[ QUOTE ]
I'll bet that because of static charges more fuzz collects on the Uni than on ropes.
[/ QUOTE ]
Hmmm... I'm thinking not, The first time I ran a Unicender on my 2 year-old Tachyon it cleaned the fuzz off the full length of the rope. My hitches aren't doing that. The wear/friction edges on the Uni are pretty narrow radius, compared to a hitch it's no contest. Obviously a Uni is much more versatile than a hitch. No free lunch, there's always trade-offs.
I agree with Nick to a degree, if you have to add more friction/additional devices to the Uni what's the point? Climbers are making it work with added stuff but it's just more junk on the rope, more complexity, definitely want to be going the the other direction.
Uni is what it is. Would be nice to see the wear surfaces have a more open radius to make it easier on the rope. Of course that would mean more Uni wear which brings back the idea of using a harder metal inset at the wear surfaces (wasn't that the original Uni design?). More expensive to make but perhaps a better Uni.
-AJ