[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I thought this thread was the older Bradford Pear thread...
There are rules to abide by.
There are standards to abide by.
Then there are opinions...
Here is a cynical question I'll propose:
Why can't we inform the customer of the poor structure of Bradfords, and then suggest remove and replace?
If they want to replace with a Bradford, then that would be okay. After all, they could have a professional trim the tree every 2-3 years and prevent inclusions, lateral branches getting larger than 50% the size of the trunk, subordinate vigorus leaders, isolate the center leader, etc...
It would then prove that topping doesn't have to be the solution to Bradfords...
[/ QUOTE ]
Thats just crazy talk! Why would anyone want to do that? Not what the customer asked for
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't know why anyone would want to do such a thing. That is why I asked a cynical quesion and proposed a hypothetical situation....
[/ QUOTE ]
I was being sarcastic. I think if the tree cant be structurally pruned, and reduced properly, remova and replcae is one of the options available.
[/ QUOTE ]
I thought so, but sarcasim is best executed when in person and we can read non-verbal ques. It is lost via the interweb...