Fu*%face Von Clownstick

My other intent when bringing up the special counsel’s report was simply this:

Keep everything in the report - all the facts, every word- the same EXCEPT swap Biden’s name for Trump. There is a 100% chance the special counsel brings charges. One hundred. We all know it. We all see it. This is how corrupt the game has become. There are two tiers of justice. People will only tolerate it for so long. And they’re right to demand better.


My man… just stop with that word. Please. You use it every time you’re confronted with any pushback that challenges your worldview. Instead of whataboutism just think of it as “evidence to the contrary”. Like if you say the world is flat and I say it’s spherical, is that whataboutism? Nah. Just facts you don’t want to hear.
You speak of “facts” and “evidence to the contrary”, yet your description of the special counsel report was nothing more than a lie.

You complain about the word whataboutism yet is the only tool you use since Biden has become president. I get it my man.. You have no defense for your cult leader, so you simply point to the shiny thing in the corner, and say whatabout Sleepy Joe (Please refer to post #6160 for more whatabout Sleepy Joe nonsense). Pretty pathetic my man.
 
Last edited:
My other intent when bringing up the special counsel’s report was simply this:

Keep everything in the report - all the facts, every word- the same EXCEPT swap Biden’s name for Trump. There is a 100% chance the special counsel brings charges. One hundred. We all know it. We all see it. This is how corrupt the game has become. There are two tiers of justice. People will only tolerate it for so long. And they’re right to demand better.
However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence
does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt


Key phrase. Put any name in place of Biden and the outcome is the same. The two tiers of justice in this country are really between the “rich” and the poor. If you can afford better counsel your odds of a better outcome increases.
 
I just read the special counsel’s report in its entirety and your description of it, as was written here, was as full of shit as the day is long. Life must be mighty interesting when your looking at the world through MAGA tinted glasses. Sorry your going through it buddy. I wouldn’t wish it upon anyone.

And it’s a free country, so you can mention Biden all you want. Didn’t vote for him the first time around, and I won’t the second time around. I can’t remember but I voted for either voted for Merle Haggard or Johnny Paycheck in 2020, and I will probably go with Texas legend Johnny Bush in 2024.



.



.
Excuse me, but choosing a write-in candidate in a race between Biden and trump is almost as dangerous as voting for trump himself. I'm not sure you'll have accomplished anything throughout these years of discussions if your vote for Johnny Bush puts trump back in office.

Every vote FOR Biden will be a vote AGAINST trump. Claiming that Biden is as bad as trump is like saying that autocracy is as good as democracy.
 
Excuse me, but choosing a write-in candidate in a race between Biden and trump is almost as dangerous as voting for trump himself. I'm not sure you'll have accomplished anything throughout these years of discussions if your vote for Johnny Bush puts trump back in office.

Every vote FOR Biden will be a vote AGAINST trump. Claiming that Biden is as bad as trump is like saying that autocracy is as good as democracy.
I live in California, a state Donny ain't winning in 2024. It is also my right to vote for the person of my choosing and since, once again, we have 2 horrible options I am going to exercise that right. If I lived in a state where my vote actually mattered I wouldn't hesitate to vote for Biden, by far the lesser of 2 evils. You can thank the electoral college..
 
Last edited:
I live in California, a state Donny ain't winning in 2024. It is also my right to vote for the person of my choosing and since, once again, we have 2 horrible options I am going to exercise that right. If I lived in a state where my vote actually mattered I wouldn't hesitate to vote for Biden, by far the lesser of 2 evils. You can thank the electoral college..
There's an interstate pact that almost enough states have signed wherein those states have agreed to commit their electoral votes to whoever wins the popular vote. If they can get a couple more states to sign on, then they can effectively render the electoral college useless, regardless of it still technically being a thing. But I'm in the same boat as you, so I will do the same as I have always done, and vot for a third party, because in CA, it's not nearly close enough of a vote to matter. Lots of our trump voters have left the state too, so we got that going for us.
 
Excuse me, but choosing a write-in candidate in a race between Biden and trump is almost as dangerous as voting for trump himself. I'm not sure you'll have accomplished anything throughout these years of discussions if your vote for Johnny Bush puts trump back in office.

Every vote FOR Biden will be a vote AGAINST trump. Claiming that Biden is as bad as trump is like saying that autocracy is as good as democracy.
I don't think that's a reasonable comparison. Biden is has only delivered the status quo that we've grown accustomed to over the last 30 years, which is an ever strengthening oligarchy. He's a wealthy aristocrat, and is just as bad as rump, but in a different way. The American aristocracy is succeeding in an echo of Rome at the height of the "bread and circus" days. My life has not changed much since I was a kid, except when I did things myself to improve my station. I have gotten better tax refunds under biden than I did under trump, but I only started paying taxes in 2017. I have some fairly extreme views, and am as disappointed as the worst among us that these are our options. Don't forget that there are some terrible people for whom trump doesn't go far enough. As a decendant of immigrants from South America, I find it hilarious how many latinos are for trump. He's blowing as much smoke up your asses as any other politician. He clearly just uses enough of the catchphrases that foxnews/oan/alex jones/rush limbaugh fans like to hear, and is willing to say anything to get all the angriest, and most hateful people all riled up to rally to his support. People like the way he talks and don't realize that he's just pulling the less subtle con job, but the fact is that the president doesn't get to have all the aces. I wish things could be fixed by a single well intentioned president, but that's not how it works, and the more time passes, the more I understand why that is how it is. See: this thread.
 
I live in California, a state Donny ain't winning in 2024. It is also my right to vote for the person of my choosing and since, once again, we have 2 horrible options I am going to exercise that right. If I lived in a state where my vote actually mattered I wouldn't hesitate to vote for Biden, by far the lesser of 2 evils. You can thank the electoral college..
When folks make arguments against the Electoral College (EC), they most often point to the fact that candidates can win the election despite losing the popular vote (that's not a state tally, but a federal one).

Just ask Hillary Clinton, who lost after winning the popular vote by 2.9 million. If we want legislators to eradicate the Electoral College, we should continue to point to the discrepancy between the popular vote and EC votes. That sometimes means holding our noses and voting for the "least bad" candidate. Anything else is just a throw-away vote.
 
Last edited:
When folks make arguments against the Electoral College (EC), they most often point to the fact that candidates can win the election despite losing the popular vote (that's not a state tally, but a federal one).

Just ask Hillary Clinton, who lost after winning the popular vote by 2.9 million. If we want legislators to eradicate the Electoral College, we should continue to point to the discrepancy between the popular vote and EC votes. That sometimes means holding our noses and voting for the "least bad" candidate. Anything else is just a throw-away vote.
You're only strengthening the case for us not voting for Biden. If he becomes the first democrat to lose the popular vote, but win the electoral college, I will jump for joy, because then the last few states that need to agree to nullify the EC may sign the deal. I don't see an honest vote for a third party as a throw away. I am voicing my honest opinion rather than cowing to a broken system that's been usurped by the rich. Imagine the message it would send if the majority of votes went to 10 random 3rd party candidates, and biden or rump won with 30% of the votes cast. We would see a whole new crop of people getting in to politics instead of giving up, holding their nose, and letting the circus continue.
 
Last edited:
When folks make arguments against the Electoral College (EC), they most often point to the fact that candidates can win the election despite losing the popular vote (that's not a state tally, but a federal one).

Just ask Hillary Clinton, who lost after winning the popular vote by 2.9 million. If we want legislators to eradicate the Electoral College, we should continue to point to the discrepancy between the popular vote and EC votes. That sometimes means holding our noses and voting for the "least bad" candidate. Anything else is just a throw-away vote.
I get where your coming from, but my vote is a middle finger to the unfair and undemocratic way in which we pick our presidents. Since 2000 a republican candidate has won the popular vote just one time, yet we have had to suffer through 12 years of men like Bush Jr and Trump. 9/11, multiple wars, a crushed economy, Covid, dead bodies piled up in our morgues, insurrection, a full frontal assault on our democracy, and yet another crushed economy. For the last few decades it seems that only thing that Republican presidents are good at is leaving a giant fucking mess for the incoming Democratic president to clean up.
 
Last edited:
You're only strengthening the case for us not voting for Biden. If he becomes the first democrat to lose the popular vote, but win the electoral college, I will jump for joy, because then the last few states that need to agree to nullify the EC may sign the deal. I don't see an honest vote for a third party as a throw away. I am voicing my honest opinion rather than cowing to a broken system that's been usurped by the rich. Imagine the message it would send if the majority of votes went to 10 random 3rd party candidates, and biden or rump won with 30% of the votes cast. We would see a whole new crop of people getting in to politics instead of giving up, holding their nose, and letting the cir us continue.
Yes, and when you find that 3rd-party candidate that has a chance of winning, I agree that you should vote for that person--and I will too.

In this case, you have a clear choice between a Nazi and a Non-Nazi--and voting 3rd-party can only muddy that choice.
 
Yes, and when you find that 3rd-party candidate that has a chance of winning, I agree that you should vote for that person--and I will too.

In this case, you have a clear choice between a Nazi and a Non-Nazi--and voting 3rd-party can only muddy that choice.
If nothing is done to push the conversation further that way, then you're never gonna see a third party candidate for everyone to rally behind. Even Bernie Sanders had to change his party title to gain any traction, and with one of the two parties support, he was a legitimate contender. Letting the blue team fall on their own sword is a legitimate strategy. I encourage everyone to vote for a party who espouses the ideals you'd like to see upheld, even if you don't totally wanna suck their candidates proverbial dick. It's policies that matter, not candidates.The democrats might listen up and offer up a better candidate if it was obvious that they lost our unquestioning support, costing them an election that would be an easy slam dunk with a better candidate offered up. Like, for example, one who didn't assure us that he intended to be a one term president, and then break several campaign promises, before delivering the sad trombone of his re-election bid.
 
Love to hear what cult members have to say about this blatant and obvious grift. I imagine we’re all gonna have to wait at least a year or more to see @Bucknut running around in his new gaudy and garish gold kicks. Hell, for all we know Donny just defrauded his cult members out of $400? Wouldn’t surprise me in the least bit.

 
Last edited:
I wonder how many Trump University victims bought these sneakers? Probably not enough to recoup the $25,000,000 he lost when he, the man who said “I never settle a case”, did just that. Old Bone Spurs would make PT fucking Barnum blush.
 
MAGA and the GOP's vision for America is one in which a woman has no autonomy over her own body, and citizens don’t have the right to choose their own hair style. Just the tip of the iceberg folks. So much for freedom and personal choice..

 
Last edited:
…and citizens don’t have the right to choose their own hair style. So much for freedom and personal choice..
Weird. I thought the left were the ones telling (mostly white) people which hairstyles they could and couldn’t wear:
IMG_2401.png
As for this kid, it’s simple: follow the rules or stay home. Schools are not places for unfettered free expression. Administration has every right to establish policies regarding dress code or expression which they will not tolerate. They have broad discretion, too. Basically if they think anything is a distraction to the learning environment they can ban it. “Legitimate pedagogical concerns” is the operative term here.

Do I think this is a stupid rule? Yes. Is his hairstyle hurting anyone in my opinion? No. But rules are rules so the kid has some options:
1. Cut hair
2. Move
3. Keep hair, stay home, challenge law
4. Fight locally to change school board

Option 3 is proceeding non-optimally so I’d recommend options 1 or 4, maybe both. Failing that, if the parents value hair/stubbornness more than their kid’s education then option 2 is always a fallback.

Summary: stupid rule. Even stupider to cost your son a year of education to fight it.
 
In the words of one of the best wordsmiths, George Carlin:

Don't despair, its only hair

If issues like this, which likely is covered by Free Speech, were fought for as hard as 2A issues we might get onto more important things for society.

When I was in 8th grade, circa 1969,the long haired radicals on student council in the senior high protested Blue Jean day. Cops were called, arrests were made, the dress code was changed. Guys could wear blue jeans and tshirts,girls could wear slacks.

Yeah, 1969!


Come on...there are bigger distractions and limitations to the curriculum these days than hair.
 

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom