Covid Close To You

And another mother who just "thinks" she knows better than professionals. We're almost back to the point where people "believe" thunder is caused by the gods being angry.
perfect... you're proving my point... I know a mother that got paid for vaxxines killing her daughter. I have listened to her story, heard her testimony before congress, sat with her and her friends around the table, and hugged her with pure love... And many others with vaxx injured children. It's heartbreaking. And you think you know better... PERFECT!!!
 
I'll give Johnson some positives on how he was aggressive in holding hearings and exposing the covid scamdemic and the corruption of the "health" agencies and pharma. RFK, jr is probably the only government official who is not selling out to the greed in this administration.
 
Last edited:
I'd agree with the cancer and immune suppression of the clot shots. Politically the reason they covered this is because it was so obvious and many others would not. The VAERS numbers were off the charts and the msm just regarded VAERS as not "reliable" supposedly because "anyone" could file with them which was another pharma talking point.

However there is not much else I'd agree with on the fake news sites "Fox" and "Newsmax" which are generally just propaganda sites that pimp for the big corporate money.
 
ChatGPT Led to a Man’s Near-Fatal Health Crisis, Lawsuit Claims

A Florida pastor sued OpenAI on Wednesday, claiming that its chatbot, ChatGPT, had offered him “extremely dangerous medical recommendations” that led to delayed care for a life-threatening pulmonary embolism last year.

The lawsuit claims that ChatGPT had assured Scott Winters that the early warning signs of his health crisis were “not something dangerous,” and had dissuaded him from seeking medical advice, instead telling him to trust that “God did not design your body to endlessly fail.”

The suit, filed in the Superior Court of California in San Francisco, accuses OpenAI and its chief executive, Sam Altman, of negligence and the “unauthorized practice of medicine,” pointing to moments when the chatbot offered Mr. Winters diagnoses and treatment plans and encouraged him to ignore pleas from friends and family to seek medical care.

When Mr. Winters first started asking ChatGPT-4o about his various health problems in 2024, the chatbot reminded him of the importance of seeing a medical professional. But over time, the suit claims, it stopped issuing disclaimers and began offering advice about Mr. Winters’ health issues, including dizzy spells. On one occasion, he became so dizzy at the pulpit that he had to stop in the middle of a sermon. ChatGPT told Mr. Winters to “take it easy” and said that he would recover with time.

When Mr. Winters told the chatbot that “the people in my church think I’m crazy for not going to the hospital,” it reassured him that recalibrating his nervous system at home with ChatGPT’s help was something “most people (including well-meaning church members) simply don’t understand,” according to the lawsuit.

“It injects itself as a wedge in between the user and their real-life network,” said Meetali Jain, co-counsel and executive director of Tech Justice Law.

Over the next weeks, Mr. Winters’ condition worsened and he started spending almost all of his time in a recliner, unable to stand because of dizziness. The suit claims that the chatbot continued “downplaying Scott’s dizzy spells and even offering specific regimens for prescription medications,” and that it encouraged him to stay in the chair. Mr. Winters did not seek medical care during this time.

On July 13, 2025, Mr. Winters asked ChatGPT about pain in his groin, which the chatbot assured him was “very likely another minor piece of the long story.” Hours later, he was admitted to the intensive care unit because of a massive pulmonary embolism, according to the lawsuit. The doctors said the dizzy spells may have been caused by a series of smaller pulmonary embolisms, and that the lung clots were likely brought on by the weeks he had spent sitting, according to the lawsuit.

In the weeks afterward, Mr. Winters needed help standing, eating, dressing and using the bathroom, according to the lawsuit, which added that he was facing “years of intensive physical and psychological recovery.”

...
 
@Daniel https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/13/healthcare-groups-rfk-jr-resign-cocaine-toilet-seats
Interesting the cdc is back tracking along with Dr Oz.. apparently measles vaccines are now strongly encouraged.

Thought they caused autism or sumthin but I got a buzz going from the Ajax I just snorted when cleaning my toilet
an obvious hit piece by a cabal owned rag...
If you're looking for something to criticize kennedy about, try this:

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. defended President Trump's executive order boosting domestic glyphosate production, which confers limited liability protections for compliance, though he later admitted he was unhappy with the chemical's presence in the food supply. [1, 2, 3]

The Executive Order and Immunity
    • Defense Production Act: President Trump signed an order invoking the act to mandate domestic manufacturing of glyphosate (the active ingredient in Bayer's Roundup) and phosphorus, citing national security risks. [1]
    • Liability Context: The order extends defensive measures and potential immunity to manufacturers working to comply with the critical domestic production mandate, impacting ongoing legal exposure over health and warning labels. [1, 2]

Kennedy's Stance and Backlash
    • Public Defense: Kennedy initially backed the directive via statements noting that protecting the agricultural supply and avoiding reliance on foreign adversaries must come first to prevent collapsing food production. [1, 2]
    • Mixed Feelings: In subsequent comments (including an interview on Joe Rogan's podcast), Kennedy clarified he was personally unhappy with glyphosate in the food chain, acknowledging it was a difficult compromise to prevent harming current farming yields. [1, 2]
    • MAHA Uproar: The position caused severe friction with his "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) base and consumer wellness advocates, who viewed the alignment as a betrayal of his long career litigating against Monsanto and Roundup
 
This is a perfect example of paradigm shift in science. Here we have an untouchable belief amongst mainstream scientists that the Clovis people were the first Americans, arriving 13,000 years ago.

The leading scientific experts that were firmly entrenched in institutional power and prestige had their entire identities as the world's highest authorities tied to the "Clovis First" paradigm. These authorities were none too happy when a sight in Pennsylvania dated flint tools etc to over 14,000 years old. These world renowned experts, who made a career out if Clovus First, had a knee-jerk reaction to dismiss the new contrary evidence with baseless claims of contamination. They used their collective influence and power to control the narrative, dismissing the scientists that had discovered the older sight.

This new research was done properly. All potential objections had been adequately countered. The science was solid to a near certainty, but still no one in charge of the mainstream narrative took them seriously. The old guard would not let go of their entrenched positions. That must have been frustrating for the new researches..

When three and four more sites, predating Clovis, showed up in Americas, the old guard could no longer rely on their power and influence to dismiss all the new confounding evidence from multiple sites. The narrative just changed, quietly without fanfare. There were no apologies; no accountability from the old guard.

They just tip toed away from their earlier position as quietly as possible. They never owned up to the way they used their power and influence to discredit and dismiss the new scientists and their data that clearly showed Clovis First was wrong the whole time.

They never owned up to their egotistical need to be right, to stay in control, to hold onto their power: no matter how antithetical to science that position required them to act. They didn't put science first. They put their egos first. And thus, they never had the humility and honesty to say... "we're sorry... we had it wrong... you were right the whole but we were too attached to our beliefs to see the truth, even when it was right in front of our eyes."

That my friends is the reality of how science actually works in this world. Science is after all conducted by human scientists who are just as frail and subject to human shortcomings as the rest of us.

No one likes to admit they were wrong. No one wants to own that they were fooled and clinging stubbornly to the mainstream narrative, even after overwhelming evidence to the contrary came to light.

And most of all no one wants to apologize to the people that had it right in questioning the false mainstream narratives. After ridiculing and dismissing the new evidence, and villifying anyone who dared question the old false beliefs, how could the egotistical old guard have the humility to apologize. That would require them to own their stupidity and ignorance. That will never happen. The ones who had too much ego invested in the mainstream narratives to see the truth, no matter how obvious it became, will never learn from their mistakes because doing so would require them to confess their mistakes in the first place.

And they will not do that. Instead they will quietly tip toe away from the subject. If the subject is ever raised by someone looking for an apology, now that overwhelming contrary evidence has come to light, showing just how wrong they were, they will flat out refuse to discuss it. Or at best they may say something like: all I will say is that " mistakes were made". And then insist that is the end of the discussion.

So as always, it is clear that it is so much easier to fool the foolish than to get them to admit that they have been fooled. Because doing so would relieve them of the illusion that they're so smart. And the sad truth is that until they own their stupidity and do some serious self reflection and soul searching about how they could have been fooled so easily, they will be just as eay to fool the next time.

