Thank You for the explanation
www.healthline.com
Who asked anyone to panic?
There is a 28 page thread at the treehouse on Ivermectin vs vaxxines...
culturalhusbandry.substack.com
childrenshealthdefense.org
www.thegatewaypundit.com
rumble.com
nypost.com
There isn't much in that regard Tom. The vast majority of published studies and more importantly the met-analysis all show ivermectin to be extremely effective, especially if given early.
journals.lww.com
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
covid19criticalcare.com
What exactly is your point? Ivermectin has been public domain for 25 years. No big Pharma owns the patent anymore. Anyone can make it, and they do. $1.50 per dose means no major news outlets sponsored by Big Pharma for Ivermectin.
Why do you put faith in the FLCCC?This is probably the best resource page for information that supports the use of Ivermectin
Ivermectin
Like penicillin and aspirin, ivermectin is a medication that derives from nature. Although it was little known in advanced health economies before COVID, the drug has an incredible history of promoting health in underdeveloped countries. Approved for human use in 1987, it has been instrumental...
There isn't much in that regard Tom. The vast majority of published studies and more importantly the met-analysis all show ivermectin to be extremely effective, especially if given early.
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics
mortality, in secondary outcomes, and in chemoprophylaxis, among people with, or at high risk of, COVID-19 infection. Data sources: We searched bibliographic databases up to April 25, 2021. Two review authors sifted for studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were...Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
There are also plenty of shenanigans that don't pass the sniff test around the suppression of ivermectin and other cheap and effective treatments. Take for example the English meta-analysis by Andrew Hill:
Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Ivermectin to Treat SARS-CoV-2 Infection - PubMed
Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug being investigated for repurposing against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ivermectin showed in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2, but only at high concentrations. This meta-analysis investigated ivermectin in 23 randomized...
Hill claims that his conclusion was replaced by his superiors. Dr Kory and others claim that the replaced conclusion is a misrepresentation of the results/data.
Then you have a lot of frontline doctors that say ivermectin saves lives. They are the ones treating these patients and have seen the results with their own eyes. There are a lot of them and they are taking to social media to protest the policies that are costing lives (some say as much as 85% of deaths in the US could have been prevented). If you doubt that number ask yourself why the US has the HIGHEST death rate per capita in the world.
And then there are the atempts to prevent the use of ivermectin by doctors, which makes no sense given it has a 40 year history of safe use. And the facts that the 6 poorest countries in Africa that happen to use ivermectin as a weekly preventative of parasites also have the lowest death rate in the world from covid. You stand 22x the chance of dying from covid in the US as you do in countries. It goes on and on.
You can certainly follow the money. My MD happens to be my best friend from HS. He offered to prescribe monoclonal antibodies, claiming they would reduce the chances of me going to the hospital, while he refused to write a script for ivermectin. The monoclonal antibodies cost upwards of 4-5,000 while the ivermectin costs $25. I declined the antibodies and took the horse paste which cost around $12.
Once again someone is linking pro ivermectin met-analysis that is citing deeply flawed sources-There isn't much in that regard Tom. The vast majority of published studies and more importantly the met-analysis all show ivermectin to be extremely effective, especially if given early.
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19... : American Journal of Therapeutics
mortality, in secondary outcomes, and in chemoprophylaxis, among people with, or at high risk of, COVID-19 infection. Data sources: We searched bibliographic databases up to April 25, 2021. Two review authors sifted for studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were...Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
There are also plenty of shenanigans that don't pass the sniff test around the suppression of ivermectin and other cheap and effective treatments. Take for example the English meta-analysis by Andrew Hill:
Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Ivermectin to Treat SARS-CoV-2 Infection - PubMed
Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug being investigated for repurposing against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ivermectin showed in vitro activity against SARS-COV-2, but only at high concentrations. This meta-analysis investigated ivermectin in 23 randomized...
Hill claims that his conclusion was replaced by his superiors. Dr Kory and others claim that the replaced conclusion is a misrepresentation of the results/data.
Then you have a lot of frontline doctors that say ivermectin saves lives. They are the ones treating these patients and have seen the results with their own eyes. There are a lot of them and they are taking to social media to protest the policies that are costing lives (some say as much as 85% of deaths in the US could have been prevented). If you doubt that number ask yourself why the US has the HIGHEST death rate per capita in the world.
And then there are the atempts to prevent the use of ivermectin by doctors, which makes no sense given it has a 40 year history of safe use. And the facts that the 6 poorest countries in Africa that happen to use ivermectin as a weekly preventative of parasites also have the lowest death rate in the world from covid. You stand 22x the chance of dying from covid in the US as you do in those 6 countries. It goes on and on.
You can certainly follow the money. My MD happens to be my best friend from HS. He offered to prescribe monoclonal antibodies, claiming they would reduce the chances of me going to the hospital, while he refused to write a script for ivermectin. The monoclonal antibodies cost upwards of 4-5,000 while the ivermectin costs $25. I declined the antibodies and took the horse paste which cost around $12.
I got a teaspoon
Well, on the bright side, I am now dating a covid widow. She lost her husband September of 2020 and left behind four kids as well as his wife.
what makes you trust that anymore than you trusted the science when the experts said two weeks to flatten the curve or there is no way this could have come fromm a lab. two retracted articles from the Lancet later and as clear a trail to follow the money as there has ever been.
