Min Strenght of components.

[ QUOTE ]


An example of ITCC moving faster than ANSI?

[/ QUOTE ]

Awkward.
fruit.gif


[/ QUOTE ]
I redact the "awkward".
boink.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]

Comparing apples to avacadoes...not applicable...sport v. work...how much clearer can this be?

[/ QUOTE ]

They are both fruits....

"The International Tree Climbing Championship committee’s purpose is to provide a competitive but educational opportunity for working Arborists to demonstrate and exchange new climbing techniques, increase the interaction between various firms and members in the industry, and provide positive public exposure for the profession. "

This doesn't have anything to do with working arborists?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Comparing apples to avacadoes...not applicable...sport v. work...how much clearer can this be?

[/ QUOTE ]

Than a climber should be able to use pretty much any tool he see's fit to comp climb, by your terms Tom. I should be able to climb with any helmet type of impact helmet I see fit, like they do overseas. Yet we are forced to wear a work type helmet. I should be able to foot lock on the hitch I choose, yet we can only use 1 of 2. Why are safty glasses needed if we anit even working?
 
The 'rules' of the ITCC only apply to ITCC. You can't use Z133 or CE or HSE...etc. in the international arena.

From what I understand about standards I'd rather see more use of CE style regulations. OSHA/ANSI/ITCC is what we have so that's what I use.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom