[ QUOTE ]
I've no doubt a knuckle boom crane has certain advantages like operating in tight spots.
However after watching this vid I still think a hydrocrane is faster because of its ability to spool down and up very fast without articulation of its main boom, which a knuckle boom obviously must do. I also suspect a hydrocrane can feed a WTC with far less articulation of the boom as well.
Now don't get me wrong. I realize there are things a knuckle crane can do that a hydrocrane crane can't because of its ability to articulate far more at multiple angles.
It makes me wonder why knuckle crane MFRS don't incorporate a hydraulic winch onto its hook section to further increase its versatility over hydrocranes?
Seems to me it would be far more efficient.
Nice vid guys. Looking forward to seeing more since I've never worked a tree down with a knuckle crane, just hydrocranes.
jomoco
[/ QUOTE ]
They do incorporate a winch. We didn't want it. Even if other machines are faster, how much faster is fast? Are we in a race? You can only go so fast no matter what you have. I'm not understanding why faster is even brought into the subject.
What the video doesn't show is an additional tree in the back yard being removed. That is 7 trees total. We did all this in less than 6 working hours with one setup in the drive way.
The main thing is we are not in a race. Even if you had the biggest crane money can buy, you still have to process the material and clean up and load up all the tools.
It is hard to understand things when you have never used them. I didn't understand it till I worked with it. I never want to go back to stick booms EVER!