For less chance of the saw getting snatched if the piece falls unexpectedly? I just looked up three different tree youtubers snap-cut videos out of curiosity and saw people doing it both ways. Neither cut order has ever given me problems personally.
and it won't until it does... you should have seen the look of surprise on my face the first time a saw ever got ripped out of my hands and went for a ride with the limb all the way to the ground..
funny that this subject should come up here as this was the thing I wrote to the ANSI committee about.. they were still showing the three point cut circa 2006.. then there was an asterick and at the bottom of the page it said (see appendix x)
When you turned to appendix x, there was an entire page with only one sentence saying something to the effect that this cut to be used on small limbs under 2-3" diameter...
LIKE WHY THE FUCK WOULDN'T THEY HAVE JUST PUT THAT ONE LITTLE SENTENCE WITH THE DIAGRAM ?
we don't need a treasure hunt when there was plenty of room to put that sentence in the body of the copy. The fact they did that shows that they are either total idiots, or that they are intentionally keeping knowledge occutled (hidden).
Now I was recommending that the entire three point cut diagram be removed. They write back and told me that they were going to place the warning to only use this on small cuts with the digram rather than in the appendix. When the new pruning standard came out, the warning was still in the appendix...
ANd last I checked the three point cut diagram was still in the standard. My latest copy has disappeared, but I think that was 2016 or 2017... These guys are complete morons. given how foolish that diagram is and the fact that it's close to 40 years out of date, why would ANYONE LISTEN TO ANYTHING THESE PEOPLE HAVE TO SAY?
I HAVE ZERO RESPECT FOR ANYONE THAT PUTS THAT DIAGRAM OUT (after 1985)
ps.. have fun with the go pro.. and drop that back cut under..