Report resulted in 37 indictments and 7 guilty pleas. DOJ will not make the same mistake this time. They are going to drop the hammer on this fool this time. Let all the fat dudes in their wallmart tactical gear jump up and down all they want.
doesnt really matter what stories lead to the investigation, its what they found that matters. If the police get called out a call for J walking and no one is J walking but there is a murder going one it doesnt make the murder nonexsistant
He wasnt being knee capped for being a Russian agent. Maybe a better reading and understanding would enlighten you on your lack of understanding of what the report was about. Solid evidence he colluded just that Mueller wouldnt recommend indictment of a sitting president. Sounds like you...
Do you mean the time when instead of recommending indicting Trump for collusion with Russia they left it up to congress. Resulting in the the AG Barr totalling spinning the finds of the report into what the Rep congress claimed was an exoneration of Trump. Robert Mueller totally blew it...
Thats fine, but its what we got. Best to let it playout. You may not like the outcome but this how or system works. In my view the best system in the world.
Voting on a speed limit is different than voting on allowing flag burning. One action, speeding affects others. The flag burning doesnt affect others. This is the defining difference.
That responses reads yep big assumption thats been feed to me.
People have the freedom to burn the flag. Them burning the flag doesnt affect me. I find it offensive and insulting, however I would vote infavor of allowing them to do it. Voting to not allow it based on my dislike that has no...
Honestly I would do the same, my time is too valuable. However I would support these people s rights to stand up for themselves because I am not in their shoes.
And you make this assumption based on what? Our legal system requires a trail with evidence and arguements from boths sides. You seems to completely abandon this when it suits your political narrative.
Here is my read. It is about the defination freedom. Freedom is being allowed to do what you want if it doesnt affect others directly. Something percieved in your mind doesnt count. . Voting to not allow other people to engage in actions that dont effect others is unamerican. Example my burning...
I dont think that was the context of Rico's question. More along the line of what if you went into a resturant and they said sorry no service for you based on a personal trait of yours. Say skin color, hair style, cloths etc
This is reasonable response from your view point, disagree but can accept it. I guess we have a different view of evil. I too try and acknowledge my short comings and work on changing them. Curious on your view of assualt weapons. After all many children died at Sandy hook as a result of these...
Would I vote for a law that allows peolple to burn the flag and kneel for the national anthem, yes. Would I personally ingage in this behavior, as a veteran most definately not. Freedom doesnt mean I must agree on like it. What these people are doing doesnt effect you but only in your mind.
I appreciate your direct anwser. I am ok with being in disagreement. I choose to not worry what other people do. I focus on being the best person I can be and treating people right and taking care of my family. I think we may have some common ground there. Just a different approach.
"Somewhat friends" is disingenuous, dishonest and phony. What is that? Disdain with a thin veneer of fake friendliness to facilitate the making of money. How would making a cake for someone be forcing anything on you any more than doing their tree work? I am guessing because it involves...