Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the noob remark got you, you must feel that way about yourself....
Really though, I would try not to take me so seriously.
And for the record, it's okay to have an opinion that varies from Richard's.
...
And for the record, it's okay to have an opinion that varies from Richard's.
It makes me realize we can do more to figure this out. I do think it takes more than seconds to evaluate a sustained load and I'm still of the opinion a bounce that applies an unknown force in an intermittent nature unlike our climb does not give reliable results.Richard, has your opinion changed on this matter in light of the 2 recent tip failures which occurred after the tip had been loaded with more weight than the climber?
Well, better get started then.Good deal, Richard. My brother thinks you may actually figure out how to roughly rate a tree anchor in ten years or so.
Sorry for the repeat post but I'm really happy to see other verification of this.Since making this video and doing some research and testing...
I set the primary support point, either basal or cinched.
If I'm totally comfortable with it I climb it, no stress test or bounce check.
If I think it needs verification, I give it a sustained stress to 2 times the anticipated load.
If there are three of us, I will have two of us stand on the line with foot ascenders while the 3rd makes observations.
If there are two of us, I will do the mechanical advantage to 2X the load while the other observes.
If I'm by myself, I set the MA method and quietly and with patience observe the anchor giving it time to respond.
Whether by foot ascender or MA or any other means, I hope that we see less TIP failures.