Trees from a distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter TC
  • Start date Start date
Yeah sorry BB. It went to the first one to view it at that point. Here you go BB I feel bad.
 

Attachments

  • 137403-8866667.webp
    137403-8866667.webp
    101.6 KB · Views: 138
I hope the attachment works.

Anyhow... give this one a shot. I'll give two clues. First, it is not a beech. Second, this is a very large specimen for this species.
 

Attachments

  • 137520-P3090242.webp
    137520-P3090242.webp
    1,002.6 KB · Views: 176
Very beautiful tree. Looks like it was coppiced years ago or cut down and multi-trunks grew from its stump.
Is it possibly a Salix ? There is a Crack Willow that is considered the largest of its species.

-Diane-
 
Hawthorn,...Oh, yeah. That's what ALL those points (thorns!) are on the stems!
ooo.gif

My computer doesn't zoom in all that well on photos.

-Diane-
 
When I first glanced at it I thought it looked like a Acer saccharinum but closer look and it doesn't look opp.. Plus they get fairly large. I have a lot of trees it could be in mind mainly shrubs to small trees from your clue. I don't know - don't laugh.. Hamamelis virginiana?

From your other clue saying its not a beech( even though it doesnt resemble a beech). Could it be.... Amelanchier arborea
 
No. Perhaps I sent you all down the wrong path in the size department, but a witchhazel this would be! This just happens to be a very large, broad speading specimen. The largest I have seen personally. If you look closely, very closely there is a unique characteristic of this tree you may notice. I guess that strays from the "trees at a distance" theme, but keep guessing.
 
EZ, that is what i thought also - as there is a hint of color in that upper right corner.


the unusual feature is that the flowers bloom on the branch not at the leaf. (i forget what they call that) (if i ever knew- i did- once).

the eastern red buds can get up to 30 foot in height.

Cercis canadensis

jz
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom