- Location
- Kansas City
Re: hold on to your shorts!!!!!!!!!!!!
to your point boston he is also giving money to Mexico for abortions.
He is very european. In france it is illegal to work longer than 35 hours, I dont know about you but my experience tells me in the tree industry that would limit my income.
The reality is the mess is both sides fault.
1. Clinton- signing the bill that forced all government backed banks to make bad loans to anyone and everyone.
2. Bush deregulation- did not allow for the oversight of the financial, and other markets, and when the repubs brought the issue up no one listend including bush
3. the Paulson 750Billion dollar bailout that both the dems who controled the house helped pass as well as the repubs. the old saying goes "Fast legislation is BAD legislation".
4. You cannot spend your way out of a deficit you only get deeper
5. Obamas 800b-1.3 trillion spending bill another make government larger slush fund to make our law makers slobbering to give there constituants a little piece of the pie.
So what do we do????
If we use a system that works such as first Obama is the CEO, legislators are the board of directors and we the people are the share holders.
As a CEO his Job is to protect the corporation and increase shareholder value.
Right now the ONLY way Obama can do this is CUT Just like a normal corporation would do, EVERY program not having to do with the essential operation and protection of the country, with the exeption of a few like taking care of the elderly, and education, other than that everything, like the National educators association, Planned parent hood, all the "green initiatives", the bridges to no where, studing the mating habits of polar bears, national endowment for the arts. In this plan many even tens of thousands of people would lose there jobs.
The flips side would be the government would shrink and lower operational costs by 100's of billions of dollars there by reducing significantly the tax burden on everyone and allowing corporations to flourish hire more people. philanthropy would be on the rise by alot, there would be billions more money flooding into the market to capital invest (which is what built this country), and in the end way more jobs would be created than lost. Once there is a surplus only that surplus would be allocated to not for profit groups such as the named above.
The Board ( legislators)need to create an enviroment for businesses in the united states to flourish, by regulating free enterprise for the protection of both the shareholder and the corporation, not infringing on either.
The shareholder needs to have the power to hold the elected board accountable and require honesty, integrity, and enforce the principles for which our country was founded on.
to your point boston he is also giving money to Mexico for abortions.
He is very european. In france it is illegal to work longer than 35 hours, I dont know about you but my experience tells me in the tree industry that would limit my income.
The reality is the mess is both sides fault.
1. Clinton- signing the bill that forced all government backed banks to make bad loans to anyone and everyone.
2. Bush deregulation- did not allow for the oversight of the financial, and other markets, and when the repubs brought the issue up no one listend including bush
3. the Paulson 750Billion dollar bailout that both the dems who controled the house helped pass as well as the repubs. the old saying goes "Fast legislation is BAD legislation".
4. You cannot spend your way out of a deficit you only get deeper
5. Obamas 800b-1.3 trillion spending bill another make government larger slush fund to make our law makers slobbering to give there constituants a little piece of the pie.
So what do we do????
If we use a system that works such as first Obama is the CEO, legislators are the board of directors and we the people are the share holders.
As a CEO his Job is to protect the corporation and increase shareholder value.
Right now the ONLY way Obama can do this is CUT Just like a normal corporation would do, EVERY program not having to do with the essential operation and protection of the country, with the exeption of a few like taking care of the elderly, and education, other than that everything, like the National educators association, Planned parent hood, all the "green initiatives", the bridges to no where, studing the mating habits of polar bears, national endowment for the arts. In this plan many even tens of thousands of people would lose there jobs.
The flips side would be the government would shrink and lower operational costs by 100's of billions of dollars there by reducing significantly the tax burden on everyone and allowing corporations to flourish hire more people. philanthropy would be on the rise by alot, there would be billions more money flooding into the market to capital invest (which is what built this country), and in the end way more jobs would be created than lost. Once there is a surplus only that surplus would be allocated to not for profit groups such as the named above.
The Board ( legislators)need to create an enviroment for businesses in the united states to flourish, by regulating free enterprise for the protection of both the shareholder and the corporation, not infringing on either.
The shareholder needs to have the power to hold the elected board accountable and require honesty, integrity, and enforce the principles for which our country was founded on.
