enemies?


IF it's gang member on gang member violence or clan member on rival clan member violence or husband/ boyfriend on partner violence, it doesn't matter where I live.

If it's random violence, it does.
 
Posting from an opinion piece that cites undoctored statistics in support of its thesis.

We’re adults here. We have functioning eyes and brains. Where do you suppose more “random violence” happens? South side of Chicago or downtown Eddyville, Illinois? (Yes, it’s a real town in the southern part of the state). Where would you feel safer walking with your kids at night to get some ice cream? We all know the answer. A few of us aren’t afraid to admit it.
 
Bucknut said:
You’re not paying attention. In every case above, the VAST majority of murders occur in democrat run cities. If you want to blame the 90% of Tennesseans who live peacefully in the suburbs or country for the huge number of murders committed in the ghettos of Nashville, Knoxville and Memphis, ok I guess?

You know better. Trust your gut.

View attachment 90520
Click to expand...
Like that maga hat wearing fool who shot a native man who was protecting others in New Mexico recently. Damn dem’s allowing free speech in towns, they can’t even protect from the radical right. Twisted logic there Buck
 
Bucknut said:
You’re not paying attention. In every case above, the VAST majority of murders occur in democrat run cities. If you want to blame the 90% of Tennesseans who live peacefully in the suburbs or country for the huge number of murders committed in the ghettos of Nashville, Knoxville and Memphis, ok I guess?

You know better. Trust your gut.

View attachment 90520
Click to expand...
Oh I’m paying attention, but I ain’t buying what your selling. The big cities scenario you are describing also happen in blue states, yet it Is the reds states that consistently have disproportionately high per capita murders rates. Why is that?
 
Well gosh…. I guess the only possible answer is… Trump? Lol.

It’s because red states are much less populated than Cali or NY. Which dramatically bumps up “per capita” numbers.
 
Bucknut said:
Well gosh…. I guess the only possible answer is… Trump? Lol.

It’s because red states are much less populated than Cali or NY. Which dramatically bumps up “per capita” numbers.
Click to expand...
Then why aren’t places like Vermont, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Maine experiencing high per capita murder rates comparable to those in Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, and South Carolina?

Trump isn’t the disease that is currently afflicting America, he is just a symptom.
 
Last edited:
Interesting times. Enforcing a “no speech” rule against a leading candidate for President is certainly a new tactic. Imagine the logistical (and political) nightmare that would ensue if she actually tried to enforce this and jail him. Although from all available evidence she seems the type.

I do wonder, having not read the actual gag order, what the specific limitations are. Could trump simply issue statements/tweets through a “spokesman” as a workaround?
 
It is not a no speech rule. It just limits him from verbally attacking the court staff, witnesses, and jury members. Things sane people do not do, but Trump is not sane. I think this judge will throw him in jail if he violates the order, and rightly so. She said he can verbally attack the other candidates, or the president all he wants, but it is not going to happen to the members of the judicial system. But the asshole will not behave. Acceptable human conduct is beyond his reach.
 
Bucknut said:
Interesting times. Enforcing a “no speech” rule against a leading candidate for President is certainly a new tactic. Imagine the logistical (and political) nightmare that would ensue if she actually tried to enforce this and jail him. Although from all available evidence she seems the type.

I do wonder, having not read the actual gag order, what the specific limitations are. Could trump simply issue statements/tweets through a “spokesman” as a workaround?
Click to expand...
As Shadow said, this is a limited order in which Donald will no longer be allowed the harass, intimidate, attack, or threaten persons (witness, prosecutors, judges) involved in his DC case..No one else would have been allowed to say the things he has been saying concerning all of his various court cases, so why should it be any different for Donny Dearest? Lets remember that Donny is currently nothing more than someone running for public office. Does this make him so special that he alone should be allowed to break multiple pre-release agreements, and threaten and intimidate witnesses, prosecutors, and judges with impunity? This judge is simply doing her job and making sure that this trial is fair, and fair swings both ways my friend.
 
Last edited:
If it were as severe as Trump wants you to believe, his campaign would have circulated the document online to point out how egregious it is, how no one in history before him (NO ONE!) ever suffered such a fate, and how unfairly he is being persecuted - which he can't differentiate from prosecuted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom