- Location
- Retired in Minneapolis
It’s pretty awesome talking about trees and tools with y’all!
This is in Awakenings, the place where this discussion should take place. Plenty of other rooms on treebuzz for tree n t ool talk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s pretty awesome talking about trees and tools with y’all!
Napa here for me, the sawshop is hit or miss, but I’ve seen one mask on one employee once at napa. That and typically get a ear full of right wing politics
We are all so naive until we wake up... I wouldn't want to spoil your innocence. You're better off not knowing how much evil is in this worldDevil's advocate, Daniel, in a friendly way, why would so many researchers including those at big pharma work so long and hard for (about 6 vaccines around the world?) if they could have just sold boat loads of the existing medicine, a good extra 6 months on the market with no development upfront layout? Hundreds of thousands more lives saved. Unless perhaps it wasn't shown to be effective. Don't recall the jury ever coming in conclusively on that one, but do recall bogus stuff like Rico points out.
Call that the blade of grass in the mouth creek side analysis, without delving into tech details. I've been escaping to watching Andy Griffith, can you tell?![]()
I don't know your intent, but to me, that comes across as quite condescending. I find discussions are more productive when you attack the issues, not the person. You can attack someone's beliefs or opinions without attacking them. I made a point of not trying to refute what you posted, but rather express the impression it gave me.We are all so naive until we wake up... I wouldn't want to spoil your innocence. You're better off not knowing how much evil is in this world
A former editor of the BMJ or NEJM (one of the most prestigious medical journals) said that a full half of all the published science is completely false. Now if you had to bet, would you bet that ist was the half that was making big pharma big money?Aren’t you the fella who claimed he had read the previously linked article which supports the idea of using Ivermectin against covid?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203399/
You remember. The one which cites flawed, faulty, and fraudulent data and sources. Maybe you were just off your game that day?
I cant answer your question about big pharma Daniel, but I do know that one of the largest studies that the Pro Ivermectin crowd cites to support their stance is pure unadulterated bullshit.A former editor of the BMJ or NEJM (one of the most prestigious medical journals) said that a full half of all the published science is completely false. Now if you had to bet, would you bet that ist was the half that was making big pharma big money?
Are you perhaps referring to John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford?A former editor of the BMJ or NEJM (one of the most prestigious medical journals) said that a full half of all the published science is completely false. Now if you had to bet, would you bet that ist was the half that was making big pharma big money?
and willful ignorance is in its entirely own classThere is a difference between idiocy and ignorance.
There is a difference between concern about another person and being an abrasive ass.
Truth indeedAlright tree family, words to live byView attachment 79677View attachment 79678