Climbing on the wild side!

That big yellow thing is a ballon ride that goes up 500ft it over looks the entire park , it's a good birds eye view from up there.. For the deer it's a BIG problem out here they just tear up all the landscape and kill most of our small trees... Since we are big in conservation and projects worldwide of endangered species and we deal w/ fish n game and other group that i can't mention , but we are planning on removing all these brown deers out of our plant collections..
 

Attachments

  • 49093-PICT0020.webp
    49093-PICT0020.webp
    358.7 KB · Views: 84
We had to put a cap cover over this big yellow ball to keep it from getting to much sun... /forum/images/graemlins/coolsun.gif
 

Attachments

  • 49100-PICT0004.webp
    49100-PICT0004.webp
    169.7 KB · Views: 78
JF,

You have some great pictures...I loved the one of the gorilla contemplating the hot wires.

Thanks for sharing...I would love to see more as you have time.
 
Yeah, the pictures are great; except for the aspect of their dimensions and byte count (which are directly related).

49106-PICT0020.JPG JPEG 1600x1200 447KB

If your monitor is displaying 1600 pixels wide and 1200 pixels tall and you're viewing the image full size then you know what it is you're uploading here. If you're not viewing it that size (certainly not necessary!) then why don't you shrink them to the size you view them at before uploading them. I mean, sure, we can all shrink them down to view them so no parts are off the screen or out of the window (either of which makes us have to scroll them to see all the parts, but never all together at once). But then why deal with all the data that way if our viewer either automatically or manually has to shrink them after they arrive?

I suspect that you're not viewing them at their full size and that you don't realize you're sending so much data. [that 447KB image takes a 56k modem connection almost a full two minutes to fetch]

Please try to get them down to 800x600 or so.

Thanks,
Glen
 
I don't mean to tangent the thread, but for goodness sakes Glens, would you please stop complaining about picture size? I realize you have dial up and feel slighted by that, but it's getting repetitive and somewhat annoying. I don't know the numbers on what type of connection buzzers have, but it does appear that broadband users are by and far the majority. The internet is no longer designed for dial up, and has not been for quite some time. I can understand your frustrations about this, but it's getting old.


I for one like the larger pictures. I run two monitors on this machine, one of them at 1600x1200, the other at 1440x900, and I absolutely love it when a picture takes up a whole monitor. My personal photo hatred are snapshots, those little pics that I have to enlarge if I want to see anything. I consider 800x600 to be a minimum, rather than a maximum.

Dial up users always remind me of vegitarians I knew in college. They thought their way was the only right way, and got offended if I ate meat or animal products in their presence.

Sorry for the tangent,

Sumo
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't mean to tangent the thread, but for goodness sakes Glens, would you please stop complaining about picture size? I realize you have dial up and feel slighted by that, but it's getting repetitive and somewhat annoying. I don't know the numbers on what type of connection buzzers have, but it does appear that broadband users are by and far the majority. The internet is no longer designed for dial up, and has not been for quite some time. I can understand your frustrations about this, but it's getting old.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is his lot in life, it appears. He won't even go to my forum because it is too "image intensive." Lordy, everybody else is happy and ain't complaining.

"Image intensive" is what makes a forum interesting!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom