Tree Species Failure Profiles

Redtree said:
infected ash may be weaker than ash that isn't but don't you agree that Sugar Maple (hard Maple) is stronger than Ash?

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Define "stronger".

See the chart on page 79-80 on the link I provided on page 1 of this thread...

White ash has slightly stronger modulus of rupture while green, but sugar maple stronger at 12%. White ash breaks at a higher static bending load both green and dry.

Impact bending strength (hitting a hard object moving at 100 MPH): Maple is stronger green, ash is stronger dry. Looks like maple is stronger in other dynamic loads.

A baseball bat isn't about strength (as long as it is 'strong enough')...it is about how the ball plays off of the bat.

A shovel handle is about that static bending load.

If you want "stronger" look to hickory. But it is heavier too - that is why it is not used for bats or shovel handles. The extra weight is "worth it" for striking tools.
 
first time I've made a web reference. anyway you are right ATH. it's largely about the way the ball comes off. it also says (not that it's true because it says) that maple breaks less often but more violently. this suggests maple is stronger. it also points out that maple is more durable. I think on a scale you would have Ash, which is lighter then Hard Maple which is heavier then Hickory which is heaviest. Maple is the preferred rake handle. ash for shovels because it is light. I know this is a derail but I have severe ADHD so sorry. it's not a 'problem' just a bit annoying for people who like to stay on track and aren't interested in dry wood strength as much as species tendencies. at least it's slightly related. by the way great reference at your earlier post #9 ATH.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom