drop a 75' tree in a 50' LZ

Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

[ QUOTE ]
You mentioned the adj. friction saver and srt which reduce the risk but isn't the hip to hip lanyard what crushes you?

[/ QUOTE ]

The Buckingham Ring and Ring False crotch

http://www.sherrilltree.com/Professional-Gear/Friction-Management/std_frc_saver_2, and probably other systems


with the adjustable prussic-ring combo, as used in the little picture on the right side of the web link page, when a tree splits, MAY be able to push the rings apart, into the climber's friction hitch, compressing the hitch, and allowing it to slide, keeping the crush factor out.

P1030131.jpg

I usually have the two carabiners of this system attached to my bridge, with a wire-core lanyard from D-to-D ring.

If I fear a split (and in other situations), I will use a Adjustable False Crotch DdRT, with a lanyard. I will position myself with the AFC with my wire cord flipline clipped back it itself, choking the tree, and keep it on the regular D, or move it to my bridge. The lanyard becomes back up to the climbline.

or

I will use a choked running bowline with a GriGri (or a F8 Revolver system or Unicender, I believe would work as an SRT system).



The split sounds like it could have been operator error/ judgment error, not knocking the climber or anything. That sounded like the textbook situation to have this split, but maybe the hazard was not mitigated by cutting technique. You'll have to correct me if I misunderstood any of the situational factors/ techniques.




I just had to remove a nasty leaning red alder Alnus rubra, known for barberchaining, which had a heavy lean, but no wind.

Wind will act on the tree like a heavier lean, building the internal stresses/ forces.


I used a ratchet strap above the face cut on the alder, to reduce the likelihood of a barber chair and spar split.

I used a small face cut. I don't think really mattered if it was conventional, Humboldt, or open-face/ birdbeak.

Before of after the face cut, preferably before, use Kerf Cuts in the side of the spar, a few inches below the proposed hinge area.

With the face cut and kerf cuts in place, I bore-cut in the holding wood, set up my hinge thickness as I wanted it, continued the bore-cut of the remaining holding wood, cutting toward the BackStrap of holding wood. Pulled out the saw, and nipped the BackStrap, using a Snap-cut technique with my final cut below the bore-cut.

No sign of any splitting it either the top or the spar.

Hope that was clear enough. Different people use different names for the same cuts, so I sorta tried to clarify the names by using capital letters, at times.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

a notch is a notch wether it is rightside up or upside down. The only reason for a humbolt is to save lumber for a log. It will not come over any different. The tree doesnt care. If you make a shallow notch than it will break off before nosing in, maybe.. it also might catch a side and still nose dive.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

[ QUOTE ]
a notch is a notch wether it is rightside up or upside down. The only reason for a humbolt is to save lumber for a log. It will not come over any different. The tree doesnt care. If you make a shallow notch than it will break off before nosing in, maybe.. it also might catch a side and still nose dive.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe that a Humboldt notch, with the back cut even with the horizontal of the face cut, has a built-in anti-jump-back-over-the-stump mechanism to it, whereas the conventional face cut needs a stump-shot as an anti-jump-back-over-the-stump mechanism. This is important to use if your top will brush/ push into other tree tops as it falls.


Would you all agree, or not?



Yes, a humboldt facecut will save "scale" on a butt log when you are groundfelling, plus it falls out of the cut when you connect the kerfs, which can help if it is a large facecut, especially on steep ground.

A conventional facecut will save scale on the top log, if the top of the tree is a non-marketable size, as the notch comes out of the wood in the top, not the top marketable log. This is a much smaller savings than on the butt log, unless it means that the log is in the next size catagory that the log yard is requesting (say you end up with a 16' log, not a 16 foot log plus 6" of "trim", bumping you into the 12' pricing per thousand board-feet.


A birdbeak/ open-faced notch will reduce the forces on the spar if you are catching a top. Sorry, I don't have a link to the mechanics of this.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

Daniel, sorry if this seems derailed into felling/ topping technique, but it seems to play into the scenario.

I would be more comfortable with a bore-cut backcut on a huge top to reduce the likelihood of splitting the tree on either side.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

a few years back a guy from a local bartlett office dropped about 50% of the top of a tree and got seriously f'd up. he was ping ponged so hard that he got a major concussion and lost the hearing in one ear. i dont think he ever returned to the biz.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

Sean, That was how it was described to me. I wasn't there until the next day. The wood was already cleaned up and I finished the tree but don't recall what the face cut looked like... it was oak stem, he was tied into a parallel codom, ~18" wood where he cut it. The ground guys said it looked ugly but he got out of the hospital that same night.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

[ QUOTE ]
a few years back a guy from a local bartlett office dropped about 50% of the top of a tree and got seriously f'd up. he was ping ponged so hard that he got a major concussion and lost the hearing in one ear. i dont think he ever returned to the biz.

[/ QUOTE ]

Another risk factor...the reverberating spar...an important point.

Not to suggest that half a tree is the way to drop it, but if one were to go huge, it would be better to drop the top, then limb the base of the tree, in order to dampen the movement. This would also have more mass on the bottom, which the top would have to energize into movement. Larger mass, less effect by the reactive force.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

Ah, the rush to get it done. Go with a 25' top and retain the longer log which will result in more marketable wood if that is a possibility. The smaller top also gives you a better chance to gauge wind effect and how far that piece will go beyond the base of the tree. Imagine if you will that the wind carries that longer 50' top say 5-10' beyond the base. Where does it land now? On the neighbouring property? Garden? Shed? Garage? House? Fence? Unless you're accurately measuring everything the big top theory is playing with fire for this and all the aforementioned reasons. As for cut, if it has a lean and can accommodate a bore cut, that's the way I go. Just did a red maple with a major lean. The Humboldt is nice as it will set the butt to slide off vs. pushing back and jumping off as with a conventional notch.

