2015 Best Photos Thread

[Yan Manson]

Hey Jimbo, it seems you have your album locked and none of us have permission to look at it!

do you see it now?

 

[Jeff]

do you see it now?

All good now, thanks. Beautiful pics, by the way!

 

[jcarufel]

Obviously it is not Kosher, but that tree as a kid it would be so natural to just fly up it without all that clumsy rope stuff in the way.

We had a rope tied to the top so I could just clip into my chest harness and climb. It was a brutal speed climb! Amazing tree though and beautiful property!

 

[RopeShield]

Awesome stuff, Ben!

I didn't get too many pics this year. It just didn't work out that way. Here's some from Sooke, BCView attachment 35334 View attachment 35336 View attachment 35337

@Reg If you could snap a pic off the last log In flight just before hitting the beach with the saw chips trailing off. For me that would be the winner.

 

[RopeShield]

Leaner tip

 

[treevet]

shouldn't we be on "16Best Photos" now? Just sayin

 

[oceans]

shouldn't we be on "16Best Photos" now? Just sayin

If someone "wins" 2016 in JANUARY, my hat's off to them. Let's give everyone another 11 months.

 

[treevet]

was referring to postin and not nec. judgin eric lol

 

[jami5490]

11203690_10153890331332867_1514683399774170884_n

• jami5490
• Jan 24, 2016

Last job of 2015, climber at 90 feet of 105 foot white pine

last tree of 2015. climber is at 90 feet in a 105 feet tall white pine

 

[jami5490]

Good pic but no way that pine is 105'.60 at best

did the measurement knowing the length of my climbing rope, the difference on the ground and lastly the length of the top. the photo was taken by a neighbor from the second story of their house. ill post another pic

 

[jami5490]

lol 60 feet, if that were the case I would've used a boom truck and climbed any difference. here's another photo. thank you for welcoming me to your community.

 

[Steve Connally]

No offense intended. Probably my mistake

 

[BRT]

lol 60 feet, if that were the case I would've used a boom truck and climbed any difference. here's another photo. thank you for welcoming me to your community.

That must be the craziest optical illusion I've ever seen! That thing doesn't look an inch over 70'.

Can you put it back up and measure it again?

 

[jami5490]

That must be the craziest optical illusion I've ever seen! That thing doesn't look an inch over 70'.

Can you put it back up and measure it again?

Lol I know eh, its a lot like a fishing story. the second lowest stub was 25 - 30 its not the best photos in regards to height. next time ill bring out the meter stick for you guys.

 

[Gorman]

Leaner tip

Are you cabling that?

 

[squad143]

That must be the craziest optical illusion I've ever seen! That thing doesn't look an inch over 70'.

Can you put it back up and measure it again?

Must be the metric conversion

 

[Oak Savanna]

If that tree is 105' tall than the climber must be 9.5' tall.

 

[Gorman]

That pic cuts off a lot of the bottom. Just saying.

 

[Oak Savanna]

That pic cuts off a lot of the bottom. Just saying.

The other picture is a full length view. Scale the height of the climber to the height of the tree ........

 

[NorthBranch]

Rec climb pic.