I got some crazy ideas the past few days, trying to figure out that this whole rope slippage/performance issue, and I'd like to share them now.
First idea I got: Has anyone thought about somehow integrating a rope wrench into the device? I thought about a few possible scenarios (didn't actually tinker, however, so I do not know about actual hardware compatibility and such): Replacing the top arm completely with the wrench. Like a frankenstein CBDB. I don't know how well this would work, considering the top arm is component the user depresses in order to descend on the device. Second possible idea: Add the rope wrench ABOVE the top arm, connecting it via some kind of small, stiff teather to the spot where the black spacer is, the spot just before the bollard, and after the top attachment point of the spine. In addition, in this configuration, I think the bollard would have to be either swapped to the smallest size OR removed completely. Three points of contact/friction. Basically makes the BDB into a metal friction hitch in a Wrench system. Just a thought. Not sure how practical this is: Would most likely make the device another 2-4" longer, which is not so "compact".
Second idea: Integrating a friction hitch into the device, a la Chris Coates's experimentation with the Rope Runner ("Hitch Runner"), where the bird is replaced with a short e2e. Maybe the eyes of the hitch cord could be installed on the same spot I suggested before with the Wrench tether - the black spacer just before the bollard.
I realize all of this might be a sin against humanity, messing around with a perfectly designed device with superior performance like the BDB. Maybe I should just keep my grubby little hands and stupid ideas off Gordon's work of art, before I destroy something beautiful! These seem like pipe dreams now that I write them all down, but I felt the impulse to share, just because.
Get back to me on whatcha think!