How did I miss this thread? Albizia saman (yes sorry they're Albizia's now) are how we make a living, have spent the last 16yrs looking after various collections of pretty old trees. Years ago used to remove the epicormic suckers as well now we are much more circumspect about it. Remember that the tree (or very large limb) that is producing epicormic growth reflects an alteration in the flow and control of Auxin and gibberellin, to remove all such suckers from the internal structure of the limbs, whilst it satisfys the clients' demands really is doing no favours to the tree.
The reason why A. saman are able to persist despite excessive lionstailing (not a comment on your photos but generally) and much much worse relates to the growth nature of the species. Massive horizontal scaffold limbs (37.5m stem to canopy edge was the longest one I've worked on) are almost entirely autonimous in mature trees, and carry enormous carbohydrate reserves. The only trees I've worked on that are tougher than A. saman are Ficus spp. The internal arrangement of tension and compression wood is a physicists dream, I'll post a heap of photos of some of my babies starting with the 75m wide monster, the limb you're looking at is 1.9m in diameter top to bottom and 35m long, I estimate its weight at around 12Tonnes, imagine trying to engineer a steel beam that size and wieght...good luck.
The reason why we stopped removing all epicormics on some of our babies was that with such large autonimous structures within the larger unit of the tree when problems arise..longicorn borer, root damage, soil compaction etc the epicormics can and do provide additional energy supply precisely in the area of the limb where the cambium has detected trouble. You'll see what I mean in later photos.
PS I have to agree with Leon....relax people, you know the biggest problem with reading posts is that you can't hear the inflexion in the voice of the person typing (of course) so we place emotion and intention into lots of what we read that may well not have been there whe the post was typed.