- Location
- Retired in Minneapolis
I think safety is perceived far too cliche, for each given situation.
Expand on how safety is a cliche. Take as much space as you need to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think safety is perceived far too cliche, for each given situation.
Thanks. Lol, I don't know if I could use much space to expand on how cliche, safety is perceived. But, I'll try.Expand on how safety is a cliche. Take as much space as you need to.
Thanks. Lol, I don't know if I could use much space to expand on how cliche, safety is perceived. But, I'll try.
I just see, some think as long as you have a hard hat on you're inherently safer, in one way, yes, that's true.
But, it can make one, more likely to be unaware of sights or sounds that could precede a greater danger than what a hard hat can protect from.
Also, I see so many construction workers wearing hard hats in an environment where it is not necessary, and the non-necessity of it, could cause immunity or "a subtle, sub conscience, learned lack of consequence", to its time and place of necessity. Which translates into other aspects and realms of safety elsewhere.
There is much truth to the old saying, "by beholding one becomes" If people thought of safety with more of a critical mindset, I think it would command more of an awareness that lacks in many people I've seen, in relation to being aware of danger before it occurs.
I think there was a cliche response, to me having my trusted worker move me about, to dismantle two smaller trees.
In that it could be safe (enough) and efficient to have an adequate worker, operate the lift in a place/setting where he can safely see where to put the cutter, where he needs to be.
Now obviously, if the "trusted" worker is not adequate enough to know when to use the turtle setting, and know when he can't see good enough to continue operation, then yes, that would be not safe.
Thanks. Lol, I don't know if I could use much space to expand on how cliche, safety is perceived. But, I'll try.
I just see, some think as long as you have a hard hat on you're inherently safer, in one way, yes, that's true.
But, it can make one, more likely to be unaware of sights or sounds that could precede a greater danger than what a hard hat can protect from.
Also, I see so many construction workers wearing hard hats in an environment where it is not necessary, and the non-necessity of it, could cause immunity or "a subtle, sub conscience, learned lack of consequence", to its time and place of necessity. Which translates into other aspects and realms of safety elsewhere.
There is much truth to the old saying, "by beholding one becomes" If people thought of safety with more of a critical mindset, I think it would command more of an awareness that lacks in many people I've seen, in relation to being aware of danger before it occurs.
In this case, I could get behind mute.Moot is the word not mute.
Unless you have a grapple truck with a debris body with which you just stuff the box. Just saying.I have to be honest, anyone throwing material into one big messy pile is not concerned about efficiency. There is nothing efficient about wrestling tangled branches that haven’t been staged properly.
I see, where you're coming from. Expense shouldn't impose on one's likelyhood in prevention of injury, I want others/myself to have the most adequate helmet money can buy.The idea behind safety first, and safety when it doesnt seem necessary is because safety is most effective if it becomes a habit. I see your point. However, if you only wore your helmet when you thought you might need it, what happens when that one time you should have had it on but didnt?
I bucked the safety thing for years. I fought against it because of lack of productivity, chaps were hot, safety glasses got fogged up, etc. But when I realized that I only have 1 body to preserve with all of its faculties, I have a family that needs me, I have employees that have families that needs them, and we need to be able to work into retirement, I realized the short-term inconveniences are very small indeed.
One other thing...if safety is uncomfortable, spend whatever you need to make it work. Many times, just like the hard hat issue you mentioned, if you spend more on a hard hat it will fit better and be more comfortable.
Just my 2 cents.
Always engage it’s all love I bet even from the dudes who disagreedIn the future, I shouldn't posts such threads. Honestly, I didn't know I'd get such a rejective response.
I only posted it, in sheer excitement of thinking others may have done similar, and found it interestingly productive.
You know when one immediately agrees with another, out of almost like a camaraderical experience, they had in the past.
Like an instant, fond piece of music to ones ears/mind.
I see most on here think similarly, and maybe I should take a break from engaging on this forum.
Always engage it’s all love I bet even from the dudesIn the future, I shouldn't posts such threads. Honestly, I didn't know I'd get such a rejective response.
I only posted it, in sheer excitement of thinking others may have done similar, and found it interestingly productive.
You know when one immediately agrees with another, out of almost like a camaraderical experience, they had in the past.
Like an instant, fond piece of music to ones ears/mind.
I see most on here think similarly, and maybe I should take a break from engaging on this forum.
You got snow? All we have here is ice, and not quite enough ice to to make trees fall down, just enough ice to make things look pretty.We are plowing snow in the northeast today and I thought of this thread.
If you were plowing snow would you have your passenger work the remote due to hand fatigue. I'm half making light of this topic. I hope to not piss anyone off.
It made me laugh when this thought came to mind. Btw I have no lift or bucket experience. Only flew a bucket twice. I know nothing.
It's all a learning experience man. I've been following this thread along and here are some of my thoughtsIn the future, I shouldn't posts such threads. Honestly, I didn't know I'd get such a rejective response.
I only posted it, in sheer excitement of thinking others may have done similar, and found it interestingly productive.
You know when one immediately agrees with another, out of almost like a camaraderical experience, they had in the past.
Like an instant, fond piece of music to ones ears/mind.
I see most on here think similarly, and maybe I should take a break from engaging on this forum.
I see where you’re coming from.It's all a learning experience man. I've been following this thread along and here are some of my thoughts
I've run a bucket for 10+ years ( I also climb a ton but regularly fly the bucket) and can safely say that I would never, ever ever let someone else run the controls. Once you become a proficient operator in a lift it's very fast. I can see if you haven't run a lift much where your thought process comes from. I've done plenty of work with a two man crew and I have yet to work in a spot where having the ground man not clear the drop zone of material while working doesn't make sense.
Go get a job with a professional company and work with them for a few years. The knowledge gained will be invaluable for your career.
And wear your PPE, it will save you when you least expect it. Don't argue that it makes you safer- it will save you, and if by some miracle you make it through your entire career without so much as a close call then at least you presented the image of a professional!
Stick around- there is so much information here on the buzz!
It’s all good man. I encourage both humorical and serious inquiry.We are plowing snow in the northeast today and I thought of this thread.
If you were plowing snow would you have your passenger work the remote due to hand fatigue. I'm half making light of this topic. I hope to not piss anyone off.
It made me laugh when this thought came to mind. Btw I have no lift or bucket experience. Only flew a bucket twice. I know nothing.
To compete how two could work together, on a very connected task.