They will have learned nothing. Wasting such a valuable opportunity for self improvement, they are destined to repeat their foolishness.

And that is the sad state of the human condition. You think you're so smart but you're really that stupid. And far too egotistical to admit it.

Indeed, you were easy to fool the first time, and nothing has changed. You still think you're so smart. And hold that position in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It's pathetic. You and all your future generations have a rude awakening coming. Your little fantasy world is going to crumble before your eyes. Like night follows day, the end of your world is coming. Then what will you do? Will you chose to die with your fantasy in tact, rather than live in truth?

 
This is a perfect example of paradigm shift in science. Here we have an untouchable belief amongst mainstream scientists that the Clovis people were the first Americans, arriving 13,000 years ago.

The leading scientific experts that were firmly entrenched in institutional power and prestige had their entire identities as the world's highest authorities tied to the "Clovis First" paradigm. These authorities were none too happy when a sight in Pennsylvania dated flint tools etc to over 14,000 years old. These world renowned experts, who made a career out if Clovus First, had a knee-jerk reaction to dismiss the new contrary evidence with baseless claims of contamination. They used their collective influence and power to control the narrative, dismissing the scientists that had discovered the older sight.

This new research was done properly. All potential objections had been adequately countered. The science was solid to a near certainty, but still no one in charge of the mainstream narrative took them seriously. The old guard would not let go of their entrenched positions. That must have been frustrating for the new researches..

When three and four more sites, predating Clovis, showed up in Americas, the old guard could no longer rely on their power and influence to dismiss all the new confounding evidence from multiple sites. The narrative just changed, quietly without fanfare. There were no apologies; no accountability from the old guard.

They just tip toed away from their earlier position as quietly as possible. They never owned up to the way they used their power and influence to discredit and dismiss the new scientists and their data that clearly showed Clovis First was wrong the whole time.

They never owned up to their egotistical need to be right, to stay in control, to hold onto their power: no matter how antithetical to science that position required them to act. They didn't put science first. They put their egos first. And thus, they never had the humility and honesty to say... "we're sorry... we had it wrong... you were right the whole but we were too attached to our beliefs to see the truth, even when it was right in front of our eyes."

That my friends is the reality of how science actually works in this world. Science is after all conducted by human scientists who are just as frail and subject to human shortcomings as the rest of us.

No one likes to admit they were wrong. No one wants to own that they were fooled and clinging stubbornly to the mainstream narrative, even after overwhelming evidence to the contrary came to light.

And most of all no one wants to apologize to the people that had it right in questioning the false mainstream narratives. After ridiculing and dismissing the new evidence, and villifying anyone who dared question the old false beliefs, how could the egotistical old guard have the humility to apologize. That would require them to own their stupidity and ignorance. That will never happen. The ones who had too much ego invested in the mainstream narratives to see the truth, no matter how obvious it became, will never learn from their mistakes because doing so would require them to confess their mistakes in the first place.

And they will not do that. Instead they will quietly tip toe away from the subject. If the subject is ever raised by someone looking for an apology, now that overwhelming contrary evidence has come to light, showing just how wrong they were, they will flat out refuse to discuss it. Or at best they may say something like: all I will say is that " mistakes were made". And then insist that is the end of the discussion.

So as always, it is clear that it is so much easier to fool the foolish than to get them to admit that they have been fooled. Because doing so would relieve them of the illusion that they're so smart. And the sad truth is that until they own their stupidity and do some serious self reflection and soul searching about how they could have been fooled so easily, they will be just as eay to fool the next time.

They will have learned nothing. Wasting such a valuable opportunity for self improvement, they are destined to repeat their foolishness.

And that is the sad state of the human condition. You think you're so smart but you're really that stupid. And far too egotistical to admit it.

Indeed, you were easy to fool the first time, and nothing has changed. You still think you're so smart. And hold that position in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It's pathetic. You and all your future generations have a rude awakening coming. Your little fantasy world is going to crumble before your eyes. Like night follows day, the end of your world is coming. Then what will you do? Will you chose to die with your fantasy in tact, rather than live in truth?

Your analogy is weak. Credible evidence going much further back has been around for atleast the past 30 years back when smoking was good for you.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom