JeffGu
Been here much more than a while
- Location
- Osceola, Nebraska
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh. Echo doesn't make a big tophandle that is in the same class.Why buy a $700ish saw that needs a mod that may shorten its lifespan? Love a good Stihl, but brand loyalty when its gutless...
I mean, if we're going to post pictures of stupid shit that isn't worth discussing...
Looking at the direction of the gun and where the tree was on the ground indeed it did go left.
It looks like it fell exactly where the notch was pointed. They tend to do that.
I see what you are saying. Actually the hinge on the right having not defined apex acted like a dutchmen making the tree swing to the left. The tree being dead didnt really swing far enough and broke too soon. Looking at the direction of the gun and where the tree was on the ground indeed it did go left. Why not just gun more to the left and not rely on unpredictable dead hinge wood?
I agree re cut the danger side first. Personaly I would leave the bar in the tree and bring it round without removing it for a second back cut.
355t is just shy of 36cc, lighter, starts first pull when warm, spools up immediately and is half the cost. A professionally modded one will still be cheaper than 201 stock. Sharp chain on 14” bar and it rips all day in hardwood. 201 is better balanced though.
Not according to the manufacturers. 8.16lb 201vs 8lb 355, not that is much of a difference and bar options are many. Currently running a tsumura on mine (only a few months into it so jury is out).201 is also lighter
I ain't nobody's boy, just looking at the top shot. It was aimed right at that swingset. I'd draw a line in MS paint if I was on a computer.The boys can't get it straight Jeff
I didn't mean to dis you witty. Scott was talking nonsense, not you. The piece did actually go exactly where it was gunned. I was merely pointing out to Jeff that there is plenty of room for discussion on the matter. Scott misinterpreted the photo because the camera angle was not in line with the notch.I ain't nobody's boy, just looking at the top shot. It was aimed right at that swingset. I'd draw a line in MS paint if I was on a computer.
So what your saying is that you were in fact to lazy to do this tree in a manner that would have resulted in NO PROPERTY DAMAGE, and that your laziness resulted in both a smashed swingset and a damaged maple.... 2 for 1 bro!Yours truly Greg.
Here's the set up: the tree had front lean. There was a zero liability agreement, due to how dead the tree was, and that the electric company's contractor Asplundh refuse to cut the tree, and that I was saving them a couple of thousand dollars over the next lowest bid.
The new homeowners were an older couple with no kids and were going to have the swingset removed. The only stipulation on the contract was that if I took the maple out, I would remove it, which I did not want to do as it was a long way to the driveway.
As you can see, the lowest limb on the maple got damaged, so the top was just barely able to clear the maple. I thought the top would have the distance to clear the swingset before the limb on the right hit, so I was slightly disappointed that the swingset got hit, but was much happier that the maple did not.
After that.. it's all right there in front of you.
If money is your measuring stick for your personal ability in residential tree care, you will not ever be as good as you could be.You guys keep talking krapp
I'll keep putting money in the bank.
didn't start work til after lunch today
this is 4 hours later View attachment 67375