Frax
Participating member
[ QUOTE ]
Frax, I appreciate your honesty as well... just one thing you said seems to be a bit over my head... "Two hands 99% of the time just feels better for me and gives me the degree of control I'm comfortable with. I'm not motivated by it being a rule except to the extent an employer would require it."
...it's the second sentence that i'm finding a hard time understanding. Should the employer have the freedom of saying yes or no (to one-handling)... after all it's his comp insurance or image, that may be affected?
Two hands on the saw, unless you choose otherwise!
[/ QUOTE ]
That's what I'm saying. If the employer required it, then that's what I'd stick to unless....(there is always an 'unless' for those who can exercise some judgement)... there was absolutely no other safe option, like in X's scenario. (for me, that's the 1%).
Frax, I appreciate your honesty as well... just one thing you said seems to be a bit over my head... "Two hands 99% of the time just feels better for me and gives me the degree of control I'm comfortable with. I'm not motivated by it being a rule except to the extent an employer would require it."
...it's the second sentence that i'm finding a hard time understanding. Should the employer have the freedom of saying yes or no (to one-handling)... after all it's his comp insurance or image, that may be affected?
Two hands on the saw, unless you choose otherwise!
[/ QUOTE ]
That's what I'm saying. If the employer required it, then that's what I'd stick to unless....(there is always an 'unless' for those who can exercise some judgement)... there was absolutely no other safe option, like in X's scenario. (for me, that's the 1%).