[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Im with dave on this one as far as lifting the climber out side the tree it is much safer.
[/ QUOTE ]
rob, the real issue i have is the new ANSI regs require the climber to have 2 attachment points during any climber hoisting. If the climber is flying though the air nowhere near there tree i can see the safety advantage to this. If the ball has been lowered through the tree or if the climber is being picked up inside of the tree and then being hoisted through the tree with their climbing line and presumably a buck strap attached to the ball, hook, load line, i see and increased risk of injury from the climber getting stuck on something, since the climber no longer has the ability to grab their friction hitch and rappel to avoid being torn in half, since the climber no longer has the ability to grab their friction hitch and rappel to avoid being torn in half
[/ QUOTE ]
That is a very good point
[ QUOTE ]
Im with dave on this one as far as lifting the climber out side the tree it is much safer.
[/ QUOTE ]
rob, the real issue i have is the new ANSI regs require the climber to have 2 attachment points during any climber hoisting. If the climber is flying though the air nowhere near there tree i can see the safety advantage to this. If the ball has been lowered through the tree or if the climber is being picked up inside of the tree and then being hoisted through the tree with their climbing line and presumably a buck strap attached to the ball, hook, load line, i see and increased risk of injury from the climber getting stuck on something, since the climber no longer has the ability to grab their friction hitch and rappel to avoid being torn in half, since the climber no longer has the ability to grab their friction hitch and rappel to avoid being torn in half
[/ QUOTE ]
That is a very good point