helmet cam

glens.. I agree with that. Those #s seem accurate to what I have. The vids I post at youtube are sometimes a little blurry, yet when I save to cd or view on my own laptop it is clear.so they must do something that makes it blurry.
 
Here's what I was told when I emailed this company:

Mark,
I would recommend our 520 Res Sony Camera. If you have a camcorder that accepts A/V inputs, it's a simple plug and play.

You can view our camcorder compatibility list here:

http://stuntcams.com/shop/product_info.php/cPath/25/products_id/45

If a person doesn't have a camcorder, I'd recommend our MP4 DVR product to record the footage.

The quality between our MP4 recorder and your camcorder are going to be real close in quality, it just depends on if you'd like the video in digital format, or if you'd like it on your camcorder, tape, hard drive, etc.

The wireless setup would also work, most people use it w/ their camcorder and just keep the camcorder down on the ground in a backpack.

We also carry a camera (ATC-2000) that records to an SD card, not as good of quality and only 2 HRs of record time, but it's very easy to setup and mount with no wires.

If you have any other questions, let me know. If you'd like you can post this to your board as well to help answer any questions and we also have a FAQ on our website.

Thanks,

--
Mike Gramza
sales@stuntcams.com
www.stuntcams.com
616.980.0093
 
Angus, that's a great video!
I have used the GRCS on the ground in place of the gas capstan and it works really well as it frees up the climbers hands to cut on the way up and you can easily bail out if need be.
I use a seperate safety and drop off the seat at the top and have it lowered to the ground then use the same block for lowering.
 
Yeah, now that was cool, man can you give us the link or details on where to get one of those motorized "beam me up Scotty" ascenders?

Here's the direct URL for the video. I found if you open your player and insert the entire address in the "open url" field it fires up and buffers no problemo.

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>http://sherbrooketrees.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/helmet_cam_sherbrooketrees.wmv</pre><hr />
 
The winch you refered to in the link is significantly different to scotty, however similar in application.
The 'portable' winch in the link is for what appears to be a very wide range of heavy winching, varying from log snigs through to boat pulling.
Scotty uses a tanaka power head to drive the actual winch (pretty much the same size as a wipper snipper)
All up it weighs around 6-7kg. The most important distinction is that scotty is *purely* an access winch, rated for 250kg (rescue situation, 2 humans + gear).
As you might have noticed in the small amount of video Graeme puts on the net, the winch is controlled by him.

I mentioned this because due to the height seperation between climber and groundies, speech and visual communication is heavily impaired, so it is not practical to be instructing ground crew from there, let alone adjust his position. Even when using the static climbing lines, with over 350-400' of line out, tiny adjustments on the ground don't often match the change to the climber. This can pose serious problems if you are already approaching your highpoint.

From what my experience has been with the winch, to justify the cost, and sometimes setup time, it really needs to make the job more efficient. I'm not very familar in dealing with the big D.Fir's or Cali Redwoods since we dont get many in Australia, however I have noticed (proportional to the trunk diameter) that there are a LOT of small limbs, which start from the very bottom, and go right to the top. To set an initial access line and then manage to get clean access past all those limbs seems unrealisitic, let alone efficient. I imagine it'd be more cost effective to just climb and naw off as you go. (just my opinion...)
In contrast, for a similarly high Euc in our area, we might have 100' feet to the first limb, but that limb is the same size as a 90ft tree. If we have six 250' trees in a day to climb, the practicality of Graeme climbing 1500' and working effectively all day is silly and unnecessary.

In a very round-about way, I am suggesting that if you are looking at buying a winch, consider the types of trees you intend to use it on, and whether the outlay will have good dividends in terms of efficiency for job and business. blah blah blah...........
 
Yes the portable winch would be better suited to advance a climber from a ground anchored position but control isn't as smooth as the GRCS.
It's powerful enough to launch you up the tree in an lazyboy though.
cool.gif
 
Nice Vid. What kind of Cam is it?

Oh not to harp on safety but.....You were driving on the wrong side of the road!
driving.gif
happydance.gif
 
Yeah, bit freaky for you guys, when guys visited they keep getting in the drivers seat when I was driving! and they had this funny thing about right hand turns here.

The camera is around 3 to 4 years old now. A Sony DCR-TRV15E.

But is good quality one using mini DV tape.

The helmetcam is a 580 resolution/lines.

Now the reasoning for this is that the camera in 4:3 mode shoots 720x576 so a 580 is the closest match to the verticle pixels... no quality loss. Now that's because we are PAL not NTSC. Although the camera can be put into NTSC mode why would I when it is poorer quality at 720x480. Hence that's why Yanks wont notice a difference buying a 480 resolution helmet cam ... buy a 580 and the camcorder crunches it down to 480 anyway, no gain!

Here's a link to a very informative site on it ... and PAL is way out front, so if ya camera can flick to PAL do so. Then render your wmv and whacko ... 20% more pixels.
smile.gif


http://www.michaeldvd.com.au/Articles/PALvsNTSC/PALvsNTSC.asp
 
The whole shabang fits in a small camel pack. There's an adhesive tape with velcro ... the camera has a holder with velcro underneath and wella. But the curve on the helmet means only a small portion of velcro is in contact so I just put some tape over it too.

Thing is, you keep wondering what it looks like and if it's OK, could be a dirty great blowfly sitting there or something???!!!
frown.gif


It's also got a screw in rear mount but I aint drilling holes in the helmet ... the camera cant fall as it's got wires attached to it, and it only wieghs ounces (negligble weight). All the crap in ya camel pack is the worry, dont drop that!

Camel packs are good coz they got little nooks and places to feed the wires through. I got a little LED on/off switch ... when it's recording it's red, standby is green, flashing red/green means 5 mins tape left, flashing red is out of tape.

Bugger was I had really good jobs for it last week, this week I got a little crane and bucket truck job, just a poinciana but it's got huge log and the usual no high point and bad spread. It'll be something I suppose.

Atleast you have ya hands free and taking footage at the same time.
smile.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]


attached a pic of the camera on a helmet...it doesnt look too bad....and on another note, i REALLY like the look of that helmet, can anyone ID it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Steve, this is not the same helmet but very similar. its Vaude. A stockist near me has one in red which is a dark, burgundy red. Its very very light, too small for my fat head but might suit you nicely. They do mail order if your interested.

36102-0010.jpg
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom