Fu*%face Von Clownstick

Bucknut said:
Many (if not most) nationally prominent Dems will tell you that men can literally become pregnant.
Click to expand...
Bucknut

You've been asked politely several times to backup what you say.

Even for the boundaries of Tree Free Zone you're going way off. You're on target to land in Time Out corner.

Time for some links, even from Faux Entertainment et al.
 
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
 
Bucknut said:
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
Click to expand...
Listen to the Biden clip again. He is talking about abortion bans and how they effect woman and his final word MEN was that it effects men also because men after all are the 2nd part of the pregnancy equation. He was not saying it affects men because they are banned from abortion. This is an example of out of context cherry picking garbage.
 
I’ll extend this olive branch: not even Joe knows what the hell he was saying. Then or now.

Do I dare ask you: What is a woman? (Hint: it’s not complicated)

For the record, I’m willing to drop this derail topic and get back to talking all things Trump unless y’all want to keep going.
 
Bucknut said:
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
Click to expand...
I am happy to engage in intelligent conversation with. you. Gender and what biology someone is assigned at birth is not the same thing. Woman and "human female" are not interchangable. One is gender one is biological assignment. Funny how people ramble on about how much cense the Trinty makes but cant wrap their mind around this. Who am I to say what people should believe and think in their own heart and mind. People are asking to be respected so I give this respect. Freedom doesnt mean having to like what others want or express. No one is saying a human assigned male at birth can be preganent, a human assigned female at birth who identifies as a man (gender) can get preganent. People are simply respect their request to be identified by their choosen gender. Your arguement insists on refusing to respect how someone views themselves.
 
Last edited:
Bucknut said:
I’ll extend this olive branch: not even Joe knows what the hell he was saying. Then or now.

Do I dare ask you: What is a woman? (Hint: it’s not complicated)

For the record, I’m willing to drop this derail topic and get back to talking all things Trump unless y’all want to keep going.
Click to expand...
Come on Buck, prety clear what Joe is talking about, admittely a bit garbled and stuttery but he is talking that abortion bans take away womens rights. Agree or disagree thats what that short cut out snipit was. titling it men can get preganent and abortions is totally dishonest. And yes defination of a woman is complicated for some people, maybe not you but for some people. Compassion and respect for others is the root here. I invite you to think on this.
 
Last edited:
Bucknut said:
I realize this is a HUUUGE derail, but I've been given an assignment, so here's a bit of my homework. If one wants to argue that both parties have gone mental, fine. But to claim the dems have the monopoly on sanity is LOL funny. The truth is that any prominent (or even aspirational) dem today MUST fall in line with the extreme dogma of the radical LGBT alphabet crowd. They believe that trans men actually are men, and therefore by extension, can get pregnant (as a man). Anyone who challenges this is immediately outcast as a bigot, transphobe, or domestic terrorist/inciter of violence. My God, we've reached a point where our newest Supreme Court Justice refuses to answer the question, "What is a woman?" Why would she refuse this? Does anyone believe she doesn't know what a woman is? Of course she knows, but she's AFRAID to say it for fear of being set upon by the "progressive" mob. Even from her, they demand absolute fealty. Fear is not a good trait in a Sup Ct Justice.

No democrat may deviate from this orthodoxy. Don't believe me? Find me evidence of one dem who will honestly and correctly define what a woman is: an adult human female. Not because they don't know. But because they're afraid to admit that they do know. Which is scarier: a politician who literally believes a man can get pregnant, or one who is too chickenshit to admit it's not possible? I'm not sure either, but our government is chock full of the latter.

aoc-fauns-professor-who-says-men-can-get-pregnant

senate-democrats-insist-men-can-get-pregnant

report-nearly-one-in-four-democrats-say-men-can-get-pregnant-n623825


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Lastly, I gotta admit my surprise that out of all the hyperventilating, hyperbolic horseshit that this thread has reliably churned out over these last few years, this is the topic that kicks the hornet's nest? I can be a smart ass, and I have occasionally stirred the pot. But I've always tried to remain civil. I have had discussions with other Buzzers publicly on this thread and in DM's about the importance of not typing terribly personal things that one wouldn't say to another's face. I think a few guys who vehemently disagree with my politics would back me up on that, and I trust they are honorable enough to do so.
Click to expand...
In this 1st video this guy looks like a total ass. The doctor answered his question. he was just too blind and arragant to relize she anwsered it. Then he bullied and kept interupting her when he didnt get the answer he wanted. He wasnt looking for an answer. He was projecting. He was doing exactly what he accused her of doing. Sad defense of your arguement.
 
owScott said:
Gender and what biology someone is assigned at birth is not the same thing.
Click to expand...
It is very much the same thing. The plumbing you have dictates your gender: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/female

If somebody is more masculine than typical of a woman or more feminine that a typical male, that's ok. But to say I'm really a woman in a man's body is ridiculous. This is why we have cauliflower crust being used on pizza...we can just make anything what we want it to be.
 
Bucknut said:
I’ll extend this olive branch: not even Joe knows what the hell he was saying. Then or now.

Do I dare ask you: What is a woman? (Hint: it’s not complicated)

For the record, I’m willing to drop this derail topic and get back to talking all things Trump unless y’all want to keep going.
Click to expand...
I am curious why you feel so threatened by transgenderism Buck? I have friends and family members who are transgender and I can assure you they are no different than you and I. They want to live their lives with as they see fit and be afforded all the same privileges, protections, and freedoms as you and I.
 
Rusticus said:
It is very much the same thing. The plumbing you have dictates your gender: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/female

If somebody is more masculine than typical of a woman or more feminine that a typical male, that's ok. But to say I'm really a woman in a man's body is ridiculous. This is why we have cauliflower crust being used on pizza...we can just make anything what we want it to be.
Click to expand...
You may try defining gender or clicking on the part on your link that says gender identity. For some people cauliflower crust is how pizza should be. You are saying , no if pizza isnt how I define it its not pizza.
 
Rusticus said:
It is very much the same thing. The plumbing you have dictates your gender: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/female

If somebody is more masculine than typical of a woman or more feminine that a typical male, that's ok. But to say I'm really a woman in a man's body is ridiculous. This is why we have cauliflower crust being used on pizza...we can just make anything what we want it to be.
Click to expand...
Speaking of ridiculous, could you imagine conflating gender identity with pizza crust? Now that fucking ridiculous!
 
rico said:
I am curious why you feel so threatened by transgenderism Buck? I have friends and family members who are transgender and I can assure you they are no different than you and I. They want to live their lives with as they see fit and be afforded all the same privileges, protections, and freedoms as you and I.
Click to expand...
Understand, this portion of the population defines freedom as do what you like unless I do not like it or understand it. Closely related to fake patriotism.
 
Why does anyone give a rat's ass what other people do with their bodies, or who other people love. If a man wants to be a woman, or a woman want to be a man, what skin is it off your nose? If two fellows want to be married and love each other, is it going to make your life miserable?
I think everybody should just mind their own business and let other do whatever they want with themselves that make them happier people. And let's quit arguing about, what is a woman. The question is argumentative from the get go, just trying to provoke a non-response.
How about getting back to doing their job of running the country and stop with the childish banter.
 
Rusticus said:
It is very much the same thing. The plumbing you have dictates your gender: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/female

If somebody is more masculine than typical of a woman or more feminine that a typical male, that's ok. But to say I'm really a woman in a man's body is ridiculous. This is why we have cauliflower crust being used on pizza...we can just make anything what we want it to be.
Click to expand...
No where on that page does it say biological equipment dictates gender. Gender is a social construct. Once again I invite you to click on the gender identity part on the link you posted.
 
Shadowscape said:
Why does anyone give a rat's ass what other people do with their bodies, or who other people love. If a man wants to be a woman, or a woman want to be a man, what skin is it off your nose? If two fellows want to be married and love each other, is it going to make your life miserable?
I think everybody should just mind their own business and let other do whatever they want with themselves that make them happier people. And let's quit arguing about, what is a woman. The question is argumentative from the get go, just trying to provoke a non-response.
How about getting back to doing their job of running the country and stop with the childish banter.
Click to expand...
I agree, the part that burns my ass is these same people want government control all over these things but when it come to "religious libertys", gun control, enviromental regs they are a total hands off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom