[ QUOTE ]
Why is using gaffs that are longer than needed a problem? Is it a balance issue? A safety issue? Just a personal preference? What??????
- BarnHouse
[/ QUOTE ]
For me:
Pole gaffs are much easier on the lower legs.
On hard, or thin bark trees, the foot is really far away from the tree when using tree gaffs and it feels like my shins are bowed by the time I'm done an all day job.
I do keep a set of pole gaff ones and tree gaff ones.
Big deal, they don't cost much. Well, not for something that's really not ever going to wear out.
Yes you can change out the spikes, but I'd rather not spend that little bit of time.
I put the tree gaffs on when it's a really thick bark tree, but again, when I'm at the top, I wish I had the pole gaffs on.
Ivy trees also, are a must for the tree gaffs. Also really rotten trees where the last 2 inches of sap wood is extremely soft.
For the trees around here, on removals, I use the pole gaffs probably 95% of the time, tree gaffs the 5%.
I'm glad when I have the tree gaffs for those 5% that really need them.
I especially don't like the tree gaffs on a tight bark tree and I'm climbing on a 4 inch diameter bean-pole top.
Because I almost always have the pole gaffs on, that when i do wear the tree gaffs, I have to be concious that I don't put one through the other foot when walking on the ground and that I don't dull them on rocky ground.