- Location
- Retired in Minneapolis
The issue of needing a stronger TIP is important to consider. But...this rarely limits my choices. If we try to calculate a sufficient safety factor, we're probably tieing into points that are plenty strong.
When I set a TIP from the ground and then want to move higher I can re-thread the working end of my line up into the higher TIP. The same goes for natural redirects. When it's time to clear the rope, there aren't any false crotches to retrieve. This does mean that I have to handle some rope though. Since the rope doesn't move in SRT I don't need to have pulleys to reduce rope drag. If I want to set up a sling redi all I need is a sling and biner.
Moving up the tree is a bit of a limitation. Even so, it seems to me that at the end of the day, I work less. Putting on the RADS system isn't too big a deal. I do have to pay attention to my route more though. As long as my feet are on the tree I can move up the rope faster than trad climbing. Since SRT is 1:1 and not 2:1 in trad, tailing rope is quicker.
I've been using the Gri Gri but will be getting an I'd this week. I can't see any other tools on the market that would be acceptable for tree workers. Using figure eights for friction isn't a good idea in my opinion but that's fodder for another thread
In a head to head working climb I think that both systems would come out close in time but SRT would be ahead in most situations. If we could measure the amount of energy used for both climbs, SRT would be the winner. I can say this because I've been tinkering with SRT for several years and have kept an open mind during the process. I have the luxury of setting the pace on the job. Since I own the company I'm under a different schedule.
Tom
When I set a TIP from the ground and then want to move higher I can re-thread the working end of my line up into the higher TIP. The same goes for natural redirects. When it's time to clear the rope, there aren't any false crotches to retrieve. This does mean that I have to handle some rope though. Since the rope doesn't move in SRT I don't need to have pulleys to reduce rope drag. If I want to set up a sling redi all I need is a sling and biner.
Moving up the tree is a bit of a limitation. Even so, it seems to me that at the end of the day, I work less. Putting on the RADS system isn't too big a deal. I do have to pay attention to my route more though. As long as my feet are on the tree I can move up the rope faster than trad climbing. Since SRT is 1:1 and not 2:1 in trad, tailing rope is quicker.
I've been using the Gri Gri but will be getting an I'd this week. I can't see any other tools on the market that would be acceptable for tree workers. Using figure eights for friction isn't a good idea in my opinion but that's fodder for another thread
In a head to head working climb I think that both systems would come out close in time but SRT would be ahead in most situations. If we could measure the amount of energy used for both climbs, SRT would be the winner. I can say this because I've been tinkering with SRT for several years and have kept an open mind during the process. I have the luxury of setting the pace on the job. Since I own the company I'm under a different schedule.
Tom