[ QUOTE ]
MB,
Are you speaking of handsaw vs. chainsaw for pruning or removals?
***
I havn't done any timed sessions but I have a sense that for pruning a handsaw is quicker. When you factor in clipping and unclipping a lanyard and putting in hearing protection there is time saved. Also, one-handed handsaw use isn't a factor yet.
There are still plenty of people who've gotten cut using handsaws so the safety issue is equal. Same with polesaws. I've got a cracked collar bone from a pole saw bopping me 25 years ago.
[/ QUOTE ]
I always carry a hand saw on removals, but don't use it much. When pruning, the accuracy makes it much more attractive to handsaw along with the other points we've already made. And, yes, it can be faster if you are making lots of isolated cuts, but if you can reach 6 branches from one spot, the chainsaw is probably faster (depending on how big they are and what you have to do to drop the branch safely).
I admit you can get hurt by hand tools (as you know, my worst cut was from a falling pole) but I still think the risk is higher with a chainsaw. You don't have to hit a rope hard to cut it with a chain (yes, I know hand saws can cut rope too, but I've never seen one cut all the way through this way). Not counting the big one, all my hand saw cuts have been minor nicks and scratches. The time a slowing chain caught my shin, it went through jeans, socks and skin in no time, and though it wasn't deep it was wide and messy. You might be just as likely to get injured with hand tools, but I think the potential for damage is much higher with a chain.
k