Re: Rules for \"put it on the ground\"
[ QUOTE ]
What are the rules you try to abide by when the customer just wants the tree or branches put on the ground?
I offer a few of my rules. Thanks for the comments. It does offer a great chance to understand the topic to a greater depth.
First off, I always appreciate a spelling and thesaurus check. As "irregardless" hasn't ever been an opportunity on the SCRABBLE board, i haven't ever checked it in webster's during a point protest, and didn't realize they hadn't picked it up yet. Usually they will add words after they are in use after a certain point in time. What could that word be replaced by? "Not in spite of".
However, after doing a google search, i found it is actually a word.
You must have heard this from a past English teacher, and he was right, but wrong. It accepted. But not embraced by all scholars.
For your review:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
Now onto another point brought up regarding my entire statement "the most bad advice I have ever heard in a long time". Sometimes the truth hurts. Right? Can we all admit that? Come on and be real, you aren't fooling anyone. I drop trees. Of course. Its a viable option. It's the method I argued.
Review my statement if you actually read it and understood it to begin with. It appears a couple protesters haven't grasped its core. In summary, it is this:
Be responsible. Be ethical. Consider liabilities that you are creating and will be held responsible for in a court of law if the right situation were to present itself: (ie, leaving widow makers, bent of sapplings, unreleased holding wood at the base). All these have the potential to harm those that enter the scene after you leave. This creates a liability issue. Not in spite of the fact that you removed one hazard from the property. Rather, a creation of other hazards occurred in the process.
Don't leave yourself exposed, offer environmentally friendly options that could also save money, be creative.
What I stated to be activity that is unprofessional is this: Just dropping a tree and leaving, without having given the client an "informed choice". Don't think it doesn't apply here. It does. Really, we aren't just out for the money here. You may be, and great if you are. To each his own. That quest can really make life an interesting game. However, the money will be after you, and quick, if you truly look out for the clients best interest.
I would have to counter the comment about there being "more money for the rest of us" if I hold to my lofty standards. I can only say that your opinion is true. It is 100% true. There will be more "money" for you. This is irredeemable for "quality" however. You get paid. OK. Point taken.
Those jobs will always be there for us. The more we do, the more we get paid. Its irrefutable. Unless we consider the one chance in maybe 2,500 that a home owner shall be maimed from any portion of the work which is left incomplete and hazardous, and they happen to follow up on "why". That could cost a lot of legal representation, explanation, and unecessary emotional baggage and possible legal ramifications. I would think that the cost of this to a business could be devestating.
To avoid this, maybe a disclaimer form can be provided to the customer that provides in detail the scope of the work that you are providing. Further, detail the hazards that will be left behind. Show them afterwards what the hazards are, have them sign it, get your money and go. Would you feel comfortable if someone was hurt though? Probably not. Rather than a disclaimer, just bid it into the job to do it correctly. I don't like all the extra paper work, and hate those pharmaceutical drug commercial disclaimers at the ends of commercials. Imagine that.
I drop big dead trees occasionally, or crane them out. Usually I am very clear in advance as to collateral damage potential, and I price it in. Of course, not everyone can afford to pay for a complete removal. Not everyone wants to either. That's acceptable. But don't compromise liability exposure for profit. That's plain foolishness. In today's world that's asking for trouble.
I climb out adject trees that are damaged. I don't leave traps. How is this "lofty and dogmatic". These are my rules. I price it in. If i don't get the job, that's OK. I haven't been out of work since I got in this business over 15 years ago. I am glad to know I am not taking all of your work away from you. Why all the complaints about doing a job to a higher level? As I said, the truth hurts, and i am sorry to have ruined the party. Wasn't that the original request here? State your rules. Every situation is different. It's not like we all don't know exactly what is being said here.
We can be the "drop and leave with hazards guy". There is a place in the forest for that. I won't fight for that niche. Sometimes it comes up on the schedule. I find that as I demanded a higher level of quality out of myself, I began to attract a higher level of client. I think that goes without saying for every profession, and we can all probably realize that. At times, there are these situations that we can be proposed, and we need to be cautious. Thats all. If all you want to do is this type of work, and leave hazards then do it. You will get a lot of it, because its out there.
Properly thinking through a business plan can encompass a more "wholistic" approach to the problem of tree removal and also accurately identify the bottom line. Its truly artwork, and there are many ways to express it. Just cover all the bases, thats all. Most major business failures occur from an unknown or "covered up" element. Ignorance of available facts is not an argument to defend negligent behavior. Its a big game out there. CYA.
Gentlemen, start your engines.