Fu*%face Von Clownstick

I dont wish to return to the abortion conversation, I believe we buried that. Was just pointing out the inconsistency in your opinions.
I agree best not to drag that all up again.

I maintain I'm being pretty consistent...protect the children and the innocent in and out of the womb from being killed, maimed, or wrongly influenced into life altering physical actions via our schools, social media, doctors that just want the money, society and businesses pushing it
 
I agree best not to drag that all up again.

I maintain I'm being pretty consistent...protect the children and the innocent in and out of the womb from being killed, maimed, or wrongly influenced into life altering physical actions via our schools, social media, doctors that just want the money, society and businesses pushing it
I am not talking about the child aspect here. I highlighted your comment specifically about adults doing what they want and not asking you to participate. You are over complicatimng my point. Let adults do what they want. Preganent women over 18 are adults. Regardless of what your opinion on their actions, no matter how much you think it is your business, stop your participating in their lives. Just as you request that others dont ask you to participate in theirs. Forced particiaption you want it or you dont? Surely you can see the contradiction.
 
I am not talking about the child aspect here. I highlighted your comment specifically about adults doing what they want and not asking you to participate. You are over complicatimng my point. Let adults do what they want. Preganent women over 18 are adults. Regardless of what your opinion on their actions, no matter how much you think it is your business, stop your participating in their lives. Just as you request that others dont ask you to participate in theirs. Forced particiaption you want it or you dont? Surely you can see the contradiction.
But you are completely missing one aspect, the child/baby in the womb. I agree let the adult do and live how they want, as long as they are not directly effecting or influencing a child/baby. Or asking me to affirm/support their biological and genetic lie.

I see no difference in or out of the womb...you do. That is where we disagree.
 
WAIT UP

I want everyone to lift their fingers from the keyboard and read. If you're writing about anything abortion related please think hard about including it. This isn't editorial.

The topic always snowballs and becomes a distraction.
Sorry, wasn't trying to redebate the abortion issue. I could substitute gay marriage for abortion and make the same point. I was just pointing out contradictions. Point taken, I will move on.
 
This topic always snowballs and becomes a distraction.
I would argue that the phoney left/right paradigm that so many have bought into is the real distraction. The tribalism and ideological conformity of the so-called "left" vs. the so-called "right" is both fascinating and horrifying. The absolute hatred and vitriol that one half of the US seems to have for the other half is sad. I'm not that old, but I'm old enough to remember when people had actual optimism about the future. Before everyone and their brother started looking to the government to solve all their problems.
 
There's loonies everywhere.

Easy to provide examples too. That's what was requested. Otherwise your comments sound loonie.
Loonie is putting it politely.. transphobe bigotry is more adept.
‘Gender dysphoria’ is a shitty word for a diagnosis but it’s very real.
But I can agree that both sides of the two party system are pretty whack.. this is coming from the other box
 
Last edited:
So you are not opposed to gay marriage then...
Do I think it is a sin? Yes, so in that way I'm opposed to it. No different then any other sin one would do constantly and willingly. But if they want to live that way, that is on them. Doesn’t mean I won't speak out about the sin, as I would to a drug addict , murderer, adultery, etc.

I would prefer not to have it called marriage too, since traditionally speaking that is a covenant between the individuals and God. As far as the state/government is concerned I have no real issues with them having the same spousal benefits.

But samething as I said before, don't force it on me. If I owned a cake shop, I shouldnt have to make a wedding cake for them. Just go to the next cake shop. I don't want to put my brand and artistic ability into something I don't agree with.

I've had clients that were gay, and was somewhat friends with them. I had no problem doing their trees. But I personally see a moral difference in making a wedding cake for them.
 
Last thought on this. On the subject of sharing bathrooms, and kids.
As a father with a daughter I have brought her into MANY bathrooms. With both kids I had no issue with walking into the women’s bathroom to find a changing table, as my second my daughter grew I now have no qualms with walking her to either bathroom so she can do her business, get her butt wiped, not fall in, wash her hands and get out.
We all shit, this society needs to grow the fuck up
 
Do I think it is a sin? Yes, so in that way I'm opposed to it. No different then any other sin one would do constantly and willingly. But if they want to live that way, that is on them. Doesn’t mean I won't speak out about the sin, as I would to a drug addict , murderer, adultery, etc.

I would prefer not to have it called marriage too, since traditionally speaking that is a covenant between the individuals and God. As far as the state/government is concerned I have no real issues with them having the same spousal benefits.

But samething as I said before, don't force it on me. If I owned a cake shop, I shouldnt have to make a wedding cake for them. Just go to the next cake shop. I don't want to put my brand and artistic ability into something I don't agree with.

I've had clients that were gay, and was somewhat friends with them. I had no problem doing their trees. But I personally see a moral difference in making a wedding cake for them.
Lets can the verbal gymnastics. Direct question, would you vote for legisaltion givng gay people the right get married? Go ahead and insert civil union for marriage here to simplify it for you.
 
Lets can the verbal gymnastics. Direct question, would you vote for legisaltion givng gay people the right get married? Go ahead and insert civil union for marriage here to simplify it for you.
Would I vote for it no, because that is asking me to participate and affirm it...like making a wedding cake for them. I feel that is quite obvious because I said I shouldn't be force to do a cake, said it was a sin, etc.

Would you vote for something you feel is wrong? Maybe like constitution carry laws or anti (what tom says we can't talk about)? Of course you wouldn't...so y should I vote for something I'm against personally?

I possibly may choose not to vote for or against, but I certainly wouldn't vote for it.
 
Do I think it is a sin? Yes, so in that way I'm opposed to it. No different then any other sin one would do constantly and willingly. But if they want to live that way, that is on them. Doesn’t mean I won't speak out about the sin, as I would to a drug addict , murderer, adultery, etc.

I would prefer not to have it called marriage too, since traditionally speaking that is a covenant between the individuals and God. As far as the state/government is concerned I have no real issues with them having the same spousal benefits.

But samething as I said before, don't force it on me. If I owned a cake shop, I shouldnt have to make a wedding cake for them. Just go to the next cake shop. I don't want to put my brand and artistic ability into something I don't agree with.

I've had clients that were gay, and was somewhat friends with them. I had no problem doing their trees. But I personally see a moral difference in making a wedding cake for them.
"Somewhat friends" is disingenuous, dishonest and phony. What is that? Disdain with a thin veneer of fake friendliness to facilitate the making of money. How would making a cake for someone be forcing anything on you any more than doing their tree work? I am guessing because it involves marriage. What if this gay couple said they wanted their trees pruned because they were having the wedding there and getting married under the trees you pruned? How about making a birthday cake for a gay person? Refusing service to someone on these grounds is discrimination plain and simple. Just because you attach " religious liberties " to it doesnt give a pass to violate the law. What is religious liberties anyway? Seems like its being used as a pass to do things that are not lawful or not decent. What would Jesus do? would he resfuse service to someone because they were sinners? Didnt he wash the feet of a sinner. For that matter how do you provide service to anyone after all everyone is a sinner in your view.
 
No they have not changed biologically or genetically. All they have changed is their appearance. They are still xx or xy. They still can't produce a baby with the the opposite's sex organs.
They have changed biologically. They have all the proper parts you consider male and female parts.
The fact they can't produce babies has no bearing. I can't have children. Does that make me a non-male?
 
Would I vote for it no, because that is asking me to participate and affirm it...like making a wedding cake for them. I feel that is quite obvious because I said I shouldn't be force to do a cake, said it was a sin, etc.

Would you vote for something you feel is wrong? Maybe like constitution carry laws or anti (what tom says we can't talk about)? Of course you wouldn't...so y should I vote for something I'm against personally?

I possibly may choose not to vote for or against, but I certainly wouldn't vote for it.
I appreciate your direct anwser. I am ok with being in disagreement. I choose to not worry what other people do. I focus on being the best person I can be and treating people right and taking care of my family. I think we may have some common ground there. Just a different approach.
 
Getting back to the topic of this thread...

In a legal filing made late Friday, attorneys working for special counsel Jack Smith notified the court that information they will be handing over to Donald Trump's attorneys as part of the discovery process will contain some information on "ongoing investigations" that could lead to new charges.

According to a report from Alan Feuer of the New York Times, those documents also contain information about "uncharged individuals.”

Now that the former president has been arraigned in a Florida courtroom on 37 federal counts that include alleged violations of the Espionage Actviolations of the Espionage Act, prosecutors are pressing forward with normal court procedures and the notice given on Friday puts Trump's lawyers on notice that there is likely more to come.
 
Would I vote for it no, because that is asking me to participate and affirm it...like making a wedding cake for them. I feel that is quite obvious because I said I shouldn't be force to do a cake, said it was a sin, etc.

Would you vote for something you feel is wrong? Maybe like constitution carry laws or anti (what tom says we can't talk about)? Of course you wouldn't...so y should I vote for something I'm against personally?

I possibly may choose not to vote for or against, but I certainly wouldn't vote for it.
And there it is. THE JUDGMENT! Forget life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Equal protections? Please. That stuff only applies to us gawd fearing heterosexual folks. A truly despicable stance which is as unAmerican as it gets, and very reminiscent of blacks not being allowed to vote, sit next to you at restaurant, or sip water from the same fountain.
 
Last edited:
And there it is. THE JUDGMENT! Forget life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Equal protections? Please. That stuff only applies to us gawd fearing heterosexual folks. Very reminiscent of blacks not being allowed to vote, sit next to you at restaurant, or sip water from the same fountain. A fucking despicable stance which is as unAmerican as it gets.
Um...voting for or not voting for issues you care about is the most American thing. To label someone 'un-American' because they have a differing belief system is about as un-American as it gets. But it's pretty standard fare these days.

Democracy (what's left of it) isn't everyone must agree with your world view. Thankfully.
 
Would I vote for it no, because that is asking me to participate and affirm it...like making a wedding cake for them. I feel that is quite obvious because I said I shouldn't be force to do a cake, said it was a sin, etc.

Would you vote for something you feel is wrong? Maybe like constitution carry laws or anti (what tom says we can't talk about)? Of course you wouldn't...so y should I vote for something I'm against personally?

I possibly may choose not to vote for or against, but I certainly wouldn't vote for it.
Would I vote for a law that allows peolple to burn the flag and kneel for the national anthem, yes. Would I personally ingage in this behavior, as a veteran most definately not. Freedom doesnt mean I must agree on like it. What these people are doing doesnt effect you but only in your mind.
 

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom