Treesitter Injured

Freshwater, CA - Life has been quiet around the treesits here over the last few months (minus the incessant logging, of course). That ended today, when representatives from Pacific Lumber paid visits to at least two of the treesits in Freshwater. No trespassing signs were nailed up, along with signs reading (ironically enough) “Keep California Green.” Spray paint was used to mark the trees occupied by treesitters, as well as every tree and stump leading to those trees.

At the treesit called Presidia, the words “Gass [sic] here” were painted on the tree with an arrow pointing up. The words “night ops” (as in “nighttime operations) were also tagged. Treesitters were enjoying the view from the top of the tree when they heard hammering as the signs were nailed around the area. Attempts to communicate with the man wielding the hammer were unsuccessful. Shortly after they left, a young woman treesitter began rappelling down the climbing rope. She realized too late that the Pacific Lumber employee had cut her rope when she slid off the end, falling fifteen feet to the ground. No serious injuries were sustained though she will be sore and bruised in the coming days.

This is not the first time Pacific Lumber has risked the safety of non-violent activists in the woods. In March 2003, a PL security guard cut the end of a rope as a treesitter was coming down, cutting the treesitter in the process. In 1998, activist David “Gypsy” Chain was killed by a tree Pacific Lumber fell in his direction. Activists routinely have gear stolen and safety precautions tampered with by Pacific Lumber employees. There is no deterrent for the company, or its parent corporation, Maxxam, as they are not held accountable for their actions, whether for violations to water quality laws, endangered species protections, or the violent handling of treesitters.
 
If Not Now, When?

Published in "The Ecologist"

February 2004






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



If not now, when?

The treesitters versus the logging companies is a battle of some of the world’s most determined activists against some of the world’s most ruthless corporations. It’s also a battle that we cannot afford to lose.

By Derrick Jensen and Remedy



Phoenix is screaming. He hangs by one leg a hundred and sixty feet above the forest floor. The man holding onto this leg says he’s dangling him there in order to make him safe.



Eric Schatz, of Schatz Tree Service — whose ad in the yellow pages declares, [itals]Yes, we even rescue cats[itals] — is at work for Maxxam Corporation/Pacific Lumber, evicting tree-sitters from old growth redwoods PL plans to cut. His two assistants, Jerry and the appropriately-named Ox, pull Phoenix’s legs back onto the plywood platform that has served as home to several tree-sitters these last four months, but they leave his torso hanging, bent at an unnatural angle. Ox pushes down on his chest, bending him further. Phoenix continues to scream.



Minutes pass. Finally, in a message sent not only to Phoenix but to all of us standing below, Phoenix is pulled halfway onto the platform and a rope is put around the back of his neck. Ox uses the rope to bring Phoenix’s face close to his. No one on the ground knows what, if anything, is said. Soon after, with Phoenix’s head and back still over the plywood edge, Ox climbs atop him to stand with both feet on Phoenix’s chest, then puts one foot firmly on his neck.



The climbers bind Phoenix with ropes and lower him to the ground, where he’s promptly arrested. Soon they go to work on Jungle, another treesitter, also one hundred and sixty feet above the ground, who has locked his arms into the metal sleeves of a ‘lockbox’ (a device activists use to voluntarily lock themselves to something where only they can free themselves) around an outstretched branch of this ancient tree.



Jerry hauls up a generator and grinder, then sits for a smoke. Ox drops a potato chip in his mouth, then still chewing steps forward to kick Jungle in the ribs. Ox kicks him again, then ties a rope around each of Jungle’s legs so he can stand on it to cut off the treesitter’s circulation.



This is how they pass their break.



Break finished, the climbers begin to cut away the lockbox. Jungle’s screams can be heard over the whining of metal on metal. Ox takes his foot off the rope, and pulls it up, leaving Jungle’s full weight to hang from chains around his wrists. He screams louder.



The lockbox severed, Jungle is lowered and arrested. Minutes later, another ancient redwood hits the ground. It shatters on impact: the tree stood on a steep slope, and it fell to the downward side. This happens a lot - the company has killed the tree and tortured the treesitters for no financial gain.



This is what it’s like on the front lines of the fight to save the last of this continent’s ancient forests. Welcome to the world of treesitting.



A short history of treesitting
The first treesit in defense of forests in the Western United States occurred in 1985, when Oregon’s Cathedral Forest was being cut by Williamette Industries. Mike Jakubal, a rock climber, modified his gear to ascend old-growth Douglas-Fir trees in an attempt to stop this destruction. It didn’t take loggers long to figure out how to deal with this new situation. From 80 feet above the ground, Jakubal watched as trees as close as 20 feet from his platform were cut. By day’s end, every surrounding tree had been cut. He rappelled down to this suddenly devastated landscape, where for millions of years stood a diverse and thriving forest ecosystem. While sitting on a stump amidst the wreckage, Jakubal was knocked to the ground and arrested by a Forest Service law enforcement officer.



Undaunted by this initial failure to halt deforestation, activists began using this tactic more and more often, refining it as they went. In 1987, Randy Prince conducted the first long-term tree-sit in the Lazy Bluff Timber Sale in Oregon’s North Kalmiopsis roadless area. On the 42nd day, a logger cut one-third of the way through the tree he was in before being talked into turning off his chainsaw. The tree-sit ended that day as the tree was significantly weakened by the cut.



1987 was also the first year tree-sits were used in the ancient redwoods of California. In the early stages of the struggle to save Headwaters Forest, three tree-sitters were perched 130 feet above the forest floor, but were forced down when PL loggers and security agents used slingshots to pelt them with rocks.



Treesits continue to take place across the country, as hundreds of mainly young people take to the trees to try to protect the places they love. In opposition to portrayals in the corporate media, these treesits often take place with extensive community support. For example, in one group of treesits in 1999, the ground support crews were made up primarily of loggers and their families from the small town of Randall, Washington, who were opposing the cutting of the forest on Watch Mountain above their community by a distant corporation, Plum Creek Timber Company. Logging of the 60,000-acre area would have meant certain death for the community from clearcut-triggered landslides. In this case, the community won.



There’s an important lesson to be learned here: while treesitters were in their perches, and ground supporters were hiking in supplies, townspeople were organizing their outrage during community meetings that overflowed with everyone from children to the elderly. Buses were chartered for people to confront Plum Creek’s officers in Seattle. The small town of Randall raised a unified voice, vowing to not give up until the deal to cut the forest was stopped. It was a celebrated victory.



Unfortunately, it was a rare moment of triumph in a history of continuing destruction. Families continue to be piggybacked from their drowning homes in the middle of the night because floodwaters are sliding off hillsides denuded of trees, and the coast guard is routinely called in to rescue motorists stranded atop vehicles on washed out roads. Others have houses sporting two-foot high waterlines in every room as constant reminders of the now-annual ‘hundred year’ floods. Property values plummet, flood insurance skyrockets, and meanwhile corporate timber is rewarded for its crimes.



All across the world communities are living with the consequences. Maxxam has been forced to deliver agricultural and drinking water to residents of the Elk River watershed since 1998 due to logging operations that have muddied and destroyed water quality. Logging destroys streams by causing massive erosion. Natural forests act as sponges, absorbing rain then releasing it slowly over time. Cutting these forests causes ‘hundred-year’ floods to become annual or semi-annual events. In 2002 residents were flooded seven times.



In Freshwater, however, Maxxam has been able to avoid paying for permanently destroying the town’s water supplies by silt from clearcuts. The residents of this small community, however, have had to pay tens of thousands of dollars to get municipal water piped in from Eureka in lieu of the local clean water they’d relied on for decades. In addition to losing water supplies, residents are forced to pay out of pocket to put their houses on stilts in answer to the newly regular flooding. As recently as eight years ago, the people who inhabit these areas would be kept awake by salmon runs making their way up the creeks, their thrashing tails propelling them upstream. Now it’s rare to see any salmon at all. In Cloney Gulch, the vicinity of my treesit, populations of Coho Salmon are down to one-tenth what they were less than ten years ago.



Activists — and citizens — everywhere can tell similar stories. Boise Cascade, for example, overcut the Pacific Northwest, and as ‘cut and run’ timber corporations do the world over, moved on to deforest other regions. To tell just one horror story of Boise Cascade, it moved a mill from Idaho to Papanoa in Guerrero, Mexico. Overcutting led to dried springs and communities with no water. Community members protested. 17 were murdered and 20 others wounded in the now-infamous Aguas Blancas Massacre. Although Boise Cascade was forced to leave the region — no one would sell them trees for their mill — Rodolfo Montiel, leader of the farmer-ecologists, was arrested and tortured with electric shock. As soon as Montiel was jailed, Boise Cascade's former partners attempted to begin logging again.



Then there is Weyerhaeuser, which by its own admission in [itals]only one year[itals] deforested 45 square miles in Washington state, 25 square miles in Oregon state, and 152 square miles in the southern US. This is in addition to forests liquidated in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Canada.



Or Sierra Pacific, which between 1992 and 1999 increased its clearcutting by more than 240 times, and increased the size of its average clearcut from 46 to 361 acres. It now has plans to clearcut a million more acres — an area larger than Rhode Island — over the next 10 years.



Exterminate them all!

When a forest is cut, not only trees are killed. Whether it’s lions in ancient Greece, spotted owls or coho salmon right now in the Pacific Northwest, or gorillas in Africa, the loss of forests means the loss of the creatures who live there.



The list of plants and animals damaged or extirpated by the deaths of once-great forests is long, and getting longer every day. Golden-crowned lemur, orangutan, Siberian tiger (of whom there are only 250 left), marbled murrelet, Port Orford cedar (killed by a fungus transported on logging equipment), black forest-wallaby, aye-aye, red cedar, mahogany, ivory-billed woodpecker, Carolina parakeets, golden-capped fruit bat, Hazel’s forest frog, smooth-skinned forest frog, Amur tiger, Amur leopard, forest owlet, Nelson’s spiny pocket mouse, Saker falcon, red wolf, panda bear, and on and on.



Scientists estimate an average of 130 species are driven extinct every day. That’s about 50,000 each year. That is not just by deforestation, but by the larger effects of industrial civilization. Nonetheless, 75 per cent of the mammals endangered by the activities of industrial civilization are threatened by loss of forest habitat. For birds, the figure is 45 per cent. For amphibians it’s 55 per cent, and for reptiles it’s 65 per cent.



Worldwide, forests are under attack. One estimate says that a hectare (two and a half acres) of forest somewhere in the world is cut every second. That’s equivalent to two football fields. One hundred-and-fifty acres cut per minute. That’s 214,000 acres per day: an area larger than New York City. Seventy-eight million acres (121,875 square miles) deforested each year: an area larger than Poland. Indeed, about three-quarters of the world’s original forests have been cut, most of that in the past century. Much of what remains is in three nations: Russia, Canada, and Brazil. In the continental US, only 5 per cent of native forest still stands.



And what do those who run the timber corporations want to do now? As Harry Merlo, former president and CEO of Louisiana Pacific stated, with no hint of irony: ‘We need everything that’s out there. We don’t log to a 10-inch top, or an 8-inch top, or a 6-inch top. We log to infinity. Because we need it all. It’s ours. It’s out there, and we need it all. Now.’



Fighting back
And so the fight goes on. Contrary to what many people think, treesitting doesn’t require everyone to spend months or years without touching the ground. Over the years I have met all sorts of people working hard to stop or slow deforestation. There are people who file lawsuits against individual Timber Harvest Plans (THPs), and people suing timber companies outright. Some people oversee monitoring stations that sample waterways to track the effects of logging on water quality, presenting their findings to the appropriate agencies. There are residents who come out in droves to speak at meetings with these ‘regulatory’ agencies, or those who include their voices in the public comment period that is part of the approval process for THPs.



On our public lands volunteers work on Timber Sale appeals – combing through thick stacks of brain-busting, bureaucratic paperwork which insist clearcutting hundreds of acres of forest will lead to ‘no significant impact.’ Citizen monitoring stations record the millions of pounds of sediment being dumped into our waterways from eroding clearcut hillsides. Other volunteers search the forests for endangered species such as red tree voles and rare plants in hopes of protecting small pieces of land. And yet the trees continue to fall, runs of salmon disappear, water quality is degraded, and the staggering effort put forth by concerned citizens leaves scarcely a discernable mark (or tree). It’s an awful reality that begs the question of what to do next.



What must be done?

In the relatively short history of attempts to stop deforestation in North America, thousands of people have been arrested. Activists and organisers have had pepper-spray applied directly into their eyeballs, have been car bombed for building bridges between exploited timber workers and environmentalists, been shot at, and one man was killed by a tree intentionally felled his direction (just after the logger had been caught on videotape threatening to do just this). Corporations sue activists and activists sue them back. Laws are passed to protect environmental health, only to have deforesters appointed to ‘enforce’ those laws. For example, California recently passed a law giving the Water Quality Board the authority to stop logging that would further degrade impaired watersheds. Within weeks, a chief apologist for Maxxam was appointed to the California Environmental Protection Agency.



This is routine. Thus, soon after Lee Thomas left his job as head of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) he joined Georgia-Pacific, one of the companies he had pretended to oversee. William Ruckleshaus, who also headed the EPA, went on to sit on the board of Weyerhaeuser, Browning-Ferris Industries, Cummins Engine, Coinstar, Monsanto, Nordstrom, Solutia, and Gargoyles.



Likewise, who better to oversee the U.S. Forest Service than the attorney who defended Louisiana-Pacific from charges of monopolistic practices detrimental to the people and forests of the United States? Ronald Reagan appointed such a person — John Crowell — Chief of the Forest Service. Crowell immediately set a goal of doubling timber production from the national forests by the turn of the century. That didn’t happen, in part because there weren’t that many trees left to cut, even if the market could have borne all that wood. But the cut did increase until by 1988 the US had become a net exporter of wood products for the first time, and Americans were subsidizing the US Forest Service’s destruction of public forests with billions of tax dollars. How can we work within a system that ‘works’ like this?



So, what can those of us who care do? So long as we relegate ourselves to symbolic resistance, we are assured that nothing will change. And so long as we expect a parade of ‘heroes’ to step forward to do the work for us, ecological and human health will continue to be destroyed, and all to the sound of a robotic rubber stamp that claims ‘no significant impact’.



Part of our problem is that most of us who pretend to resist generally don’t know what we really want. Do we want fewer clearcuts, smaller clearcuts, kinder and gentler clearcuts? We don’t know. And even if we do, we aren’t willing to do what’s necessary to stop those in power from murdering the planet.



Instead, more or less all of us yammer more or less endlessly about hope. You wouldn’t believe — or maybe you would — how many editors for how many magazines have said they want me to write about the apocalypse, then enjoined me to ‘make sure you leave readers with a sense of hope.’ But what, precisely, is hope? At a talk I gave last spring, someone asked me to define it. I couldn’t, and so turned the question back on the audience. Here’s the definition we all came up with: Hope is a longing for a future condition over which you have no control. It means you are essentially powerless.



Think about it. I’m not, for example, going to say I hope I eat something tomorrow. I’ll just do it. On the other hand, I hope that the next time I get on a plane, it doesn’t crash. To hope for some result means you have no control over it.



Does anyone really believe that Pacific Lumber will stop deforesting because we ask nicely? However, when we realize the degree of power we actually do have, we no longer have to ‘hope’ at all. We simply do the work. We make sure salmon survive. We make sure prairie dogs survive. We make sure tigers survive. We do whatever it takes.



And what will it take?



We can join those who are sitting in trees. Or if we do not want to climb, we can bring them food and water. Or we can help them in other ways, filing lawsuits, testing water quality or searching for endangered species. In short, we can use whatever skills we have in whatever ways we can to keep the remaining forests standing.



The only question, then, is whether we are willing to do it.



Derrick Jensen’s most recent book (with George Draffan) is Strangely like War – The Global Assault on Forests



Remedy is a forest activist who spent 361 days in a 1,200 year-old redwood without touching the ground before being forcibly removed by Maxxam hired climbers. She lives in Humboldt County, California.



Page last updated 5/1/04.
 
I am surprised to see this story still in circulation.
The environmental struggle for control between the logging industry and the folks who oppose it has valid points for each opposing side. I dont think anyone can say honestly that one side or the other has no blame in the daily struggle. I think it is vital that there is a voice of opposition.
When I first became aware of this story I personally investigated by asking both parties their explanations of the event.
The real story as related not only by the extractors but by the tree sitters themselves is different than this story posted on TreeBuzz by ChainSaw 47.
According to the folks who were there the event did not go down the way this story relates.
This whole battle is very important to many people and emotions run high. The facts and history surrounding the logging industry involve not only enivronmentalists but our park service, private landowners, as well as corporations.
I believe this is an important issue of our times, I live in this area and it personally effects my way of life. I like to climb giant trees and travel through old growth areas when camping or going on day hikes. and so I make every effort to be informed.
This article is not factual and only causes more anger and emotion to a cause better served by reasoned, educated, and factual responses.
Frans
 
Hi Frans,

I'm curious about what part of the article you find not factual. Which parties on each side did you speak with? The event described in the first part of the article was caught on tape from many different angles, including hidden cameras mounted on the hard hats of the treesit extractors. Bogus criminal charges against the treesitter have prompted an investigation and compilation of the evidence. The pre-trial for this matter has been postponed at least three times because Eric Schatz, the supposed victim of the alleged assault, doesn't seem to want to come testify and let justice be served. Why?

I'm personally being sued for a quarter million dollars stemming from the treesit extractions of March and April 2003. Far from grasping at straws, I have been working under the rigid guidelines of civil law to understand these events in preparation for trial. I am willing to discuss these events to the extent that I am legally able.

Remedy
 
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
The environmental struggle for control between the logging industry and the folks who oppose it has valid points for each opposing side. I dont think anyone can say honestly that one side or the other has no blame in the daily struggle.

[/ QUOTE ]

This isn't about a struggle between legitimately competing interests. It's about corporations who have a legal mandate to maximize profit in any way they can vs ordinary people who heroicly risk they safety to protect one of the most important living natural resources.

It's about state and national bureaucracies which are supposed to protect the common good colluding with corporations to engage in unethical, illegal, and often violent activity to protect profits vs typically non-violent citizens trying to protect themselves, their communities, and the health of the global environment.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
According to the folks who were there the event did not go down the way this story relates.

[/ QUOTE ]

According to the video of the event, which I've seen on the web, this article describes the event with considerable accuracy.

The history of America has been a history of the common folk courageously standing up against corporate greed and government complicity. The American revolution has never been completed, and these treesitters are among the heroes of the ongoing American (and world) revolution.

If you really want to understand how this fits into the broader populist stuggle for democracy, check out this article by one of the most insightful commentators on this ongoing American struggle, Thom Hartmann:

The True Conservative Agenda

- Robert
 
in the end it all is not worth the trouble because the corporations are greedy thats for sure but thier greed is fueled by our demand. if they were not selling this lumber they would not be cutting it all down. as the population of human beings keeps growing so will the depletion of all our natural resources on this planet not just our old growth forests. i find it is very arrogant of us humans to call this our planet as if it is here for us and only us as if everything on this planet is here for our use. its also funny how we act as if we have to take care of our planet because if we dont those squirrels and rabbits are going to screw things all up. when we are the ones who screwed this planet up. some even act as if we made this planet a better place when in fact this planet is worse off because of our very existance. i just find that it is such a joke to be talking about this nonsense after the fact when the damage is allready done. by the time it gets to someone having to sit in a tree the greedy corp has allready cleared the way legally to do his job and do whatever is needed to get the job done and has the law on thier side. maybe i am out of line but if the activists want to have better success they need to be a little more ahead of the situation by having insiders in these corps so they can get a grip on these things while they are in the planning stages after all these large cuts these corps do are planned 2 to 3 years in advance. when they to the point of cutting these trees down they have so much money tied up in it all the tree sitters in the world are not going to stop them .so lets all leave this political corporate greedy three hour posting crap to all our eco freindly widget the world watcher sites and get back to buzzin.
 
The tree sitters are doing what they feel is the right thing to do. There is a lot of support for going to military war, these people are doing their part in an environmental war. Very similar tactics and ideologies.

How is it possible to fight the likes of Maxuum? I haven't bought a piece of redwood since the early seventies. The only redwood that I have used since then has been scavenged out of dumpsters and off construction sites. That's how I have chosen to exercise with my pocket book. A very tiny effort but that's what I can do.
 
i hear you tom and you are absolutely correct and my hat is off to anyone who goes through that much effort for something they believe in. but my main disagreement is thier approach because by the time it gets to that point of where people are sitting in trees the death march has allready long been done and all it seems to get done is the people involved mostly the activists get harmed. and unlike military actions were there is always casualties i do not think activists should end up the same way. and i also believe that a lot of this old growth lumber is getting gobbeled up by these other nations like japan who allready raped thier resources and now want ours. look back at the 80's when all the talk was to save the whales and everybody thought we did a good job on that and meanwhile all this time japan and some other countrys have been slaughtering the whales without any hesitation. so my disagreement is not with the activists themselves but thier approach is what needs to be changed. if you want to call it a war then a war it shall be called but with every war you have to change your approach to combat the enemy and the activists have been doing it the same way since the beginning of time and as long as they keep doing it the same way thier results will unfourtunatly end up the same. as the old saying goes you can catch more fly's with honey than with vineger.
 
Your points are valid and well-written.

I agree, the tree sitters are making desperate choices. Last line of defense. There are other, main-stream, actions that are going on at the same time. These take time and money. Maxuum has plenty of both along with all of the other corporations.

Too often the wood goes off-shore as logs. The US has become a third-world producer of wood fiber. Some does stay here for domestic processing and use though. That is really sad. Why aren't there higher exit tariffs on raw materials leaving the US? We subsidize the logging, ship out raw materials and then import finished products. All legally too. Why? Because too many people feel that voting doesn't make a difference. Every elected official has some bearing on the way things move in the US. It's empirical. I had the good fortune to spend most of my life in MN and being represented by some incredible Senators and Representatives. I can only hope that this continues in MN and I can find out who the good ones are here in Colorado.

Be sure to vote in the booth and with your pocket book too.
 
Hi Mark,

I'm being sued by Maxxam/Pacific Lumber, who claims to own the 1,200 year old redwood I sat in. The lawsuit is called "Pacific Lumber vs. Remedy" which I find humorous and ironic, as that is precisely the problem - they refuse to remedy their lawless ways. There are thirty of us being sued on this lawsuit, but about 100 people being sued by PL all together. They are suing us for trespass and conspiracy. The trespass allegation is questionable since they have yet to prove they own the land (and even if they do prove this, I don't believe they have the right to cut a tree so old, especially when their logging practices are causing serious damage to downstream residents - while I was treesitting, one family a few miles away had to be rescued from their drowning home by the coast guard). Two other women arrested the same day and place as me went to trial on criminal trespass charges, and the jury could not find them guilty of trespass because PL never gave any evidence of ownership. The lawsuit also alleges conspiracy, which is a laugh since I still have yet to meet all of my co-defendants. My favorite allegation is that I am "willfully cruel, malicious and despicable." Given that Maxxam/PL have knowingly destroyed and continue to destroy water quality, endangered species habitat, and the health and safety of the people who live in the watersheds where they log, I look forward to the day we get to argue this in court.

According to the CA Dept. of Forestry and the Dept. of Fish and Game, Maxxam/PL have violated environmental laws 325 times since 1999; 70% of those violations damaged water quality. PL has had to deliver drinking and agricultural water to residents of Elk River since 1997 due to their reckless rate of cutting.

So - the purpose of the lawsuit is harassment. They want to intimidate anyone who would dare to stand up to their destructive practices. I don't have any assets and they know it, they just want to scare people from getting involved. They have gone so far as to sue people for speaking out against them on the radio. This type of lawsuit is called a SLAPP suit - Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. The aim is also to tie up my time and resources with endless paperwork so that I can't work to oppose them. Basically, they've hired someone - a lawyer - to fight with me.

No trial date has been set since they have yet to offer proof of anything they allege. We were just in court last Monday over this again. You would think they would be eager to prove us wrong and make an example out of us by winning their case.

The guidelines under which they were logging during my treesit were ruled to be illegal and, in fact, "non-existent" by Judge Golden last June. Despite the incredible amount of damage they have done and are doing (ask any scientist NOT on Maxxam's payroll), and the illegality of their operations, the cutting continues. Both the government and the courts seem impotent when it comes to reeling in this madness - which is why Maxxam ended up with over twenty treesits standing in joyful defiance of their liquidation logging last year. Currently, about 50 local residents are suing them for damages. Maxxam is also suing their own insurance company who is refusing to pay the multi-million dollar settlement to residents in a previous lawsuit. The insurance company claims Maxxam knew they were going to cause harm with the way they were logging, so why should their insurance pay for it?

Obviously, the cost of doing business for Maxxam/Pacific Lumber includes a staggering amount in legal fees. They are also being sued for fraud by the Humboldt County District Attorney.

Remedy
 
Hi Blue Fin,

You are right that tactics used by those who wish to defend the last remnants of forest need to evolve. As one friend says - you never win the same way twice. Back in the 1920's, a 54 year-old woman laid down in the way of an old-growth redwood logging operation. The logging stopped and an injunction was obtained to permanently stop the logging. The trees are now called Founder's Grove and thousands of people visit the area each year. This tactic would never work today - the poor woman would be deemed an "eco-terrorist" and hauled off to jail and slapped with a lawsuit. One of the last things that did work was when a treesitter stood on a double travers line between two threatened trees 150 feet above the ground with a bicycle U-lock around his neck and the top traverse line. It is rather insane the lengths that corporations and their representitives will go to to cut down ancient trees. These days, by the time they show up with the tractors, bulldozers and chainsaws, it's too late. It is nearly impossible to defend a piece of ground (especially when the company is backed by the full power of police who practice selective law enforcement).

I think another problem is that people expect one person or a small group of people to stop deforestation. It's a world-wide problem that needs everyone's attention.

Also, demand for wood comes more from the mills than it does from the people. A majority of people in the US would like to see old-growth trees protected (and many people are under the delusion that this is already the case). If people didn't care that old-growth was being cut, timber corporations like Maxxam wouldn't pay for bogus certification that marks their wood as "sustainable."

Tom is right that lots of people are doing other things to try to stop the damage. People file lawsuits and others lobby at the capitol. Here in California, the Campaign for Old Growth is trying to get a bill passed that would protect some species of trees (coastal redwoods, giant sequoias, doug fir, port orford ceders and hardwoods) that meet age and diameter requirements on non-federal lands. While these lengthy battles continue, the rate of deforestation only increases. It is hard to figure out what to do in the face of such systematic destruction. But I'm certainly in favor of direct action, and I expect to see a heck of a lot of it this summer. With the lethal combo of Bush's "healty forest initiative" (which could be better called the "horizontal forest initiative"), the gigantic Biscuit Timber Sale in Oregon, the dismanteling of the Northwest Forest Plan, and the streamlining of California's logging rules, we need all the help we can get.

Here are some links:
http://www.ancienttrees.org
http://www.greenpeaceusa.org
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/topic/forestactivism/
http://www.indybay.org/environment/
http://www.treesit.org/

Thanks!

Remedy
 
Everybody gets mad at the "Huge Logging Corporations" and forgets all about the guy who is not getting paid because some freak has climbed up this tree he is supposed to get down so he can get paid and feed his family. It's not the corporations out there in the field "torturing" these poor innocent tree savers, it's the guy who can't live without the paycheck.
I have no love at all for American forestry practices. I think they are completely negligent and irresponsible, but, alot of people complain about the industry while they live in a house constructed of wood and its byproducts. They choose maple cabinets and oak floors, they wipe their butts with "Charmin extra soft, with lotion" and go sit in a tree for a few months to make a point while other guys are living in trailers, can't afford "charmin" and their cabinets are coated with some type of photo paper that looks like wood. Whenever they get a chance, they go and cut down trees like their Fathers and their Fathers before them, to make money because they tend to be to proud to be on welfare, but they can't because some person, usually born with a silver spoon in their mouth and can afford all kinds of special gear and clothing, not to mention can seem to get away from work for months at a wack without any serious consequence while they chain themselves up to trees, is preventing them from making the money they need in order to take care of their family.
Now, as much as I despise the practices of American logging, if that were the only way I knew to scratch a living, and some wing ding was stuck in my tree, I can't say I would not do similar, if not worse. How can any of us that work for a living say otherwise. The problem needs to be solved at a different level. There does need to be sustainable wood, we need it! I will take a trim over a rmv everyday of the week, because I don't want to take a tree out if it's not necessary, but you can not place your values or preferences above those of a man trying to feed his family and pay for his electric bill. I mean really folks. There is a balance here that America just has not found. Unfortunately I think it'll be a long time before one is found because everybody is to dang fast to point their fingers and scream about how unfair life is rather than figuring out a compromise and dealing with things even if they are not quite on the same level that they had hoped for. America is pointing itself to death, and screaming about how unfair it is the whole while that we do it.
 
I can not think of anything that is made out of wood which can not be designed elegantly using other materials and physical principals. Dah!

We need nothing, ..., create something NEW!

Jack
 
Huge corporations like Maxxam are exploiting timber workers just as much as the forest is being exploited. Maxxam instituted a rate of cut that has resulted in workers losing jobs by the hundreds. Their own documents show that they knew back in the late 80’s that an increased rate of cut, the sole purpose being to maximize short-term profit, would result in job losses, but they did it anyway. Mills have closed (since unsustainable logging has put them in a situation where there aren't enough logs to keep the mills open), and in December of 2001, they laid off ALL of their loggers and truckers in order to use contract workers (to whom they don't have to pay benefits or deal with liability). If you go to a job site, you can speak to the workers if you know Spanish (hint: think cheap labor). Maxxam, a Texas corporation, is destroying the public trust in Northern California (which is relied upon by many, many families, not just timber families), and they are not even hiring the locals to do it.

Maxxam owns over 200,000 acres in Humboldt County. A couple treesitters aren't going to slow down their logging operations, which continue 6-7 days per week.

Maxxam has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to fuel hatred between "environmentalists" and timber workers. The corporations profit as long as the ire is not turned on them. Enviros and loggers can tear each other’s throats out if they want to, the corporate bosses are laughing all the way to the bank.

What will be left after Maxxam bankrupts Pacific Lumber (like they did to Keiser Aluminum, but not until after they had terribly disenfranchised the workers there)? There won't be much in the way of logging since all the saw logs will have been gobbled up. The fisheries are already done for, and the fishing industry has all but completely suffocated under all the silt from eroding clear-cuts. Taxpayers are paying every year to clean up the mess left by this criminal rate of cut. After nearly twenty years of Maxxam, there are now more families affected by flooding and landslides than work for Pacific Lumber.

Remedy
 
I want to be a treesitter evictor. Sounds like a cool job. I get $300 for a cat and $400 for a model airplane, I wonder if they get paid hourly or per/hippie??

That surely must be embarassing to get hog-tied in the middle of a granola snack, by some burly treeguy who just stepped on your face, and then be lowered to the ground in front of all the media like a calf at a rodeo.
 
Interesting conversation.

It is hard for me to feel sorry for the poor unemployed old growth redwood logger. What about the poor unemployed wagon wheel makers? Times change.
 
There’s no way they would get me out off a tree without killing me. If I was not so wrapped up in work and family life, I’d like to go down there and set up some tree climbing classes. Complete with tips on how to not let anyone in your tree, and how to set a traverse to another tree once someone does get in.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom