#enough


You name call & others threaten.

You name call

Others threaten

Is that better?

Those that are making he most noise weren’t even near the shooter.

Why are only the students who align with the narrative the focus?
 
rico said:
Hell yea they want more than a ban on bump stocks, but I don't recall them demanding everyones guns. Thats just the 2nd amenders showing themselves to be unwilling to any new gun control or compromise. Nobody is coming take away all our guns. Utter bullshit that will never happen in America. Universal background checks, and a ban on assault weapons.. Sounds fair to me.
Click to expand...

You are correct about 1 thing: the lack of willingness to give up Constitutional Rights.

We know that Confiscation is the end goal: sugarcoat it, call it something else, say it’s for the kids. We see thru the BS.
 
Bucknut said:
Well too bad bro. Doesn't matter what you support. The kids own the future and they won't be stopped. Remember? Out with the old? In with the new? Change is coming and it is inevitable. Any of that familiar?

And don't mistake it: these kids do want your guns:
View attachment 50359
The speaker was Delaney Tarr. I'm not even opposed to a bump stock ban. But they want more. Always more.
Click to expand...

Bump Stocks are a non-issue that has been turn into an issue.

Any self respecting Gun owner with real knowledge knows they are a Novelty.
 
Levi.CO said:
Good, I say!


Word, one shot then reload. Everyone with a modern weapon should just trade in for the ones we had when 2a came about. If the 2nd ammenders really want to honor the document, no worries.
Click to expand...

Good, because when it was written, ordinary citizens had what their opponents had. Glad we Agree on something.

Now Let’s abolish the NFA!!
 
hseII said:
You are correct about 1 thing: the lack of willingness to give up Constitutional Rights.

We know that Confiscation is the end goal: sugarcoat it, call it something else, say it’s for the kids. We see thru the BS.
Click to expand...
There it is. The paranoia, and an utter unwillingness for any compromise. Guns over life. Cling to those weapons at all cost, cause the boogie-man is coming to take all your guns. How the fuck you gonna argue with that?
 
77,000 Japanese troops chose suicide on Okinawa. It cost 17,000 U.S. Troop's lives mopping that shit up.
I definitely see that insofar as indoctrination into absolutes. Bannon and the like, doing it for the corrupt wealthy. The same lines, argumentive style, retweets and Hillary shit. A narrow but viscious media, feeding only itself, and the core digging those tunnels. For their emperor. Death before dishonor. Cold finger shit.
Yeah, right.
 
images
 
Levi.CO said:
Back at ya Buck. I've a feeling most heads here are solid people in the real worlds. Although, some are clearly shady and not to be trusted, like that @JD3000 dude, DO NOT rsvp his bbq invites!
Click to expand...
Jeeeeez...someone is still mad that we serve actual meat at out gatherings. Either that or you're still upset cuz you thought the raffle was rigged. Not my fault @JeffGu won the Cloak of Eternal Dankness.

The slaughtering of the Wood Nymphs that followed was a tragedy I'll admit but I think we all learned a lot about ourselves and each other that night.

Namely that Levi shouldn't try to light his farts.
 
Last edited:
Bucknut said:
Respectfully Tom, I think it's vastly, galactically more bizarre. Besides, the school is arming teachers - but with a hopelessly, absurdly ineffective "weapon", instead of one that might actually deter shooters and/or save lives.

Police carry guns, not rocks, for a reason. If my kids were faced with a shooter, I damn sure want someone in that school to have a gun to defend them. Not a bucket of rocks.

Does anyone here defend their home or family with rocks? If not, why not? Please discuss.
Click to expand...

I don't think that police carrying guns is a universal thing. Many of them carry lesser weapons. It's just domestically that they carry guns, and in many other countries as well. The same argument can be applied to say that police should be armed with armoured personnel carriers, attack drones, etc. Really, if one part of society escalates then the other parts escalate, and vice versa if they de-escalate. My sheriff department for our county with small municipalities has an armoured skid steer and an armoured personnel carrier (which actually pulled over an ordinary citizen last year, facepalm...).

The local university police shot a mentally unwell student in the face with assault rifles when they saw his cane - they knew he had a cane and they knew he was unwell. Oh, and my son was 50ft. away sleeping when it happened, so that was great to have all those assault rifle wall-punching bullets flying around. The university graduated the graduate student a couple years later (no conflict of interest there...), with half a face.

My mom was a quarter mile away from the San Bernardino shooting.

One of my friends graduated from parkland.

Last year I was working and a target practice bullet from three lots over came whizzing by 30 ft. away from me. Probably a responsible gun owner, but accidents happen, huh?

The bullets are getting closer to me and mine, and I'm not cool with it. They are coming from the guns of terrorists, police, irresponsible gun owners, and "responsible" gun owners. The quotes on the word responsible indicate that we don't know sh*t about what's in the head of anyone else - we really don't. I'm not judging anyone, I'm just judging everyone realistically.

If responsible people with guns want to keep them, I'll support that as long as they don't just hunker in their bunkers. They need to get out and say what their legitimate solutions are. I really will support retention of 2nd amendment rights. I value that. I just don't want to wait for another person to die in the same old way, and I don't want to wait for my family or myself to receive a bullet directly for your 2nd amendment rights.

Do you get where I, personally, am coming from?
 
colb said:
I don't think that police carrying guns is a universal thing. Many of them carry lesser weapons. It's just domestically that they carry guns, and in many other countries as well. The same argument can be applied to say that police should be armed with armoured personnel carriers, attack drones, etc. Really, if one part of society escalates then the other parts escalate, and vice versa if they de-escalate. My sheriff department for our county with small municipalities has an armoured skid steer and an armoured personnel carrier (which actually pulled over an ordinary citizen last year, facepalm...).

The local university police shot a mentally unwell student in the face with assault rifles when they saw his cane - they knew he had a cane and they knew he was unwell. Oh, and my son was 50ft. away sleeping when it happened, so that was great to have all those assault rifle wall-punching bullets flying around. The university graduated the graduate student a couple years later (no conflict of interest there...), with half a face.

My mom was a quarter mile away from the San Bernardino shooting.

One of my friends graduated from parkland.

Last year I was working and a target practice bullet from three lots over came whizzing by 30 ft. away from me. Probably a responsible gun owner, but accidents happen, huh?

The bullets are getting closer to me and mine, and I'm not cool with it. They are coming from the guns of terrorists, police, irresponsible gun owners, and "responsible" gun owners. The quotes on the word responsible indicate that we don't know sh*t about what's in the head of anyone else - we really don't. I'm not judging anyone, I'm just judging everyone realistically.

If responsible people with guns want to keep them, I'll support that as long as they don't just hunker in their bunkers. They need to get out and say what their legitimate solutions are. I really will support retention of 2nd amendment rights. I value that. I just don't want to wait for another person to die in the same old way, and I don't want to wait for my family or myself to receive a bullet directly for your 2nd amendment rights.

Do you get where I, personally, am coming from?
Click to expand...
Great post Colb!
 
Simpleiowaguy said:
I think every one needs to chill out and act like men. People have different views and opinions. What’s lacking in anyone gaining any ground is resorting to attacking each other instead of focusing on issue at hand. Schools need tighter security. Our schools in my town.... small town Iowa! We have all doors get locked down except the main one during school hours and you have to go through the main office to get into the building during school hours. They are also implementing a school resource officer starting next year. He is a former veteran that I went to school with and I have no doubt that he would lay his life down for the kids. I don’t believe that banning any type of weapon or any capacitty of magazine will stop attacks. Evil will always find a way to be evil. There are no regulations that will prevent it from happening. Murder is illegal everywhere and people still do it. Protect your loved ones at whatever cost.
Click to expand...

I Agree.
 
Levi.CO said:
Unless you can prove that you need a firearm to kill game to feed yourself... wait a minute... you can do that with a bow and arrow... yeah, we don't need guns. Chuck em in the smelter!
Click to expand...

I nor anyone else has to “Prove” anything.
Exhibit 2A
04ea81befa051984e0b3b5f4bbc9d56b.jpg


Yep, that “Shall Not be Infringed” covers it.
 
He flops around as bad as trump the deadly clown. He agrees to order and calm. Then he posts what I just saw at NRA. In the context of both last word, and reminder that he's tunnel fodder.

Just, why?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom