[ QUOTE ]
Nathan wrote:
I find it interesting that some "arborists" think that morals or ethics = doing what is best for the tree.
May I also throw a Bull$hit flag on that play?
I always found it to be balancing what the tree needs with what the homeowner needs.
[/ QUOTE ]
Nate I like your statement about balancing what the tree needs with what the homeowner needs.
It's a shame most of the bros in that thread add a strongly expressed third variable to your equation as evidenced in their below statements:
<font color="red">"sorry mate, but thats bollocks. you'd turn down a job if you were short of work and needed to feed your family would you?"
"dignity dont pay electricity bills thats for sure"
"but at the end of the day i have to do whats on the job sheet"
you can keep your dignity, i'll have my tv, dishwasher"
"I'm ashamed to admit that I too have done what you just did."
"Here's what bothers me about all these high ideals in the tree business. Someone says,"
"I'll try to direct the customer into doing the right thing but if they want it to look like a ducky, then I'll do my damnedest to make it look like a ducky." (Old Monkey)
"I'm with Steve, Darin etc. I have 3 kids and a mortgage and for Ekka to compare that with shooting comeone becasue your told to is a bit harsh. "
"if i walked away from topping jobs on a moral basis i too might have time to waste shooting video instead of actually working and earning a living"
"f they still insist in having the guts ripped out of the tree ie topped I WILL DO IT,I COULDN'T CARELESS I DON'T HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE TREES..
I have a business to run an emplyee to pay ,kit to pay for,a subby to pay etc etc,IM NOT GOING TO DECLINE WORK and fill the opositions pockets."
"Busines is business where ever you are john." (Roller)
"What home owners do to there trees is really no concern of mine" (Roller)
"I have a house morgage of over one hundred thousand pounds and two kids!
I cannot afford to take a moral high ground if I did I would be a fool." (High Scale) </font>
==============================================
John Stewart had a great reponse to Steve Bullman in that thread.
<font color="blue">
SteveBullman wrote:
sorry mate, but thats bollocks.
you'd turn down a job if you were short of work and needed to feed your family would you?
John Stewart replied:
Actually that is Bollocks cause there is plenty of work!
And if you got to work from one job to the next to eat you better get another job cause your doing this all wrong
My two cents
Later
</font>