Work to see another day with all your faculties intact!
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If there is any chance of the top catching something on the way down, its necessary to cut a humboldt, otherwise a well made conventional notch and back cut should allow a safe release well away from the climber..

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't mean to preach, but climbers should not be using a conventional notch to take out a top. I've heard of some pretty grusome stories about reverse barber chairs, it actually happened to one of our very experienced climbers the other day. Thankfully he didn't get crushed. A humbolt will eliminate that threat and I find that pieces actually come over easier.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont see how the conventional notch caused this problem for your climber. I understand the barber chair/split but, a well laid felling plan (due to lean, wind and speicies) would have dictated a bore cut to get most of the back cut completed and hinge set before it began to fall to prevent the split. I havent used the humbolt a lot but dont see how it would have prevented it from happening.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

Why take all the unnecessary risk? I have seen over-confidence lead to somewhat less than desirable outcomes.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

[ QUOTE ]
a few years back a guy from a local bartlett office dropped about 50% of the top of a tree and got seriously f'd up. he was ping ponged so hard that he got a major concussion and lost the hearing in one ear. i dont think he ever returned to the biz.

[/ QUOTE ]

There has been lots of incidents like this, this is basic tree work 101 I can't even believe it's being debated. A fellow in the valley here died two years ago doing just this, bushy tree, more top than stump, ground guys didn't even see him get hurt.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

See all the spars? There's about 120 of them. Every one of those trees were 150-190'. Every one took minimum two cuts. Do it safely every time or you might not get a chance try again, ever.
 

Attachments

  • 227415-0013.webp
    227415-0013.webp
    391.6 KB · Views: 236
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

what's the story on that job, Gord? Did you guys leave all the standing snags for some reason?
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

There was just a video on here of a top coming back on a ladder operator and sending him flying.
I like that saying"go small and go home".
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

The client wanted short spars to dig out (root wads included) and build a salmon spawning habitat/channel.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

Just droped the top 50' of a way dead ash tree today.. got it on tape.. nasty tree... Lot of head lean.. lot of rot and decay, gaffs sunk completely on every step and kicked out a few times in total dust.. There was a little hole into which the tree might fit between other big trees.. I didn't want to piece out the top because some was leaning back, and I just didn't trust it, (though I could have possibly tied into an adjacent tree).. it was just easier to take the whole top as it had a clear head lean.. scary bit of work... ended up not getting it to turn much and missing the hole. The top crashed into a monster white oak... Big wood on the ash just blew up and surprisingly only broke one small (maybe 3") limb on the white oak... No other damage..

Might be some time before the video goes up..

Of course i was concerned that some part of the top would come back at me or some broken limb get thrown back from the oak, but luickily nothing like that... there was no where to go, all I could do was stand in the hooks and watch..

You may think that sounds dangerous and you'd be right, but so was climbing this tree.. Learning to trust your falling cuts on the ground gives one a lot more comfort when using the same cuts in the tree...

Hopefully it came out well on tape.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

Dude be careful... Dead trees have little to no hinge and and who knows what forces the root ball can take. My grandpa died in sept. from taking the top (small) out of a 27' dead hemlock, the roots were gone, and he landed in the road. 30 yr climber...

I'd tie into that other tree, or figure out another way. Trusting your cuts are one thing, but trusting a dead tree that you were gaffing out in and or gaffs to the hilt in is a bad move in my book.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

There are a lot of factors and experience that go into making a decision as to how and when to cut/trust a tree like that..

NOT trustintg the root system on dead ash is a very good idea.. Big Jon had a couple stories of root system failure on dead ash that would scare you plenty..

this cut was around 22-23".. no face or hinge... saw was hanging on my hip when it let go...

Sorry to hear about your grandfather.. that is a family tradgedy that can have an effect on many generations.. there is no getting over that.. its got to effect your perspective every time you pick up a saw... thank you for your concerns about safety, which are good to share on this forum... they may end up saving a life..
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

Daniel, did you leave you judgment in the truck?

Were you having a daredevil streak?

That sounds like a textbook, don't do this, rookie move.

You could have tied into another tree to reduce going down with the ship, but didn't. Your gaffs barely held in, most of the time.

I'm glad that you posted this first with this thread as a preface, for the less experienced.

I actually thought it was a joke at first, to be followed up with "I actually didn't want to just tie into another tree, I took the time, and got paid to, set up a highline, and got it down in a low-risk fashion."

You are worth much more to yourself, family, friends, crew, etc than you gained by cutting corners, and doing some Evil Kinevil stuff.

What went in to the decision-making process?

I'd hate to read about you in Awakenings.

Work safe, please. There are too many rookies, poorly trained, and uninformed people out there getting killed or maimed. There are too many well trained, informed people getting killed by the "freak accident" or complacency. Show the customer what Pro does, and get paid for it, or leave it. You're worth it.
 
Re: drop a 75\' tree in a 50\' LZ

[ QUOTE ]
Learning to trust your falling cuts on the ground gives one a lot more comfort when using the same cuts in the tree...


[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I guess that's my problem, not knowing my felling cuts. Well I'll just keep trying, maybe one day I'll have the awe-inspiring talent and experience to draw on that you so obviously have Daniel.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom