to top or not to top...
what a question! In my short career i've been on both sides of the ethical fence. First i was brought up dead against it. DEAD against it. bad bad bad. Then i changed employers, and this one had a slightly different view... or so it seemed. We topped a tree. yeah... that's right, a nasty, gnarled, coat rack loomed in the customers front yard weeping even as we drove away.
the justification? the customers were first thinking of removing the tree. The compromise was that if we just cut it back into a compact and woody form they would build a little tree house up there and the world would spin on a-whistlin' and all that.
so to this day, over a year later, i drive by the tree often and there is no tree house. just an ever thickenning bush. but i digress...
So i began to justify my very occasional obligation (being as i am just a lowly emplyEE) to top. i took comfort in the knowledge that my boss truly cares about trees and his ability to benefit them through his profession. I know he does all he can to talk our customers out of it. He'll even argue. but sometimes a person just wants it done. i decided that, "hey, they're not my trees. they belong to the customer who can do what he likes with them."
today, my opinion varies just slightly. The trees do belong to the customer, but, you know what? sometimes property owners are morons. I've had countless people approach me on the job, asking whether we could remove this tree or that... beautiful trees! a specimen, perfectly formed redwood - an icon from blocks around- so he could put in a trailer park and no doubt pack the tiny spaces with cotonwoods and mulberrys. A HUGE Cedar of Lebanon standing grandly over half a block in the center of town, and the owner wants it out so he can just slightly expande his business parking lot. The biggest black locust on an historic street which we trimmed well and properly, end-weight reduction cuts and all, and he's pissed off cause the thing isn't fifteen feet tall.
people ask every day that we top or remove this tree or that. Most, once they're educated, are open to us doing what we do: the scientific, tried and true right thing. but others don't care for an education. There are SOME cases where we'll do the wrong thing. We'll top a dinky old tree that shouldn't be topped only because some battles aren't worth fighting, and some minds just aren't going to change. Other times... MOST times, we'd sooner walk away from the work. There is a matter of dignity, and perhaps moreover a matter of namesake. i take great pride in the company i work for and the work that i do. I am proud to lurk around this forum, to bury myself in literature, and strive to improve all for the sake of learning to do better and better work.
So while it may hurt my feelings to top a tree or remove one that should stay, In the long run, i think it hurts the company's name more. In my town there is a clear line between the crews who do good work and the ones who do what they must to make some money. Both sides have their place, but as the community becomes slowly more educated, they'll become more and more interested not in obedience but in quality. i'm proud to know that i'm one of the good guys. I'm proud to know that sometimes we pass up work to protect our name and i know our work will be more steady, or at the very least look better because of it.
but in the end, when we drive by the other guys, we still wave, after all, we're all tree guys....
...and that's all i have to say about that...