Fu*%face Von Clownstick

WoooEeeee!

The Department of Justice unsealed the 37-count indictment against Donald Trump on Friday, a document that laid out a stunning case against the former president.
Trump, who was ordered to appear in federal court in Miami, Fla., on Tuesday, has been charged with 37 felony counts — including 31 counts under the Espionage Act — that carry stiff prison sentences upon conviction.

His lawyers are abandoning the sinking ship in numbers.
 
Last edited:
Shadowscape said:
WoooEeeee!

The Department of Justice unsealed the 37-count indictment against Donald Trump on Friday, a document that laid out a stunning case against the former president.
Trump, who was ordered to appear in federal court in Miami, Fla., on Tuesday, has been charged with 37 felony counts — including 31 counts under the Espionage Act — that carry stiff prison sentences upon conviction.

His lawyers are abandoning the sinking ship in numbers.
Click to expand...
A stiff prison sentence means that Trump would most likely die behind bars. A fitting end for one of the most disgraceful persons in American history.
 
Simply responding to the statement that the Republican Party has gone insane. I won’t even argue the point. But pretending the Dems are the “sane” party is a bit much. Many (if not most) nationally prominent Dems will tell you that men can literally become pregnant. I don’t know if they really believe this, or if they fear being called a bigot more than they respect physical reality. I have my suspicions.
 
Bucknut said:
And the first current American president to weaponize his DOJ to imprison his chief political rival, ironically for a crime he himself is also guilty of. RIP American exceptionalism. The world laughs at us.

P.S. I don’t think Trump can win, and I’ve developed quite a distaste for him and his childishness. But don’t be surprised if his numbers go up. He will likely run on a promise to pardon himself. That should fire up the base.
Click to expand...
It's all Too True!
 
Bucknut said:
Many (if not most) nationally prominent Dems will tell you that men can literally become pregnant.
Click to expand...
Where in the world did you come to this conclusion? I would like to see where you get your information, please show it to us. Or are you just making it up like the rest of the Republicans? Goes along with Jewish space lasers and Democrats eat babies. And now it seems some Republicans want to kill people.
You have zero ground to stand on in this fight, so don't even try.
 
Bucknut said:
Many (if not most) nationally prominent Dems will tell you that men can literally become pregnant.
Click to expand...
Bucknut

You've been asked politely several times to backup what you say.

Even for the boundaries of Tree Free Zone you're going way off. You're on target to land in Time Out corner.

Time for some links, even from Faux Entertainment et al.
 
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
 
Bucknut said:
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
Click to expand...
Listen to the Biden clip again. He is talking about abortion bans and how they effect woman and his final word MEN was that it effects men also because men after all are the 2nd part of the pregnancy equation. He was not saying it affects men because they are banned from abortion. This is an example of out of context cherry picking garbage.
 
I’ll extend this olive branch: not even Joe knows what the hell he was saying. Then or now.

Do I dare ask you: What is a woman? (Hint: it’s not complicated)

For the record, I’m willing to drop this derail topic and get back to talking all things Trump unless y’all want to keep going.
 
Bucknut said:
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
Click to expand...
I am happy to engage in intelligent conversation with. you. Gender and what biology someone is assigned at birth is not the same thing. Woman and "human female" are not interchangable. One is gender one is biological assignment. Funny how people ramble on about how much cense the Trinty makes but cant wrap their mind around this. Who am I to say what people should believe and think in their own heart and mind. People are asking to be respected so I give this respect. Freedom doesnt mean having to like what others want or express. No one is saying a human assigned male at birth can be preganent, a human assigned female at birth who identifies as a man (gender) can get preganent. People are simply respect their request to be identified by their choosen gender. Your arguement insists on refusing to respect how someone views themselves.
 
Last edited:
Bucknut said:
I’ll extend this olive branch: not even Joe knows what the hell he was saying. Then or now.

Do I dare ask you: What is a woman? (Hint: it’s not complicated)

For the record, I’m willing to drop this derail topic and get back to talking all things Trump unless y’all want to keep going.
Click to expand...
Come on Buck, prety clear what Joe is talking about, admittely a bit garbled and stuttery but he is talking that abortion bans take away womens rights. Agree or disagree thats what that short cut out snipit was. titling it men can get preganent and abortions is totally dishonest. And yes defination of a woman is complicated for some people, maybe not you but for some people. Compassion and respect for others is the root here. I invite you to think on this.
 
Last edited:
Bucknut said:
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
Click to expand...
In this 1st video this guy looks like a total ass. The doctor answered his question. he was just too blind and arragant to relize she anwsered it. Then he bullied and kept interupting her when he didnt get the answer he wanted. He wasnt looking for an answer. He was projecting. He was doing exactly what he accused her of doing. Sad defense of your arguement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom