Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My instructions to him were to let it swing out over the yard before letting it run. He let it fly right away and the tips caught. :-(
See, I broke one of my cardinal rules. I was in a rush because my wife had a doctors appointment in the afternoon so I had to get the removal done ASAP to get home and watch the babies.. Rigged some pieces bigger than I would have, and put too much faith in the groundie.When I work with groundies of little experience or who I don't know I make sure to rig so that I am 100% safe...in other words take smaller pieces and use simple rigging where they just need to lower...most of these guys panic and do weird shit..
Not blaming him, I clearly take responsibility in my original post.If I had tied a piece of a tree to a rope, cut it loose from the tree and that same piece somehow came back and smashed into me, I'd have a hard time blaming anyone but myself.
@Drewtree; Getting in a hurry is one of the classic ways to end up hurting yourself
The key is to try to figure out what kind of thought process can help us to prevent a similar type of incident in the future. Thanks again for raising the issue.
Tim
The acknowledgement of time constraints did happen, and it definitely led to different work techniques! Hah.Yes, on many jobs Monday starts with the boss yelling, "lets get moving we are already behind and losing money".
Unfortunately it seems tree workers often want rules made just for them, whereas safety is about so much more than the specifics of working on rope.
When we look at the current situation we can easily blame two new workers together, incorrect friction handling, incorrect rigging and cutting, etc. but as TimBr points out thought process is important. This is why every job needs a hazard/risk analysis and mitigation thought out and planned out, not just simple formulaic response. The acknowledgement of time constraint may have led to different work techniques.
There was a book written about this type of thing. It's called The Right Mountain. You have to be on the right mountain in your head and mind or people will get hurt even die. While you were in the right tree your head was elsewhere with your own groundies. This book's lessons really stuck with me. Good read.time not impossible or unreasonable (HAD I been using one of my own experienced grounds men)
That's the human factor.... a good lesson for all... maybe late starts should be considered a safety factor..See, I broke one of my cardinal rules. I was in a rush because my wife had a doctors appointment in the afternoon so I had to get the removal done ASAP to get home and watch the babies.. Rigged some pieces bigger than I would have, and put too much faith in the groundie.
Absolutely! A late start can be the first domino to fall leading to a rush to get all the work scheduled done regardless of prevailing conditions. What caused the late start? Does it impact on worker effectiveness? Has it created a preoccupation for anyone or all that isn't job related? Can we reasonably shift the scheduled work into later hours of the day, weather, daylight, traffic, ability of crew to work later, client requirements taken into account? Can we substitute part of the scheduled work for other jobs that will better fit into the time available?maybe late starts should be considered a safety factor..
The acknowledgement of time constraints did happen, and it definitely led to different work techniques! Hah.
Really in this case it was simple..
. I was on a contract climb removing for another company
. I was aware of a need to finish by a certain time, a time not impossible or unreasonable (HAD I been using one of my own experienced grounds men) but much sooner than I would have given the circumstances.
Circumstances : lots of targets, small backyard, comm cables flanking the yard to the house and the neighbours, first time working with this groundsman and although there was a lead up to this moment where I was testing his ability with larger pieces and he was displaying competency, I didn't expect his point of failure to be so low.
I agree though, production work is fraught with time constraints and pressure, it's enough to kill a man.. and it often does just that.
That's an important thing to know in all communications but espescially with tag team work. During one of my educations we did a popular exercise and our minds were blown. Take 5 students out of the room. Tell one student still in the class a simple story. For example "Jane gave Sam a blue pen". Then bring in the students in the hall one at a time and have them relay the info to the next. By the third info transfer Janice was giving Bob a yellow pen. The facts deteriated from there. If each had repeated and confirmed to the prior it would of stayed accurate.I see. One other climber on this forum requires his groundies to repeat his instructions back to him, in an attempt to be certain that they're listening, and have processed and understood the climber's instructions. I don't know if it seems to make a difference in how things go for him, or not. Might be worth a try, though. Call and response, I think he calls it.
Tim