Serf Life
Been here much more than a while
- Location
- Maine Island
Heresy I tell you!I miss the 440 none at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heresy I tell you!I miss the 440 none at all.
When I pick up an 880, I wish I was holding a 660 instead!.....
If I had it to do over I would have forked out the extra cash for an 880 instead of the 660. When I reach for the 660, I am really wanting an 880, every single time.
....
Last 3 removals I did were over 60" in diameter. I was using practically all of the 36" bar on both sides to get through the heartwood. All of them were oaks (1 white, 2 post).....so yeah, an 880 would have been really nice......and a longer bar. 36" wasn't enough to do the thing properly.When I pick up an 880, I wish I was holding a 660 instead!
It has its place (I don't own either...by biggest is a 12 year old 385XP), but I try really hard not to do big removals so I don't have need. But man...those are heavy suckers. Most of the timber cutters I work with on the forestry side are using either a 661 or 395XP. They have an 880 or 3120 in the trunk, but it doesn't come out unless the tree goes over 40" dbh.
I have always felt that pound for pound and cc for cc a Husky will pull a longer bar than a Stihl. This is a very important factor for me. I have been running a 42" on my bone stock 395XP's for years with great results. On paper a Stihl 661 should pull a 42" bar, but in my limited experience it didn't do so well running a 42". Why is that?Last 3 removals I did were over 60" in diameter. I was using practically all of the 36" bar on both sides to get through the heartwood. All of them were oaks (1 white, 2 post).....so yeah, an 880 would have been really nice......and a longer bar. 36" wasn't enough to do the thing properly.
For multiple city trees at 36" dbh, I'd take the two 660s.I never had an 880,always wanted one though,are they worth the money?If you had to chose would you take two sharp 660s or one sharp 880 ,like if your doing municiple job removing 6 or 8 36+ dbh hardwoods
I've run a 42 on a 660. It works, but you can bring it to a dead stop easily if your rakers are even just a *little* too low. Never had the opportunity to run a large husky.I have always felt that pound for pound and cc for cc a Husky will pull a longer bar than a Stihl. This is a very important factor for me. I have been running a 42" on my bone stock 395XP's for years with great results. On paper a Stihl 661 should pull a 42" bar, but in my limited experience it didn't do so well running a 42". Why is that?
7 tooth sprocket and chain slightly on loose side also seems to help,thats been my best luck with long bars on 660,never ran the husky but sounds like more torque even if specs say otherwiseI've run a 42 on a 660. It works, but you can bring it to a dead stop easily if your rakers are even just a *little* too low. Never had the opportunity to run a large husky.
Lol, IDK man. The 440 never seemed to be able to do much more than a 361 and was noticeably heavier.Heresy I tell you!
Yeah one of these days I want to go play around for a couple of days with the local harvesters and see what's what on the big saws. I've always been a stihl guy but if the big husky saws really are better I'm willing to have my mind changed.7 tooth sprocket and chain slightly on loose side also seems to help,thats been my best luck with long bars on 660,never ran the husky but sounds like more torque even if specs say otherwise
I took a couple homeowner saws in on trade for a pickup i was selling,one was a 455 rancher,its acctually pretty nice on 20 some inch spars,its quiet,the dising of the dogs is really nice and it runs 3/8 chain,i gotta say its not bad especially for $200Yeah one of these days I want to go play around for a couple of days with the local harvesters and see what's what on the big saws. I've always been a stihl guy but if the big husky saws really are better I'm willing to have my mind changed.
Hell I run a 28" on my lowly little bone stock 59cc 562XP and it sings like bird. Will a 59cc 362 do a good job of pulling a 28"? Maybe someone can answer this question. Stihl's are obviously beautifully built saws and I would love to love them, but in my experience they have not been able to do what I need them to do nearly as well as a Husky.
I defy anyone to find a better cutting, better pulling stock 50cc saw than a 550XP MK2? The 261 certainly aint it.
I've even run a (gasp) 32" .050 lightweight bar on my little 562XP and it just buzzed along - in softwood mind, but it got me quick, nice clean felling jobs with no fuss. Wouldn't do it all the time but in a pinch it came thru.Hell I run a 28" on my lowly little bone stock 59cc 562XP and it sings like bird. Will a 59cc 362 do a good job of pulling a 28"? Maybe someone can answer this question. Stihl's are obviously beautifully built saws and I would love to love them, but in my experience they have not been able to do what I need them to do nearly as well as a Husky.
I’ve slapped a 28” on my 361 more than once. I was actually quite impressed with it, but not as impressed as I was with the 20” from my 361 on the 440.
I do get your point, and agree. I’d likely go with a 395 over a 661 IF I can find a good shop within a hour from me.
I wouldn’t trade the bar & Clutch cover off my 261 ver II for a 550.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Then you my friend are in need of a financial advisor....not advice on Stihl vs Husqy