What do you Euro's think abou this?

Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

I am no Euro but I feel that article neglects to mention the real and present danger presented by Christian Extremist terrorists, Zionist extremist terorists, as well as capitalist profit hungry terrorists. Islamic fascists are no worse than any of the other fascists that I see ripping us all off. They all suck. Arseholes.
None of them should be appeased.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

[ QUOTE ]
I am no Euro but I feel that article neglects to mention the real and present danger presented by Christian Extremist terrorists, Zionist extremist terorists, as well as capitalist profit hungry terrorists. Islamic fascists are no worse than any of the other fascists that I see ripping us all off. They all suck. Arseholes.
None of them should be appeased.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously?
thinking.gif
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

The article made it seem that bush was making some kind of huge sacrifice in order to fight the islamists, like he personally is impoverishing himself.
Thats crazy, homeboy and his boys are laughing their way all the way to the bank. They are making billions off of this supposed war on terror. Its a little fishy to me as a matter of fact. Truthfully, He is loving it that the dollar is getting weaker and weaker. He has basically said as much. The other people benifitng from "the war on terror" happen to be islamist extremist governments in the middle east.

Another eror in that article was that Iraq was not a case of Islamic extremism, Saddam was an arsehole to be sure, but his government was one of the more secular places in the middle east. Women held high positions in government, you could buy alcohol on the street, women were not required to cover themselves, and there was relative freedom of religion. As a point, Saddam in the early 80's payed for a chaldean (iraqi christian) church and community center about 5 blocks from my house in Detroit. The islamists hated him as much as anyone.

Also, what about the apeasement of the Israelis? If you recall, Manachem Begin used blatant terrorist tacticts, (blowing up hotels, massacreing villages) in order to get Israel founded in the first place. The thing is that his tactics worked. Much as the palestinian bombers suck, they learned that terrorism worked, from who else? the zionists. (Not to be confused with the jews, just as the palestinian movement should not be confused with islam).

But basically I wish I could believe that Bush and friends are nobel warriors fighting the bad guys. But frankly, well no, they are just making themselves rich the easiest way they know how which is to steal.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

True on most parts.

Hell I am very thankful that 'we' were liberated by the Polish, British, Canadian and last but not least American soldiers in the second world war.

What I am not thankful of is that [censored] sr, Regan, and LAST BUT NOT LEAST B ush jr(hope the slander bot will not reject it this time) have created a climate where religious fundamentalists are CREATED.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

[ QUOTE ]
I found this article on the internet. What do you think about this?

Is it true of false?

[/ QUOTE ]

You have a lot to learn about the world Notahacker.

Start by using serious source material, not Snopes.com which has found itself fall foul of indecency laws on more than one occasion. Does your wife know you look up that shite?

Bet she doesn't.

You could get yourself into a lot of bother if you continue to use that site. I know from 2 different sources, IT specialists working in large government organisations that Snopes.com is flagged and monitored by the FBI, Mi6 and Mossad etc.

Be careful, there is some serious shite on that website. Coded hidden links etc.
to not very nice places.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

This article shows that freedom of speach is still a well appreaciated human right in Europe. It speaks the authors opinion.
Svein
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

Be careful about any nationalist's hateful spew against other cultures (re: colors of skin).

When we Americans say "support the troops" we only mean the good-looking ones who don't get wounded and parade around with limbs missing later back stateside and can find little in promised benefits, none for adaquate long-term health care, and certainly almost no job offers from the business owners who fly their flag.

The louder some zealot speaks the more crap they spew.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

Expressing racism and blasfeism is not within the freedom of speach, however it takes a lot to be regarded as such according to several trials where there were no centence passed upon the defendent.
Freedom of speach means that individuals have the right to express their meanings allthough they are controversial, maybe offending in rare cases or against the government. (Look what happened to the Dixie Chicks) Freedom of speach is the basal right in a democraty and a guarantee against "strong" leaders taking charge.
Svein
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

[ QUOTE ]

Did the article have a valid point, or not?

[/ QUOTE ]

The point was that Europe isn't taking a stance on the Islamic thing, that they have a history of apathetic attitude to taking action ... citing Hitler and Kosovo etc.

On the other hand it could be said they mind their own business and look within. The glory goes to Bush who has jeopardised the US economy for a cause, a cause that is seen as a serious threat ... and that's where the flaw is, the authors interpretation of what is glory and courage.

Frankly, I'd prefer it if Australia had stuff all to do with Bush too and took the Euro approach on this issue. no-one did chit to us till we sided with that guy ... remember the Madrid train bombings? That got Spain out of Bushes clasp, a wake up call. we had bombings in Bali but didn't pull Aussies out of Iraq.

Why does an enemy of USA have to automatically be an enemy of us ... we didn't get bombed?
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

Don't confuse apathy or appeasement with respecting another country's soverienty.

Hard to say the Euro crowd isn't taking a stance on the islam thing. They have fought them off for centuries now. Is it so bad if someone else hold the torch for a while?

They have had riots in France in the last year over the "islamic issue".

It is easy for others to armchair safely away in USA or Australia, but Europe shares a border with isalmic countries.

Appeasement is not the answer, nor is isolationism.


.02
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

There is no such thing as Europe, only France. Germany, UK, Spain, Holland, Italy etc etc.

They are all very different countries and cultures. Who have been fighting each other since time began. They just prretend to like each other to con the USA and Australia and anybody else dumb enough to listen to their rhetoric.

They do share one common trait though, Their dislike of Islam.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

They have the EU now, and a Euro Dollar, are any islamic countries in the EU or wanting to be?

USA shares a border with Mexico, now they're gonna build the Great Wall of Texas.
grin.gif
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

Yeup, got to keep those mexicans out so they dont take our tree jobs!
Honestly, sometimes I am ashamed to be american which is really sad because I really do love this land. I guess I just dont understand the concept of borders. Dont fence me in.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

[ QUOTE ]
are any islamic countries in the EU or wanting to be?


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes - Turkey, but the rest of Europe are not happy at the prospect of this.

Never tell someone from the UK they are European.

The UK is the 51st state of the USA.

Britain used to run the world before the USA.

The big difference is that the Brits wanted to stay and colonise the countries - India, China, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Australia, Carribean Islands etc where as the Americans just want to take all the money and resources out of the countries its involved with and run back with it all to the good ol US of A.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

And then we get upset when all the people from the countries we rip off follow all their resources and swarm our borders.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

[ QUOTE ]

The big difference is that the Brits wanted to stay and colonise the countries - India, China, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Australia, Carribean Islands etc where as the Americans just want to take all the money and resources out of the countries its involved with and run back with it all to the good ol US of A.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, that's the funniest thing I read in a long time.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

[ QUOTE ]
The big difference is that the Brits wanted to stay and colonise the countries

[/ QUOTE ]

The big part you left out is that colonizing = displacing, enslaving, or killing the people who live in those countries.
 
Re: What do you Euro\'s think abou this?

True, just like the Americans who slaughtered thousands of native american indians. So they could rape the land and build McDonalds everywhere.

Once they had filled up America with McDonalds they went on to colonise the world with McDonalds.

What has America given the world, McDonalds.

Thanks America.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom