This is a good example of statistics. The likelihood of this situation arising goes up with the number of times you are put into the situation. That you noticed it without coming into contact is pure luck. It points to the need for better inspection prior to proposing the work and setting a price. Had you seen this first what would've been done differently? Would you have pointed out the hazard to the client, made a recommendation to have the service dropped and repaired during the outage? I think the client would've been appreciative of it.
It's also a classic example of how we ignore the standards that are set out in our industry, i.e., all conductors shall be considered uninsulated and energized. The notion that you can presume the degree of electrocution based on the voltage means you understand Ohm's Law and have a handle on calculating the resistance present in the circuit you will form when contact is made directly or indirectly. Of course you all know that current is the killer and that it is inversely proportional to resistance in the circuit. Considering that most times we are soaked with sweat, our skin resistance isn't very high.
End of the day, we're not paid to guess with our lives. As Tom said, if you doubt that ask your spouse, partner, kids, parents, siblings, etc...